in this pastebin
doc:
>> [1]http://pastebin.com/uGAUREhK
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -daw-
>>
>> On 1/4/2017 10:59 AM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hi Dave,
Fixed via:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5028/
I have rebased dependent patches.
/neale
From: on behalf of "Dave Barach (dbarach)"
Date: Sunday, 5 February 2017 at 16:55
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [vpp-dev] vpp patch(es) rebased to master/latest fa
Hi Marek,
Sure, I’ll add those too.
/neale
From: "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 09:10
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Subject: DHCP Proxy for IPv6
Hi,
while VPP does supp
Hi Jan,
What version of VPP are you testing?
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of "Jan Gelety -X (jgelety -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Friday, 17 February 2017 at 14:48
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of
Hi Pragash,
Some answers inline @[NR]
From: on behalf of Pragash Vijayaragavan
Reply-To: "pxv3...@rit.edu"
Date: Saturday, 18 February 2017 at 03:56
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: Shailesh Vajpayee , Arjun Dhuliya ,
Minseok Kwon
Subject: [vpp-dev] vpp query
Hi,
We are working on a bloo
Hi Jan,
Can you please share the test code, then I can reproduce the problem and debug
it. Maybe push as a draft to gerrit and add me as a reviewer.
Thanks,
neale
From: "Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Monday, 20 February 2017 at 09:41
To: "Neal
Hi William,
One of those it’s easy if you know what to look for bugs, otherwise a real
headache to find.
But a one line fix, so I might as well …
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5440/
/neale
From: on behalf of William McCall
Date: Monday, 20 February 2017 at 15:36
To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)"
t 11:51
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io"
Subject: RE: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of IPv6 FIB
Hello Neale,
It’s in review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4433/
Affected tests are skipped there at the
d-balance: [index:17 buckets:1 uRPF:15 to:[0:0]]
[0] [@0]: dpo-drop ip4
255.255.255.255/32
unicast-ip4-chain
[@0]: dpo-load-balance: [index:19 buckets:1 uRPF:17 to:[0:0]]
[0] [@0]: dpo-drop ip4
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 18:35
To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TEC
Hi Matej,
Your IP addresses are configured on the same interface; sw_if_index 6.
Sw_if_index 5 thus will not accept IP packets.
/neale
From: on behalf of "Matej Klotton -X (mklotton -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Monday, 6 March 2017 at 14:58
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "csit-.
Hi Pan,
Could you please collect;
sh adj
sh adj nbr 5
sh ip fib 192.168.1.1
both before and after the first ping.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of "Pan, Xiao"
Date: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 09:00
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [vpp-dev] issues when enable proxy-arp
Hi, all
I met an
of DPOs,
particularly if the result is a set of forwarding actions – like policy based
routing.
I hope that helps. If you’ve further questions, you know where to find me ☺
Regards,
neale
From: Pavel Chuprikov
Date: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 14:26
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "Neal
Hi Pan,
I see nothing untoward there. Could you please send me instructions on how to
re-create your setup. Then I can investigate why VPP restarts.
Thanks,
neale
From: "Pan, Xiao"
Date: Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 02:34
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.f
e_VPP_As_A_Router_Between_Namespaces&oldid=4046
Then if I try
docker exec con1 ping -c5 192.168.1.2
VPP will restart and clean all my previous configuration.
Thanks a lot
Xiao Pan
From: Neale Ranns (nranns) [mailto:nra...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 4:17 PM
To: Pan, Xiao ; vpp-d
Hi Matej,
We can add those /32 prefixes to drop packets.
/neale
From: on behalf of "Matej Klotton -X (mklotton -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Tuesday, 21 March 2017 at 12:24
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [csit-dev] Missing Network and Broadcast addr
+1
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Damjan Marion (damarion)"
Date: Monday, 27 March 2017 at 12:12
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Sergio Gonzales Monroy
Hello VPP committers,
I would like to nominate Sergio Gonzales Monroy as a
Date: Thursday, 30 March 2017 at 22:25
To: vpp-dev , "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Subject: Out of Tree Build Failure on vnet/rewrite.h
Neale,
Looks like we have that situation of either:
1) An include file shouldn't be #including another one,
and perhaps the latter might be
Ed,
Is that something we can add to the verify jobs?
