hi, just wanted to chime in and say hello.
not a developer yet, but one idea i am curious about. is there a way to do
public waves so you could for instance have discussion like this mailing
list visible to anyone on the web but they would view the wave and not just
an email list?
just a thought
i was wondering if there is a way to setup a script or even a way to do
manually a login into apache wave , essentially i am trying to bridge a few
services together and was wondering if there is a way to login that is not
tied to a webpage.
thanks.
fleeky
If someone can point me to the appropriate sources and approriate wiki i
wouldnt mind cut/paste formatting some data for this project. i dont have
much time to do any real development on this but i can do that. i really
want to see this project succeed.
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Max pane
upayavira,
i strongly agree in shifting discussions like this to wave. since this is
exactly what it is designed for, if we cant use it for this then what good
is it? also by using it we will see what it truly needs to go forward imo
and also at the same time you can market it to new people by sho
another point , since wave is federated cant that lessen the load somewhat
?
although that sortof enters p2p rather then federated but still. yet
another reason to use wave for discussion, it forces the softare to
actually make good on its features that it already has.
also heck i cant imagine th
the way i see it new replies in a wave can be emailed, but the big problem
is how do you deal with a wave being reply being changed, eg how do you
'bake down' the dynamic nature of a wave into static email form.
a few ideas :
email every change as a reply in a message thread = extremely tedious
e
Christian , i just tried to make a new account on waveinabox.net, that
worked fine but upon trying to make a new wave it keeps crashing over and
over. so atm waveinabox.net is unusable for me, so actually im really glad
you made the suggestion to use it because it seems like there are some bugs
to
d several times in the past, though historically I think it's
> been stable more often than it's been unstable.
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
>
> > Christian , i just tried to make a new account on waveinabox.net, that
> > worked fi
eally dont care which wiab instance on which server we use, just
that i would personally like to be talking and testing wiab with all of you
:)
-fleeky
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
>
> > in that
as a server op, and rabid fan +1 its not 1.0 so if there are bugs its to be
expected. better to release.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Ray Arnado wrote:
> As an avid user, I would vote +1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
> ..
>
> On May 31, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Bruno Gonzale
michael , in the next couple of days i will try upgrading my server to the
latest release. need to check up on how upgrading an instance works and
then ill let you know.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a sanity check has any one grabbe
one thing that would be pretty sweet would be if you could subscribe to
mailing lists but from your wave server, extra points if the way you do it
is federating to the wiab.net server and subscribing to its email wave :)
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Pratik Paranjape
wrote:
> +1 Upayavira and
also as much as i really really want to do most of this communication on
someone (anyone's) wave server has anyone thought of having an official
wave irc channel on freenode or something ?
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:53 AM, John Blossom wrote:
> Upayavira, Thanks, those are my thoughts exactly. I
personally for me, ecpecially with the recent whistleblowing about the nsa
i see a real need for secure decentralized/federated communication
platforms that are easy and attractive to use, if wiab could be run on
everyones phone desktop or server it would allow the largest possible
cross-section of
it would be nice to get things like rizzoma to be all the way open source
since they seem to have really attempted to make something useable out of
wave.
i think its a great idea to bring the code together and also the coders
actually working on wave in some form or another, its yet to be seen if
john, i was infact using wave as a google docs replacement for a while it
worked pretty good the only problem i had with it was that i couldnt
'publish' static updates to a front facing page to share with people who
didnt feel like registering on my wave server.
an openoffice for wave would be ext
will it be possible to run multiple experiments on one server ? i doubt it
but just thought i would ask.
i would love to run a bleeding edge wave server since the one i already run
doesnt get *that* much use.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> When the time comes, I'm prepared
uhh, wow that is Amazing actually!
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
wrote:
> That looks fantastic!
>
> —Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
> On Jun 21, 2013 4:24 PM, "Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak)" >
> wrote:
>
> > I finally added *proper* support for inline replies. Keep in mind th
im about to test so i cant vote yet.
hi there, im updating my server as we spea., is there a tutorial somewhere
to get the federation working ? and who else has a server with federation
enabled so i can connect to them :)
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> This seems to have bee
ive been testing it and so far so good, i say +1 vote for release
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Does anybody else have any thoughts, comments, test results, etc. For this
> release candidate?
