On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 19:23, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Hmm Not sure. > I will take a look at this review (and give you a nice colourful > screenshot) today (well later), since I don't know what time it is where > you are, but for me it is past midnight. :) > Residing in US East at the moment :). Have not been involved that much lately due to moving there, just got everything back together, sort of ^_^. So no rush, because when you get up I should be asleep and it's weekend :).
- Lennard > On Jan 8, 2012 12:15 AM, "Lennard de Rijk" <lenn...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I am getting a no diff found error at this time. Did something go wrong >> when uploading? >> >> - Lennard >> >> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 19:14, Lennard de Rijk <lenn...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Can I get a screenshot :D? >>> >>> - Lennard >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 18:21, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3425/ >>>> Review request for wave, Yuri Zelikov and Lennard de Rijk. >>>> By Ali Lown. >>>> Description >>>> >>>> This is at a friend's (user) request: >>>> It adds an extra fidelity for the wave client date formatting functions >>>> (used in blip displaying and in the wave listing), for waves created >>>> within the current month whereby it shows both date and time. >>>> >>>> This makes it easier to see where back-posting has occurred inside >>>> complex/quickly changing waves. >>>> >>>> Ali >>>> >>>> Testing >>>> >>>> Compiled/run on my server and checked on waves I had floating around from >>>> last year and ones updated this year but a few days ago, along with ones >>>> updated within the last day. >>>> >>>> All displayed the correct format of date. >>>> >>>> Diffs >>>> >>>> >>>> View Diff <https://reviews.apache.org/r/3425/diff/> >>>> >>> >>> >>
