The computer I'm using now is Chromium 15.0.866.0 (build 98596) on Windows XP.
My home computer is using Windows 7 with Chrome dev-channel (15.something, will check when I arrive home tonight). Haven't tried under Linux. On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:40, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just for the record, what is your version of Chrome/OS? > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: > > > Tests are working now and compiling process is working smoothly (at least > > in > > my eyes, I don't know much about the compiling process yet). Thanks for > the > > fix. > > > > I still can't get Online on the newest version of Chromium. I can even > get > > my status to Online on IE6. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:55, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I pushed a fix (revision 7e7b23fdf009). Please update from the tip and > > try > > > again. > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Michael MacFadden < > > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I just verified that this test fails for me also. > > > > > > > > On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hmm, just tried to run the ClientFrontendImplTest and all tests > > passed > > > > for > > > > > me... Strange. I ll try to investigate it. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Now recloning the repo to get a clean copy. > > > > >> > > > > >> But what about those testing errors? without manually disabling > that > > > > test I > > > > >> can't even compile it... > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 22:52, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Try to clean the browse rcache. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Update: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Went back to 1018 , no more test errors, but still get > turbulence. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Went back to 1015, still can't get it running. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Got lots of DBUG::EOF org.eclipse.jetty.io.EofException in the > > > output. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Since there is no xorg on the server, I've bound the server to > > > > >>>> 0.0.0.0:9898to access it. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I'm confused because I've managed to get it running several > months > > > > ago. > > > > >> I > > > > >>>> don't know why I can't run it now(looks like others don't have > > this > > > > >>>> problem). > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:10, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Hi everyone, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I've pulled the tip and tried to compile it on Ubuntu Server > > > 10.04.3 > > > > >>>> amd64 > > > > >>>>> but it always fail on tests. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> In test_out it says: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Argument(s) are different! Wanted: openListener.onUpdate( > > > <Capturing > > > > >>>>> argument>, isNull(), [DeltaSequence empty], isNull(), true, > > > isNull() > > > > >> ); > > > > >>>> -> > > > > >>>>> at > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) > > > > >>>>> Actual invocation has different arguments: > openListener.onUpdate( > > > > >>>>> [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root], null, > > > > >>>>> [DeltaSequence empty], null, true, "ch1" ); -> at > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224) > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Argument(s) are different! Wanted: > > > > >>>>> openListener.onUpdate( > > > > >>>>> , > > > > >>>>> isNull(), > > > > >>>>> [DeltaSequence empty], > > > > >>>>> isNull(), > > > > >>>>> true, > > > > >>>>> isNull() > > > > >>>>> ); > > > > >>>>> -> at > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) > > > > >>>>> Actual invocation has different arguments: > > > > >>>>> openListener.onUpdate( > > > > >>>>> [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root], > > > > >>>>> null, > > > > >>>>> [DeltaSequence empty], > > > > >>>>> null, > > > > >>>>> true, > > > > >>>>> "ch1" > > > > >>>>> ); > > > > >>>>> -> at > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224) > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> at > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) > > > > >>>>> at > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.testOpenEmptyWaveReceivesChannelIdAndMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:133) > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> and so on. If I skip this test, wiab won't run correctly, I can > > log > > > > >> in > > > > >>>> but > > > > >>>>> can't get my status to Online and keep getting turbulence. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Now I'm trying to build on an 32-bit machine to see if it > works. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> @James Purser, I'm not subscribed so I can't directly reply > your > > > mail > > > > >>> but > > > > >>>>> yes, I think we got same errors. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