>
> Ali
> On 30 Aug 2013 23:21, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>
> > The time has finally come,
joseph, the latest rc does do federation. also is more stable.
christian, i still personally think we need to do things on wave. trying to
get people to use wave and not using it ourselves is silly. now we also
have federation, so what should really happen is a big push for everyone to
upgrade to
i completely agree to move it away from incubation, i think we should move
it out of github make federation easier and then market it on places like
reddit.
my 2 cents as someone who has been happily using this for sometime but sad
at the lack of progress.
thanks for the devs who do work on it th
also if we move it to github, lets finally have discussion for development
happen on a public wave ;)
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
> i completely agree to move it away from incubation, i think we should move
> it out of github make federation easier and then mar
@Fleeky:
>lets finally have discussion for development happen on a public wave ;)
I agree that the dogfooding should really have been a thing, but it
hasn't been possible here. (Though I hestitate to say whether Wave is
stable enough for multiple users heavily editing a Wave - my anecdotal
data sa
Ali , YES do all of that , and make a post about it on your wave server :)
im tensy on there btw, actually ive been running a wave server for a while
and the one thing im still hung up on is ssl and federation..
i think the biggest thing Everyone on this list could do is to get a wave
server up an
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Home
also there is #wiab on irc.freenode.net
also Ali just a few emails up mentioned that you could start a discussion
on his wave server , why not try those things first? a
to use
> wave might be self defeating.
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Home
> >
> > also there is #wia
our own, but tell me how
> is having done them yourself drawing in new users and developers along
> with generating interest? It may be happening, I don't see it.
>
> I am not talking about dogfooding, I am talking about intro and basic
> training so people can get up to speed.
&
longevity of the
discussion.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2013, at 16:40, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
>
> i really dont understand why i have to be explaining the usefullness of
>> using wave to communicate with the people on this list. its ki
of.
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 29 November 2013 23:44, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
>
> > christian, from my observations of the project i wo
how things work in that particular wave. that is the beauty and also the
problem of it.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Fleeky Flanco wrote:
> thomas,
>
> i dont think there has even been enough testing of wave to prove this one
> way or the other but the main point is that if we a
i think the most usefull reason to move to github, is that one of the only
active coders feels like doing it .. hence we should support that person :)
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> "But for
> that commitment, we need more consensus about what Wave should try to be "
>
>
the beauty of joseph trying to do a kickstarter to essentially restart
development on a 'spiritual' successor to wave is actually wave could still
stay in asf, as a legacy fallback option.
i feel like joseph manning up and really trying to set some real focus to
his own coding goals will be a win-
frank,
thats pretty awesome, my only question is why you used LM 13 and not say a
debian cmd line only distro?
either way nice work :)
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Frank R. wrote:
> I've created a vm. Now, I'm uploading it to Google Drive for sharing.
>
> Here is the log of how I made it.
i vote to not stay, to move wave away from apache.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Ewan Slater wrote:
> Et moi aussi.
>
> "Frank R." wrote:
> >Abstention due to my limited experience of either ASF Incubator and
> >GitHub.
> >Though, I want is a better future for Wave.
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Dec 11
move to git .
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> As one of the main contention points, lets get Wave moved off the
> git-svn life support, and in to a true git repository.
> Since this would affect everyone (especially the other developers), I
> am just going to run a quick chec
being able to customize the welcome page ? to what extent ?
i might have to turn my wave server on for this ;)
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Yuri Zelikov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> htt
he's dead jim ..
On Mar 14, 2015 9:56 PM, "Upayavira" wrote:
> Wave has been incubating for some years now, and, unfortunately, has not
> shown a level of growth that, in my opinion, would suggest that it is
> likely to reach graduation from the Incubator.
>
> Unfortunately, I think it is time w
38 matches
Mail list logo