/neale
From: Jon Loeliger
Date: Friday, 31 March 2017 at 00:15
To: Ed Warnicke
Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Out of Tree Build Failure on vnet/rewrite.h
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:42 PM, E
Hi Hongjun,
The new Multicast FIB in 17.04 removed the classify option for multicast
routes. May I ask the intent of the classification you want to achieve? Maybe
there is a way to get that behaviour with the new mechanisms.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of "Ni, Hongjun"
Date: Saturday, 1
Hi Hongjun,
Is there a general mechanism to steer all ‘for-us’ traffic to
tap-inject-neighbor? i.e. given this:
set int ip address GigE0/0/0 10.10.10.10/24
how do packets to 10.10.10.10 get sent to tap-inject-neighbor?
/neale
From: 倪红军
Date: Monday, 3 April 2017 at 13:53
To: "Neale
Message-
From: Jeff Shaw
Date: Monday, 3 April 2017 at 23:12
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: 倪红军 , "Ni, Hongjun" , "Dave
Barach (dbarach)" , Ed Warnicke , Lukasz
Chrustek , "Shaw, Jeffrey B" ,
"Damjan Marion (damarion)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.
Hi nagp,
A FIB walk that consumes 100% CPU is usually indicative of a cycle/loop in the
FIB undirected graph. Cycles in routing should not form permanently, i.e. the
routing protocols will eventually converge away from the loop, but they can
form temporarily.
Use;
‘sh fib walk’
to see the objec
[] = {
[FIB_WALK_LONG_SLEEP] = 1e-3,
[FIB_WALK_SHORT_SLEEP] = 1e-8,
};
I’d suggest ‘[sudo] perf top’ as a means to determine what is consuming the CPU
time.
Regards,
neale
From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Monday, 10 April 2017 at 09:53
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
S
Hi nagp,
If you know the destination address is link local and you know on which
interface, then the result of the lookup will result in the adjacency for that
link-local address on that interface, i.e. the adjacency you would get back
from;
adj_index_t ai = adj_nbr_add_or_lock(FIB_PROTOCOL_I
data-base serves this purpose*.
Regards,
Neale
*if you are using this in the data-plane though, we should consider
alternatives.
From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 14:04
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets fr
Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 18:30
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets from control plane to a link local
IPv6 address?
Thanks! One small question - if the neighbor is not resolved yet, will the
lookup yield a glean adjacency? If that i
/
please let me know if it fixes your issue. If so I’ll merge.
Thanks,
neale
From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 14:12
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] How to send packets from control plane to a link local
IPv6 address?
Hi
Hi Christian,
The short answer is you augment an IP route to specify an out-going MPLS label
for the path;
Ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.1.1 GigE0/0/0/0 out-label 99
For the long answer please consult (which I just this second uploaded):
https://wiki.fd.io/view/File:FIB_2.0_-_Hierarchica
Hi nagp,
I’d suggest a modification to ip6_interface_first_address to indicate whether a
link-local is ok. Then you can choose to ignore the link-local when the ping’s
destination is global scope.
Regards,
neale
From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:4
Hi Nagp,
Use hash_free(). The hash_delete() function has been removed from more recent
versions.
Hth,
neale
From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Monday, 1 May 2017 at 16:47
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] How to destroy a hash?
I see that the hash_delete function in vppinfra/hash
Hi Guy,
There are a few answers to this problem. Can you please give us more details on
what you are trying to achieve? An example of the type of packet you want to
listen for and what you want to happen to it once it is heard.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of "Guy Doucet -X (gudoucet -
FLE
Dear VPP community,
We are beginning to compile the list of features that we plan to release in
17.07 and a release schedule. Please see the wiki page here (compiled by Jong):
https://wiki.fd.io/view/Projects/vpp/Release_Plans/Release_Plan_17.07
Please feel free to add any features that you
Hi Ewan,
Please post your configs and the output of ‘sh ip arp’.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com"
Date: Friday, 12 May 2017 at 12:33
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] arp_input
Here are two arp_input functions on vpp 16.09 and vpp 17.04, if my VM have
two ethernet in
Hi Ewan,
You mentioned that these interfaces are ‘bridged to the same host phy
interface’ – can you please share the relevant configs for that.
