Re: apache wave

Hi Hans, On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 14:02, Amstel, Hans van wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very interested in this incubator project. I see great opportunities > for using it within our organization. But the website that is listed: > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/ is unavailable. Can someone tell me when >

Re: Wave Incubator Website

+1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 00:09, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alright unless there are objections, I recommend the Apache CMS for "basic > web content" with a supporting confluence space for developer documentation. > > I will coordinate the set up of the confluence

Re: what is the current status on bots?

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 23:09, Gerardo Lozano wrote: > We registered the bots via that URL. > > We found some issues: > > > - Not adding "http://"; causes uri.getHost() to be 'null' consequently it > appends null to the robotLocation string (this is > org.waveprotocol.box.server.robots.Robo

Re: what is the current status on bots?

Hi Gerardo, On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 23:09, Gerardo Lozano wrote: > We registered the bots via that URL. > > We found some issues: > > > - Not adding "http://"; causes uri.getHost() to be 'null' consequently it > appends null to the robotLocation string (this is > org.waveprotocol.box.serve

Re: question?

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:27, Altesco wrote: > +1 same situation here > > I tried to build the WIAB server a few weeks ago to give it a try, and > failed at executing. I then stopped here and didn't push this tech for my > startup. But that's too bad ! (I kept an eye on this mailing list, though

Re: SVN Set Up

Feb 2, 2011 at 10:00, Upayavira wrote: > I've done the authz grants. I could find accounts for everyone except > Joseph Gentle and Lennard de Rijk. > > I've also created the space itself. > > So, then next big thing is to work out whether to just commit a snapshot >

Preferred account ID and forwarding address

Hi, I didn't want to clutter the SVN thread anymore than I already did. I sent in the ICLA and I would appreciate one of the following account ID's: - lennard - lennie - ljvderijk My forwarding email address would be: ljvder...@gmail.com Greetings, Lennard

Re: WiaB official web site?

I have access to IEEE papers. If you can let me know when it is up I'm happy to give it a read. Greetings, Lennard On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 19:59, Torben Weis wrote: > Hi guys, > > thanks for the quick response! I will use > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/. > This seems to be save. > > 2011/2/2

Re: Value of http_frontend_addresses in server.config

Hi Yuri, It doesn't have to be the domain name. It is just the address the server will be listening on for incoming connections. The default example config actually shows that the server serves up example.com domain but listens on localhost:9898 for the frontend connections. I hope this helps a b

Re: Updating the Incubator Project Page

I'm guessing you had no luck yet since it still redirects to waveprotocol.org? Greetings, Lennard On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 17:08, Michael MacFadden wrote: > Mentors, > > I was trying to update the wave project incubation page. I found these > instructions here: > > http://incubator.apache.org/gu

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for February 2011 (wave-dev@incubator.apache.org)

Normally Alex would be doing this since he is mostly on top of it all :). I at the moment have no idea about everything that is going on, blame the fact that I'm working on my thesis, so please feel free to comment so we can put the list in the report tomorrow. - Old Google Groups mailing list

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for February 2011 (wave-dev@incubator.apache.org)

Thanks Soren! Greetings, Lennard On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 21:04, Soren Lassen wrote: > Thanks, Lennard and Yuri. I will append the following to the wiki page: > > Wave > > Wave lets you communicate and collaborate in real time. Wave in a Box > project lets developers and enterprise users run wave

Re: Code review request using Upload.py

Hi Monami, Please read [0] for a tutorial on submitting code. Basically hg diff won't show you anything but there is no diff against your own head (since you did a commit), you would need to specify the revision as is indicated in [0]. If the hg commit is the last transactional thing you did you s

Re: Code review request using Upload.py

e > performing any operation on "frameUrl" and "gadget.get("userPrefs")" objects > --send_mail --rev=711 > > Thanks > Monami > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > >> Hi Monami, >> >> Please read [

Re: Question about Wave-Dev

Integration of Wave into Outlook is also nice. Allows the lesser technical people to stick with something they know, see also http://wavelook.com/. Greetings, Lennard On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:09, Yuri Z wrote: > Here are the bots I know about: > *Mail-digester* > Written in python, using App

Re: Infrastructure Status

Hi Michael, That sounds great, looking forward to the thread with proposed timeline. Thanks for your hard work. Greetings, Lennard On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 22:22, Michael MacFadden wrote: > All, > > Here is a quick update on the infrastructure: > > Jira - Created, still need to get committers ac

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for March 2011 (wave-dev@incubator.apache.org)

Might want to add that there were 191 posts on this board from over 40 people last month so that this project is still active :). The board cares a lot about fostering a community if I remember correctly. The rest LGTM. Greetings, Lennard On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 04:24, Soren Lassen wrote: > Here

Re: GSoC projects?

