Question; Will changes in the OT (and thus server to server) effect how clients communicate with the servers?
Is the intention for client<>server communication be similar to server<>server? If not, I am just wondering if they are not tied together, then if development can happen in parallel? Because to me; "...that can support multiple apps in a common data model?" To get those apps coming, all thats needed is some sort of way to tell the server what you want to do..you don't necessarily need *how* the server does that to be fully established yet. I think usefull mobile clients could be made even with a small subset of wfp abilities - its not like everything needs to be implemented for work to start. On 31 July 2013 22:11, Joseph Gentle <jose...@gmail.com> wrote: > I still want a technical deep-dive on OT at some point. > > Issues: > - Are we building a platform or a product? (In my opinion our platform > isn't good enough, and thats where I want to focus our efforts for > now) > - What OT algorithms should we use? > - If we use Torben's OT system, how expensive is it actually for daily > use? Is there a way to make it fast and still sign operations? Is > there a way to use OTR? > > This stuff is more important than figuring out our mobile strategy for now. > > -J > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:15 AM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks to Alex North, Ali Lown, Bruno Gonzalez, Jérémy Naegel, and Joseph >> Gentle for their active participation in our first Apache Wave team >> hangout. We also saw Christian Grobmeier trying to connect briefly, and >> some others are listed as having went, but that was the core group online. >> You can view the event at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNF_-ogcoIA >> >> We had a pretty good discussion, though it would have benefited from others >> more focused on OT, no doubt. I think that we've demonstrated how to use >> the technology to communicate in the community and to further leverage it >> to make the world more available of Apache Wave development and where it >> stands. I don't what to be the permanent host of these hangouts, or any >> person-to-person communications, but I am glad to help facilitate them as >> needed. It's a communication tool, and any way that we can use it as a >> community in ways that reinforce its goals and values is good. >> >> The main question coming out of this hangout from my perspective is this: >> how to we choose a path for development that will result in a powerful >> solution for mobile collaboration that can support multiple apps in a >> common data model? I don't know that a Hangout is the place to solve that, >> this is probable the best place to start. In the meantime, I will be glad >> to help create a new "office hours" event on Hangout and have people decide >> what they want to discuss. Thanks to everyone who participated, the >> logistics seem to have worked out pretty well. >> >> John Blossom