Thanks,
neale
From: "yug...@telincn.com"
Date: Friday, 12 May 2017 at 13:51
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subje
Hi Ewan,
That’s a bug. I’ll fix it ASAP.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com"
Date: Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 03:24
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] Segmentation fault in recursivly lookuping fib entry.
Hi, all
Below are my main configs, others are default.
When i knock into t
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6674/
/neale
From: "yug...@telincn.com"
Date: Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 14:24
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] Segmentation fault in recursivly lookuping fib entry.
Hi neale,
Could you leave me a msg
From: "Luke, Chris"
Date: Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 19:04
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "yug...@telincn.com"
, vpp-dev
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Segmentation fault in recursivly lookuping fib entry.
CSIT seems to be barfing on every job at the moment :(
From: vpp-dev-boun.
Hi Marco,
I’ll restart the jobs once we’ve got them passing again.
For your reference, you can do it manually by typing ‘recheck’ as a code review
comment in gerrit.
regards,
neale
From: Marco Varlese
Date: Monday, 15 May 2017 at 12:17
To: "Damjan Marion (damarion)" , "Neal
Hi Marco,
Please wait. I’ll re-submit the jobs when we’ve got everything ready.
Thanks,
neale
From: Marco Varlese
Date: Monday, 15 May 2017 at 15:12
To: "Damjan Marion (damarion)" , "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-
“pc-1.0”) which
> VIRL uses.
>
> Fix (revert) is in gerrit:
>
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6690/
>
> Regards,
>
> Damjan
>
>
>> On 13 May 2017, at 20:34, Neale Ranns (nranns) > <mailto:nra...@cisco.com
ay 2017 at 19:45
To: "csit-...@lists.fd.io"
Cc: Ray Kinsella , "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master
+csit-dev
-Maciek
> On 15 May 2017, at 18:09, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
>
addition to the questions Ray and Damjan have raised, it would be helpful if
you could explain how these two VPP instances are connected.
regards,
neale
From: "Dave Barach (dbarach)"
Date: Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 12:32
To: 薛欣颖 , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "Neale Ran
output from 17.04 to 17.01 is not an error, it’s just
that the rewrite string on the adjacency is no longer pretty printed/decoded.
Regards,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Wednesday, 17 May 2017 at 02:07
To: Damjan Marion
Cc: vpp-dev , "Dave Barach (dbarach)" ,
"Neale Ranns (nranns)"
S
Hi Matt,
No ARP lookup is needed for interfaces that are point-2-point. The FIB will
link entries reachable through a p2p interface using a special ‘auto’
adjacency. The auto adj has the all zeros address as a next-hop and a rewrite
that is constructed by the interface type (i.e. for GRE has tu
Hi Nagp,
I’d recommend option 1, since the mechanisms to achieve it are already in place.
To add a path to receive traffic for a multicast FIB entry is much the same as
for unicast (i.e. see ip6_create_mfib_with_table_id() where we add the special
IPv6 ND entries). The additional configuration
Hi Xyxue,
MPLS labels are popped once they have been used in the lookup stage. The path
(i.e. the config after the ‘via’ keyword) describes whether a new label should
be pushed, so the absence of an out-label keyword there means that the router
will be seen to pop the label.
These configs then
Hi Xyxue,
Nothing wrong with that config. But there is a bug in VPP. I’ll fix that ASAP.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of 薛欣颖
Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 07:52
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] Assert appears when configuring MPLS tunnel
Hi guys,
Why the assert appear on version 17.07, is t
Hi Xyxue,
Yes, that’s correct. Note the ip4-lookup-in-table-1 implies a VRF lookup.
Regards,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 10:15
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS LABEL
Hi neale,
Thank you very much for your reply!
You mean
Hi Xyxue,
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6837/
regards,
neale
From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 08:42
To: 薛欣颖 , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Assert appears when configuring MPLS tunnel
Hi Xyxue,
Nothing wrong with that config. But there is a
Hi Xyxue,
The lookup was performed in FIB index 1– you must have used ‘set int ip table
host-XXX YYY’ - but the route you added is in the default table.