Hi All, On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 00:31, Soren Lassen wrote: > I think it is. > > Is anyone on this thread familiar with the GSoC process and what steps > we need to take now? > I've been involved in running GSoC for the last three years. However I have no experience with how and if Apache allows

Re: GSoC projects?

fyi, http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html Greetings, Lennard On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 13:47, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > Hi All, > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 00:31, Soren Lassen wrote: > >> I think it is. >> >> Is anyone on this thread familiar with the GSoC proces

Re: [DISCUSS] Jira Components

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 05:16, James Purser wrote: > Sure, > > I'd probably suggest something like the following then: > > Web Client > Federation > Server > Extensions > If Jira will track our documentation issues I would add that component as well. This list sounds good to me. Greetings, Lenn

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: wave-small_tests #103

Sounds like a random hudson failure to me. Greetings, Lennard On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 22:24, Yuri Z wrote: > Hudson complains about the last commit. However the error message is not so > clear. Is it possible to find the real error in the Hudson logs? When I run > the tests on my machine - they

Re: Licence on Wave Protocol Logo

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:24, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not that I am against any of the suggestions mentioned, but have we > contacted google on the license on the existing logos yet? > > Which existing logos are you referring to? Greetings, Lennard > ~Michael

Re: Robot OAuth Trouble

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 06:10, Yuri Z wrote: > The URL for active API is: http://example.com:9898/robot/dataapi/rpc. That's the Data API for getting access to the user's data using for instance another frontend such as Splash, the robot/rpc link should be correct. Have you downloaded the latest

Re: Robot OAuth Trouble

another user. So, would > I be correct in saying that it does not need to implement > signed requests? Are there any security advantages of adding > this mode of authentication to my robot? > > Thank you both for your help, > Patrick > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Lenna

Re: [DISCUSS] Jira Cut Over

Seems to look good. Thanks for doing this. Greetings, Lennard On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 23:33, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira-test/browse/WAVE > > On Apr 27, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Yuri Z wrote: > > > The link is missing. > > > > 2011/4/28 Micha

Re: Proposal regarding code reviews and submitting

Hi Daniel, On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:43, Daniel Danilatos wrote: > I think it would be a good practice if everyone puts a link to the > code review in the commit message. This makes it very easy to see the > discussions/justifications that happened on a particular change. > > Thoughts? > I tota

Re: JIRA developer access

Mine should be lennard. Greetings, Lennard On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:10, Upayavira wrote: > If folks let me know their Jira ID, I should be able to do the > necessary. > > Upayavira > > On Tue, 03 May 2011 16:20 +0300, "Yuri Z" wrote: > > We have lately moved to JIRA to track WIAB issues and t

Re: GXP Questions

Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:54, Yuri Z wrote: > I think that the main advantage is that GXP verifies the HTML so it ensures > that if gxp templates compiles then the HTML is valid. Also it is more > secure. > The greatest issue with GXP is very poor documentation. > I also think it is someth

Re: GXP Questions

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 17:45, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have heard many comments from new developers on wave who were trying to > modify or add these kinds of pages struggling with figuring out how to use > GXP. I guess this is in part due to the lack of documen

Re: Ability to Delete Waves

Hi, If you are removed from a wave you are allowed to see the state (and history) up till the point when you got removed. This is unfortunately not the case yet for the current version of the c/s protocol. The intention has been documented at the bottom of [0] and works on wave.google.com iirc.

Re: Disable "Register a new account"

Hi All, On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 21:43, Yuri Z wrote: > Regarding disabling registration: there's no such property in the server > configuration, however, you can just remove the link in > AuthenticationPage.gxp and then remove the mapping to the registration > servlet in the ServerMain class. >

Re: Apache Shiro or Spring Security

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 13:34, Nelson Silva wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone tried to integrate Apache Shiro or Spring Security in WIAB ? > I have not heard about anyone that is working on this. Greetings, Lennard

Re: Code clean up: Removal of IndexWave and ConsoleClient

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 06:32, Yuri Z wrote: > Hello > The WIAB code currently contains a lot of deprecated and broken code: the > IndexWave functionality in Web client was replaced by an RPC calls to a > search service. The change was also dictated by the need to get rid of > legacy client-serve

Re: Code clean up: Removal of IndexWave and ConsoleClient

I like option 3 as well. Greetings, Lennard On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 06:50, Yuri Z wrote: > Oops, I forgot to mention option 3 which is also preferred and the easiest > one: > Option 3: To remove the whole IndexWave and ConsoleClient related code > without fixing it. > The suggested patch is act

