Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:48 AM, John Blossom wrote: > Christian, > > Having borrowed most of this copy from the Cloud Stack > guidelines,apparently they have a list specifically devoted to marketing. > Seems like this might be a good move for Apache Wave so that developers can > focus more on what

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
Christian, Having borrowed most of this copy from the Cloud Stack guidelines,apparently they have a list specifically devoted to marketing. Seems like this might be a good move for Apache Wave so that developers can focus more on what they want to without being annoyed. I've lived in both worlds f

Re: Apache Wave Hangout - Link to Episode One

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom - Shore Communications Inc.
Joseph, I agree that the fundamental issues that you raise are the key of how to get development moving. "Mobile strategy" is there at this point simply to say that whatever solutions that we have, they need to be able to work well in a mobile environment. My own opinion is that Apache Wave needs

Re: Apache Wave Hangout - Link to Episode One

2013-07-31 Thread Joseph Gentle
Maybe. We can expose a similar client<->server API despite changes to the OT. If we're also changing the data type, that *will* effect the client. (And those two changes can happen in parallel) -J On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > Question; Will changes in the OT (and thus

Re: Apache Wave Hangout - Link to Episode One

2013-07-31 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Question; Will changes in the OT (and thus server to server) effect how clients communicate with the servers? Is the intention for client<>server communication be similar to server<>server? If not, I am just wondering if they are not tied together, then if development can happen in parallel? Bec

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:04 PM, John Blossom wrote: > Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the > Cloud Stack template up to date. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Apache+Wave+Social+Media+Guidelines This is very good! I would add that PMC membe

Re: Apache Wave Hangout - Link to Episode One

2013-07-31 Thread Joseph Gentle
I still want a technical deep-dive on OT at some point. Issues: - Are we building a platform or a product? (In my opinion our platform isn't good enough, and thats where I want to focus our efforts for now) - What OT algorithms should we use? - If we use Torben's OT system, how expensive is it act

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:49 PM, John Blossom wrote: > Yuri, > > I am fine with WaveWatchers being who we are, but WaveWatchers carries its > own branding - if we're going to do things specific to Apache Wave as a > community, then we should use that brand specifically, is my thinking. Most > espe

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the Cloud Stack template up to date. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Apache+Wave+Social+Media+Guidelines On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:51 PM, John Blossom wrote: > Ali, > > Great suggestion on guidelines, will post

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
Ali, Great suggestion on guidelines, will post similar for us for review. John On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > This seems like a good idea to me. > As long as we keep multiple comitters as admins, I don't think there should > be a problem. > > Could you first put together a

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
Yuri, I am fine with WaveWatchers being who we are, but WaveWatchers carries its own branding - if we're going to do things specific to Apache Wave as a community, then we should use that brand specifically, is my thinking. Most especially, when we do something good as a community, in Google+ I'd

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread Yuri Z
Why not just use WaveWatcher's page? On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > This seems like a good idea to me. > As long as we keep multiple comitters as admins, I don't think there should > be a problem. > > Could you first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like > Clo

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread Ali Lown
This seems like a good idea to me. As long as we keep multiple comitters as admins, I don't think there should be a problem. Could you first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like CloudStack has: https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/social-media-guidelines.html) Ali On 31 Jul 2013 19

Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
In conjunction with the Hangouts, I'd like to suggest that we create a Page for Apache Wave on Google+ where announcements could be posted about Hangouts and which, if desired, could have multiple personal accounts authorized to manage the page. This would allow us to have stronger Apache branding

Apache Wave Hangout - Link to Episode One

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
Thanks to Alex North, Ali Lown, Bruno Gonzalez, Jérémy Naegel, and Joseph Gentle for their active participation in our first Apache Wave team hangout. We also saw Christian Grobmeier trying to connect briefly, and some others are listed as having went, but that was the core group online. You can vi