If you want the routes in the same table as the interface do;
Ip route add table YYY 192.168.3.0/24 via mpls-tunnel0 out-label 1023
Regards,
Hi Xyxue,
VPP does not support VP{WL]S.
However, I’ve made a patch to enable it;
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6861/1
please experiment and let me know how you get on.
Changes to your configs below:
- Create the mpls tunnel in L2 mode
mpls tunnel l2-only via 1.1.1.2 host-eth0 out-label
Hi Alessio,
My guess is the probe command caused VPP to crash, and since your running it as
a deamon, it restarted with your previous configs gone.
The probe command sends an ARP request to the address in question, so don’t
probe your own address, instead probe a peer’s. These days we also hav
Hi Matt,
Glad to hear it. And thank you for the patch.
Regards,
neale
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Smith
Date: Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 22:24
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] IPsec interface handling in FI
expect
the decapped packet to match.
Thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 06:36
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi Neale,
The ping still failed .Here is the specific information：
DBGvpp# show trace
CLIB unkn
Hi Xyxue,
Thanks, that helps.
Can I also see:
1) The ‘sh trace’ (with the patch applied)
2) ‘sh ip fib index 1’ where this time PREFIX is the address the
RX packets should match.
Thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 11:52
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
oth. Sp we see VPP’s local addresses.
Thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 03:26
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi Neale，
That is the infomation about it:
VPP2 ->vpp1 sip： 192.168.2.20 -- dip：192.168
Hi Xyxue,
So the addresses you are pinging to and from are not owned by the VPPs. Are you
issuing the ping command on a VPP or on the device that owns the address.?
/neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 08:43
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev]
Hi nagp,
In the latest VPP code adjacency index 0 is valid. In older code this was not
the case.
Regards,
neale
From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 08:43
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] Is adj_index "0" not valid?
Hi,
In the latest VPP code, in icmp6_route
Hi Xyxue,
Yes, I think that looks good.
To do VPLS add the mpls-tunnel and [many] host-eth to a bridge-domain, rather
than a x-connect.
Regards,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 09:00
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS
Hi nea
Yes please ☺ assuming of course mcast_adj_index defaults to ~0 when the
radv_info is first created.
/neale
From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 10:12
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Is adj_index "0" not valid?
Th
, 26 May 2017 at 10:26
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi neale,
Each of the two VPP is connected to a CE. I'm pinging to and from the CE.
Thanks,
xyxue
____
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)<mailt
Hi Xyxue,
As you say, probably also:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6883/
thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Friday, 26 May 2017 at 12:16
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS
Hi neale,
My configuration and result is shown b
debugging the original problem.
I you sure you patched and recompiled the DEBUG version of VPP on both ‘PE’s’?
Thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Saturday, 27 May 2017 at 06:33
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi neale,
The result :flow
change from CE->CE since the IP TTL decrements.
/neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Saturday, 27 May 2017 at 11:07
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi neale,
The ping we were debugging now work.'Bi-directional flow 'is the fade flow se
Hi Guy,
Do you edit;
/src/vnet/udo/udp.h
or one of its clones in the install-vpp-XXX/build-vpp-XXX directories?
You should be editing the file in the src directory.
Regards,
neale
From: on behalf of "Guy Doucet -X (gudoucet -
FLEXTRONICS CANADA DESIGN SERVICES INC at Cisco)"
Date: Monday
Hi Nagp,
It’s not expected.
/neale
From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Date: Monday, 29 May 2017 at 17:43
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP crashes with "ip probe-neibhbor " for a /31
subnet neighbor
Hi,
VPP in the latest builds crashes with the probe-neighbor command for a /31
n
HiNagp,
Does this work for you?
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6918/
/neale
From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 09:28
To: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP crashes with "ip probe-neibhbor " for a
/31 subne
Hi Juraj,
Please try this:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6936/
which is intended to implement Ole’s suggestion.
thanks,
neale
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 10:19
To: "otr...@employees.or
a separate
L3 interface and thus require a different sub-net to the main interface – which
is not the sub-net the sender is in.
I agree with the output feature approach.
Regards,
neale
-Original Message-
From: "John Lo (loj)"
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 19:01
To: "Neal
Hi John,
Thanks for clarifying.