Re: Code -> SVN

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:25, Thomas Broyer wrote: > Has anyone looked at the ConvertExtension from Mercurial? > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2106204/migrating-from-mercurial-to-subversion > > Yes. It is giving unexpected errors when attempting to convert HG mergers. I believe Yuri is als

Re: Code -> SVN

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 23:13, Matt Richards wrote: > I would think this should be possible, but I don't know that much about > Mercurial myself. From a quick web search, I see Mercurial has a conversion > extension, has this been investigated? > Yeah, Yuri and me are working on it. But it isn't

Re: Migration to SVN - clean check in

I'd like the history but the tools are apparently not matured enough to enable us to do so at this time. So grudgingly I give this a +1 because we can't stay on GCode :). Greetings, Lennard On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 19:03, Matt Richards wrote: > While I'm not that active of a contributor, I think

Re: Code -> SVN

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 22:49, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm this is interesting. The only reason this would cause me to think we > should hold of is that we know that Hg -> Git does save the history. > > What does everyone think? If at all possible I'd like to u

Re: Code Migration to SVN

Awesome :). Greetings, Lennard On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:30, Yuri Z wrote: > Thanks for doing this Michael. > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:44 AM, David Hearnden > wrote: > > > Great work Michael. > > > > -Dave > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > > > > Fab, thanks Mic

Re: October 2011 Incubator Board Report

Thanks Dan. I was unable to find the reminder email so I wondered what was going on. Greetings, Lennard On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:08, Dan Peterson wrote: > Nevermind -- Brett Porter updated the general@ thread and cleared things > up > "I removed Wave from the bottom as it reported last month"

Re: WiaB goes viral on HN

Awesome! :). On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 17:56, Clayton Audi wrote: > Heard it here faster than I did there, hmmm funny. > Can't go wrong with traffic. > > On 11/26/11, Bruno Gonzalez wrote: > > Upvoted and reshared via G+! ;-) > > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 19:35, Yuri Z wrote: > > > >> That exp

Re: interest in moving to git?

I'm up for helping out. - Lennard On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 19:34, Max pane wrote: > Hi, > > I would handle some responsibility in some section,This is jack john, > > > regards, > jack john > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Michael MacFadden < > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, we

Re: Review Request: Implement WAVE-313: registration disabling

FYI, I am traveling for the holidays so I am happy to take a look at this but it will not be before year's end, sorry! - Lennard On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 18:29, Ali Lown wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/3296/ > Review reque

Re: Review Request: Implement WAVE-313: registration disabling

Just nitpicks. LGTM after a final read through from Yuri since I am having a hard time reading code style using this tool :S. - Lennard On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 21:41, Lennard de Rijk wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/

Re: Review Request: Add an extra date formatting category between same day and same year

Can I get a screenshot :D? - Lennard On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 18:21, Ali Lown wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/3425/ > Review request for wave, Yuri Zelikov and Lennard de Rijk. > By Ali Lown. > Description &

Re: Review Request: Add an extra date formatting category between same day and same year

I am getting a no diff found error at this time. Did something go wrong when uploading? - Lennard On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 19:14, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > Can I get a screenshot :D? > > - Lennard > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 18:21, Ali Lown wrote: > >>This is a

Re: Review Request: Add an extra date formatting category between same day and same year

the moment :). Have not been involved that much lately due to moving there, just got everything back together, sort of ^_^. So no rush, because when you get up I should be asleep and it's weekend :). - Lennard > On Jan 8, 2012 12:15 AM, "Lennard de Rijk" wrote: > >>

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 14:17, Yuri Z wrote: > Fantastic MIchael! > It would be so great if you could post the questions+answers on the Apache > Wave Wiki. > I agree, we should put some effort into documenting vital knowledge about Wave that currently resides with the original creators :). - Len

Re: Review Request: Implement fix for WAVE-321 to prevent a complete crash when only a delta corruption issue occurs

t the caller deal with the > consequences, i.e. WaveMap. > > > - Yuri > > On January 8th, 2012, 11:28 p.m., Ali Lown wrote: > Review request for wave, Yuri Zelikov and Lennard de Rijk. > By Ali Lown. > > *Updated 2012-01-08 23:28:50* > Description > > Nothing ex

Re: Review Request: Fixes failing test - issue WAVE-308

iews.apache.org/r/3338/ > --- > > (Updated 2012-01-13 13:32:58.074069) > > > Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden and Lennard de Rijk. > > > Changes > --- > > Anyone to review this patch? > > > Summary > --- >

Re: It is time for wave

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:37, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote: > Hello Juan. > > Wiab still not usable. Please support my fundwiab.com initiative. > We are mainly in need of a good persistence and search solution :). - Lennard

Re: Can't submit patch for review to the wave/site/trunk/content/wave/index.mdtext

