Update:
Went back to 1018 , no more test errors, but still get turbulence.
Went back to 1015, still can't get it running.
Got lots of DBUG::EOF org.eclipse.jetty.io.EofException in the output.
Since there is no xorg on the server, I've bound the server to
0.0.0.0:9898to access it.
I'm confused
Try to clean the browse rcache.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> Update:
>
> Went back to 1018 , no more test errors, but still get turbulence.
>
> Went back to 1015, still can't get it running.
>
> Got lots of DBUG::EOF org.eclipse.jetty.io.EofException in the output.
>
> Sin
Now recloning the repo to get a clean copy.
But what about those testing errors? without manually disabling that test I
can't even compile it...
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 22:52, Yuri Z wrote:
> Try to clean the browse rcache.
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
>
> > Update:
>
Thanks for the suggestion!
With 1018 I can get it up and running and keeping deltas. I tried Firefox 4
(haven't got time to upgrade) and it worked! However even I cleaned the
cache of Chrome 15 I still keep offline all the time.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 22:55, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> Now recloning th
Hi everyone,
I've pulled the tip and tried to compile it on Ubuntu Server 10.04.3 amd64
but it always fail on tests.
In test_out it says:
Argument(s) are different! Wanted: openListener.onUpdate( , isNull(), [DeltaSequence empty], isNull(), true, isNull() ); ->
at
org.waveprotocol.box.server.fro
I have been intermitently seeing this on chrome as well. I am on Mac OSX 10.7.
I was also having an issue testing a recent patch on Chrome, when I tested the
patch on safari it worked fine. So, we may be having some issues with chrome.
On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> Thanks
Hmm, just tried to run the ClientFrontendImplTest and all tests passed for
me... Strange. I ll try to investigate it.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> Now recloning the repo to get a clean copy.
>
> But what about those testing errors? without manually disabling that test I
>
I just verified that this test fails for me also.
On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Hmm, just tried to run the ClientFrontendImplTest and all tests passed for
> me... Strange. I ll try to investigate it.
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
>
>> Now recloning the re
In case you're not following the other thread that just started on this. Yes,
we are also having some issues.
On Aug 27, 2011, at 10:24 PM, James Purser wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Long time no speak and all that.
>
> I've just pulled the tip down and told it to build and I'm now getting test
> fai
I pushed a fix (revision 7e7b23fdf009). Please update from the tip and try
again.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just verified that this test fails for me also.
>
> On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
>
> > Hmm, just tried to ru
Tests are working now and compiling process is working smoothly (at least in
my eyes, I don't know much about the compiling process yet). Thanks for the
fix.
I still can't get Online on the newest version of Chromium. I can even get
my status to Online on IE6.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:55, Yuri
Just for the record, what is your version of Chrome/OS?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> Tests are working now and compiling process is working smoothly (at least
> in
> my eyes, I don't know much about the compiling process yet). Thanks for the
> fix.
>
> I still can't get On
The computer I'm using now is Chromium 15.0.866.0 (build 98596) on Windows
XP.
My home computer is using Windows 7 with Chrome dev-channel (15.something,
will check when I arrive home tonight). Haven't tried under Linux.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:40, Yuri Z wrote:
> Just for the record, what i
13 matches
Mail list logo