Regards,
neale
-Original Message-
From: "John Lo (loj)"
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 19:43
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" , "otr...@employees.org&
Hi Xyxue,
Can you please give me the full configs in each case.
Thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 06:56
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi neale,
Sorry for not replying to your email in time.
19
Hi Xyxue,
MPLS tunnels (and all other tunnels/virtual interfaces) should accumulate stats.
Are you seeing no stats when the MPLS tunnel is carrying L2 or L3 traffic?
Regards,
neale
From: on behalf of 薛欣颖
Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 07:28
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [vpp-dev] The co
Hi Xyxue,
You said there are two scenarios; with MPLS (broken), without MPLS (working).
Which scenario is this config for? And can I see the other one too please.
Thanks,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 08:10
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re
192.168.2.20
tos 0x00, ttl 62, length 84, checksum 0x0c33
fragment id 0xe9fd
ICMP echo_reply checksum 0x243e
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 08:40
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED
Hi Neale,
MPLS-tunnels are uni-directional, so you’ll never see RX.
Regards,
Neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 09:45
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] The count information on virtual interface
Hi Neale,
The mpls-tunnel0 display only the tx/
Hi Xyxue,
Works for me with:
DBGvpp# sh ver
vpp v17.07-rc0~312-g2062ca5 built by vagrant on localhost at Wed May 31
03:29:47 PDT 2017
configs and setup attached.
Regards,
neale
From: 薛欣颖
Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 10:08
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev
Subject: VPLS VP
Dear cmh2014011443,
You can send the packets that you want to drop to the ‘ip4-drop’ or ‘ip6-drop’
nodd.
regards,
Neale
De : au nom de "cmh2014011...@gmail.com"
Date : jeudi 16 mai 2019 à 10:51
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : [vpp-dev] how to drop packet in the vpp's plugin?
Recently,
Hi Alexsander,
I don’t see anything wrong with the configuration.
Could you please provide a packet trace.
Thanks,
neale
De : au nom de Aleksander Djuric
Date : jeudi 16 mai 2019 à 16:30
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : [vpp-dev] issues with proxy-arp
Hello,
I need to configure proxy-arp
Hi,
VRFs are an ingress function, encryption is egress, so I’m not sure I
understand your request. Perhaps you could give us more details on your use
case.
Regards,
neale
De : au nom de "omid via Lists.Fd.Io"
Répondre à : "zeinalpouro...@yahoo.com"
Date : samedi 18 mai 2019 à 09:40
À : Vp
Hi Christian,
Type 'recheck' as a review comment, with Jenkins as a review, he'll kick of the
job again.
/neale
-Message d'origine-
De : au nom de Christian Hopps
Date : samedi 18 mai 2019 à 15:54
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc : "cho...@chopps.org"
Objet : [vpp-dev] Jenkins testben
Hi VPP-IPSec-ers,
I'd like to gauge comments on this article:
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/IPSec
and the proposal for the IPSec tunnel re-model.
The associated patch is:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18956/
thanks,
Neale
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this gro
Hi Ole,
Thanks for taking the time to examine the proposal. Lots of comments inline
> Answering as a non VPP-IPsec'er. More like an anti-IPsec'er if anything.
;-)
> Eecutive summary: Not a fan.
> This tastes too much of the dreams of the IPsec'ers of the past. Where
IPsec
HI Murthy,
There are two plugins, that I know of, that use the ACL as a service; ACL based
forwarding (ABF) and group based policy (GBP).
Both of these plugins expect that the user first configures the ACL using the
ACL plugin, then passes the index of the ACL during ABF/GBP programming. This
Hi Uzzam,
All these:
sudo vppctl set interface l2 bridge loopX 1
Should be:
sudo vppctl set interface l2 bridge loopX 1 bvi
/neale
De : au nom de Uzzam Javed
Répondre à : Uzzam Javed
Date : jeudi 23 mai 2019 à 14:50
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc : "b...@xflowresearch.com"
Objet : [vpp-d
Hi Uzzam,
I have already tried using the command 'sudo vppctl set interface l2 bridge
loopX 1 bvi' but the vpp crashes after few seconds.
Can we see a back trace, please?
While on the other hand when I use the command 'sudo vppctl set interface l2
bridge loopX 1', loop1 does not receive traffi
replay should VPP crash, so having download the full update each time is
fine IMO.