Could we change the wording to "An external development group can be supported via"? - Lennard On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:47, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote: > Hello Yuri and Upayavira! > > I wrote to tradema...@apache.org and did not receive any negative > response. > Yuri, could you apply this patc

Re: Can't submit patch for review to the wave/site/trunk/content/wave/index.mdtext

Also, could I have a link to the trademarks thread? On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:47, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote: > Hello Yuri and Upayavira! > > I wrote to tradema...@apache.org and did not receive any negative > response. > Yuri, could you apply this patch to index.html? > > 2012/1/20 Upayavira >

Re: Can't submit patch for review to the wave/site/trunk/content/wave/index.mdtext

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:14, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote: > Sure, but I'd like to give this donations to Yuri Z and all active members > who already did some patches. > I do not think this is 'external group'. > Up to Yuri then. I might not have all the latest info :). - Lennard

Re: Review Request: Decouple the search implementation from the waves persistence logic.

Are you using eclipse? Could you set it to remve whitespace at the end of lines upon saving a file :-)? I see a lot of whitespace damage (unless the diff viewer is tricking me). Upayavira, correct me if I am wrong. But I think the copyright header should state Apache (Wave) instead of nothing? Le

Re: Wave report is missing

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:03, Upayavira wrote: > The script that sends the notifications was changed recently, requiring > a different subscription to the wave-dev 'allow' list (folks allowed to > post without being subscribed), which means the reminder ended up in the > moderation queue. > > I'

Re: Wave report is missing

to volunteer > (likely requires vetting maybe 10 emails a day) - then let me know and > I'll add you to the roster. > > Upayavira > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012, at 09:18 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:03, Upayavira wrote: > > > >

Re: Wave report is missing

Thanks. On Mar 14, 2012 4:53 AM, "Upayavira" wrote: > I've added the three of you. > > See what to do here: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#mail-moderate > > Upayavira > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012, at 08:32 PM, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > >

Re: Review Request: Ads saved state indicator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4937/#review7388 --- src/org/waveprotocol/box/server/gxp/TopBar.gxp

Re: Review Request: Fixes WaveId.serialize() to use Modern serializer.

view request for wave, Michael MacFadden, Ali Lown, and Lennard de Rijk. > > > Summary > --- > > Fixes WaveId.serialize() to use Modern serializer. > > > Diffs > - > > src/org/waveprotocol/wave/model/id/WaveId.java 3ca5400 > > Diff: https:/

Re: Review Request: Makes the threads count for executors that handle wavelet loading and lookup configurable

view request for wave, Michael MacFadden, Ali Lown, and Lennard de Rijk. > > > Summary > --- > > Makes the threads count for executors that handle wavelet loading and lookup > configurable. That also should reduce the memory footprint as the wavelet > loading execut

Re: Maven Group Id

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > We are selecting the top level maven group id and wanted to get some > feedback. There are two thoughts: > > > 1) Very top level group id. I am thinking that everything coming out of > the apache

Re: Maven Group Id

uch > > wanted client API > > * org.apache.wave.server - the server (concurrencycontrol, federation, > > model, etc.) > > * org.apache.wave.webclient - the GWT webclient > > > > Cheers, > > PP > > > > On 15/06/12 16:23, Lennard de Rijk wrote:

Re: Maven Group Id

n a Box, > not just box. I am fine with box though for the group id. What do you > think? > > ~Michael > > On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Michael MacFadden < > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > &g

Re: Code Organization

Looks good to me. I was unable to find the edit button but I'd like to make the following edit: com.google.wave.api Shared classes between the client and server implementation of the Robot and Data APIs. - Lennard On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com>

Re: Code Organization

ws that it is only used by the org.waveprotocol.box.server.xxx > packages. Am I missing something? > > ~Michael > > On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > > > Looks good to me. I was unable to find the edit button but I'd like to > make > >

Re: Wave APIs

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > I have some questions on the Wave APIs in terms of what each one is for, > and what they offer. I believe I know the answer to some of these but want > to get opinions from the list before document

Re: Central wave site

Let me see if I can figure this out. On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro wrote: > Bumping this now that we are past the holidays. Are any Gwave team members > here who would be able to answer my question? > > > —Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > > On 26 December 2012 06:08, Thoma

Re: [VOTE RESULT] (was: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC3)

ct.html#wave > > - Ali Lown > - Christian Grobmeier > - Daniel Danilatos (though this was easily a year ago) > - Lennard de Rijk (ditto) > Still here, still following and helping out in the background when Googley things arrive (hence the reason why I abstain my vote, great work th

Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC3

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ X ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1I oppose this release because... > I support the effort, I have however not fully reviewed this version so I can't state whether I'