Update: Went back to 1018 , no more test errors, but still get turbulence.
Went back to 1015, still can't get it running. Got lots of DBUG::EOF org.eclipse.jetty.io.EofException in the output. Since there is no xorg on the server, I've bound the server to 0.0.0.0:9898to access it. I'm confused because I've managed to get it running several months ago. I don't know why I can't run it now(looks like others don't have this problem). On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:10, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've pulled the tip and tried to compile it on Ubuntu Server 10.04.3 amd64 > but it always fail on tests. > > In test_out it says: > > Argument(s) are different! Wanted: openListener.onUpdate( <Capturing > argument>, isNull(), [DeltaSequence empty], isNull(), true, isNull() ); -> > at > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) > Actual invocation has different arguments: openListener.onUpdate( > [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root], null, > [DeltaSequence empty], null, true, "ch1" ); -> at > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224) > > Argument(s) are different! Wanted: > openListener.onUpdate( > , > isNull(), > [DeltaSequence empty], > isNull(), > true, > isNull() > ); > -> at > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) > Actual invocation has different arguments: > openListener.onUpdate( > [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root], > null, > [DeltaSequence empty], > null, > true, > "ch1" > ); > -> at > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224) > > at > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) > at > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.testOpenEmptyWaveReceivesChannelIdAndMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:133) > > and so on. If I skip this test, wiab won't run correctly, I can log in but > can't get my status to Online and keep getting turbulence. > > Now I'm trying to build on an 32-bit machine to see if it works. > > @James Purser, I'm not subscribed so I can't directly reply your mail but > yes, I think we got same errors. >