Does that sound reasonable?
Regards,
neale
De : Matthew Smith
Date : mercredi 22 mai 2019 à 17:50
À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] RFC: IPSec Tunnel re
Pre 1908 :
static clib_error_t *
my_module_init (vlib_main_t * vm)
{
if ((error = vlib_call_init_function (vm, some_other_module_init)))
return (error);
} ;
post 1908 :
VLIB_INIT_FUNCTION (my_module_init) =
{
.runs_after = VLIB_INITS("some_other_module_init"),
};
/neale
the interposed
gbp_policy_dpo_t for an example.
Regards,
neale
De : "Dave Barach (dbarach)"
Date : vendredi 14 juin 2019 à 20:30
À : "mgsm...@netgate.com" , "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] identifying packets sent to a loopback address
This is a Nea
Hi Yi-Lin,
You need to select the correct back end:
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/IPSec#IPSec_Implementations
/neale
De : au nom de Yilin Shieh
Date : mardi 18 juin 2019 à 14:01
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : [vpp-dev] #vpp How to enable intel QAT hw cryptpdev
Hi all,
I tried to enable
Dear All,
Please note that:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/12296/
has been merged into VPP and has changed the route add/del API.
/neale
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13321): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13321
Mute This Top
Hi Anthony,
That wiki page you reference describes this setup. Perhaps if you ask specific
questions on the parts that are not clear I can help you.
/neale
De : au nom de Anthony Linz
Date : mardi 18 juin 2019 à 12:10
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : [vpp-dev] VPP MPLS VPN Configuration #v
Hi Alexander,
Then your applications need a message bus. VPP does not provide that
functionality for you. Notifications are only provided for data that VPP
learns, not what other client programme it with.
Regards,
Neale
De : au nom de "Alexander Chernavin via Lists.Fd.Io"
Répondre à : "ac
Hi Chore,
Thank you for the patch, I have merged it.
/neale
De : au nom de emma sdi
Date : mercredi 26 juin 2019 à 07:06
À : Damjan Marion
Cc : vpp-dev
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] NAT dose not exist in MAINTAINERS file
Hi Dear VPP
Would you please take a look at https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/20325
Here’s a fix for BIER:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/20349/
/neale
De : au nom de Florin Coras
Date : mercredi 26 juin 2019 à 00:51
À : "Dave Barach (dbarach)"
Cc : Paul Vinciguerra , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI
This [1] seems to solve sctp issues with deb
Hi Raj,
There's no good way to do it, there's also no notification should the feature
be disabled or enabled.
Instead I'd suggest you 'listen' to the entity enabling/disabling the feature.
Or maybe you can configure your feature to run before this one, then it's not
important whether it's enabl
Dear Varban,
Welcome to the VPP community 😊 you have reached the right group…
I suspect you need to flip the IP ranges for your inbound policy command. For
the outbound policy the remote address is compared with the packet's
destination, for the inbound policy the remote address is compared wi
Hi Matt,
I would tend to agree with you. The interface’s IP addresses should not be
programmed in the FIB if the interface is down.
/neale
De : au nom de "Matthew Smith via Lists.Fd.Io"
Répondre à : "mgsm...@netgate.com"
Date : mardi 16 juillet 2019 à 21:42
À : vpp-dev
Cc : "vpp-dev@list
Hi Matt,
Sounds like exactly what we need.
/neale
De : Matthew Smith
Date : mercredi 17 juillet 2019 à 14:52
À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc : vpp-dev
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] loopback admin status
Hi Neale,
Thanks for your reply.
I noticed that there is a function for
Dear Brayan,
You should always add a next-hop to a path when IP routing.
Answers comments inline.
/neale
De : au nom de brayan ortega
Date : mercredi 24 juillet 2019 à 11:25
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : [vpp-dev] abf problem with arp
Dear VPP Folks,
I'm using vpp v19.08-rc0~698-g1f50bf
,
neale
De : brayan ortega
Date : mercredi 24 juillet 2019 à 16:13
À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] abf problem with arp
Dear Neale,
Thanks for your prompt response.
Answer comments inline.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:16 PM Neale Ranns
401 - 500 of 728 matches
Mail list logo
