On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Michael MacFadden
wrote:
> After hooking up with Google for wave. I have been the lead architect for an
> OT framework much like the real time drive API being built at my company. I
> am encouraging my developers to reengage the apache community so we can
> acti
Upayavira,
Understood, I will provide a link to such an event to everyone here on the
list. John
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Please do remember, that while in person meetups or synchronous hangouts
> can be useful, they are also by their nature somewhat exclusive.
> Ther
Please do remember, that while in person meetups or synchronous hangouts
can be useful, they are also by their nature somewhat exclusive.
Therefore, please use them with restraint, and keep as much discussion,
and all decisions, here on the list.
Thanks! Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 01:37 P
In-person would be great. I am NYC/Boston area, where is everyone else. In
the meantime much can be done on Hangouts to make in-person as productive
as possible. J
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> Yep, I agree. Where should _that_ discussion happen?
>
> -J
>
>
> On Sun, J
Yep, I agree. Where should _that_ discussion happen?
-J
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Michael MacFadden
wrote:
> A google hang out amongst wave developers is a great idea. However this is
> not a substitute for presenting and discussing the future of OT with the
> active research communit
A google hang out amongst wave developers is a great idea. However this is not
a substitute for presenting and discussing the future of OT with the active
research community.
~Michael
On Jun 16, 2013, at 5:32 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Joseph, my thought is that we can have a Google+ Hangout a
Joseph, my thought is that we can have a Google+ Hangout and invite
everyone in the Wave community and beyond interested in OT and related
issues. Doesn't have to be perfect, we just need to get the
dialogue.rolling, it seems. We can always have more. Say Weds or Thursday
around 1700 UT+1? Pick a
Sounds interesting. Where is this going to be held? It might be
interesting for a few people on this list, too.
-J
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Michael MacFadden
wrote:
> After hooking up with Google for wave. I have been the lead architect for an
> OT framework much like the real time driv
Thanks for joining the conversation, Rob. I think that one key difference
in Wave - both as it is and as it could be - is that the data model is
based on how ideas and conversations form, not necessarily a final
artifact. It feasible, for example for Wave data structures to encapsulate
chat/convers
After hooking up with Google for wave. I have been the lead architect for an OT
framework much like the real time drive API being built at my company. I am
encouraging my developers to reengage the apache community so we can actively
contribute back. We have also done a in depth literature revie
Adding Svante Schubert to the thread, from the ODF Toolkit project.
He also chairs the subcommittee at OASIS that has been looking at OT
for change tracking in ODF.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Michael MacFadden
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/13 2:51 PM, "Michael MacFadden"
> wrote:
>
>>Rob,
>>
>>I w
Thanks, Rob, it seems that this opens up interesting doors for
down-the-road variants of OpenOffice based on Wave editing models and data
models. The challenge and the opportunity is that Wave's OT model acts on
the body of a document, so conversations and collaborations can become the
body of a mo
Note he's not subscribed - you'll need to cc.
Upayavira
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013, at 07:51 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> Rob,
>
> I would be interested in continuing this conversation. I have been
> working with the top minds in OT for the past few years. I am excited to
> hear the OO is interested
Rob,
I would be interested in continuing this conversation. I have been working with
the top minds in OT for the past few years. I am excited to hear the OO is
interested in an OT supported mechanism. How far along are you in the process?
~Michael
On Jun 16, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Please note, Rob is PMC member of the Apache OpenOffice project and
knows a lot on the project and how it operates.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I'm not subscribed to this list, but Christian Grobmeier pointed me to
> John's post about how OT and Wave could be relevant to O
I'm not subscribed to this list, but Christian Grobmeier pointed me to
John's post about how OT and Wave could be relevant to OpenOffice.
I wanted to mention that the idea is being discussed, but at the
standards level. The default document format for OpenOffice is Open
Document Format (ODF), whi
16 matches
Mail list logo
