Hi Vanessa,
I pushed a couple of changes via your suggested
git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master%wip
and I noticed that on all of these the verify jobs were (attempted to) run. One
of the advantages of draft changes is that it doesn’t eat resources for
pointless verify jobs.
Thanks,
Klement
What IDE?
Have you tried running it from make test-shell-debug?
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Keith Burns
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 3:12 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] Add test framework to pythonpath ?
Issue:
IDE doesn't know what to do with:
"from framework imp
Hi,
thank you for your report.
Can you please apply this fix and verify that the behaviour is now correct?
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/24388
Thanks,
Klement
> On 17 Jan 2020, at 07:04, sont...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have observed an incorrect behavior in BFD code of VPP.
> I have
Hi
Click the first link -> console output -> show all
You’ll see test failures.
You can run locally these tests by invoking “make test”.
Once fixed, reupload your change.
HTH..Klement
> On 3 Feb 2020, at 14:44, Shiva Shankar wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I am seeing below error messages during
There is also test/scripts/test-loop.sh which might some users better.
Regards,
Klement
> On 12 Mar 2020, at 19:08, Dave Wallace wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Your patch [0] verified, Ray +1'd it, and I merged it.
>
> In my investigation on Naginator retries, I found an unrelated gerrit change
> [
Hi Neale,
When originally designing this, I opted in for `mktemp` as that’s the usual way
to avoid clashes as at that time I assumed that this might be used on boxes
where there are multiple users and they might like to run tests in parallel. At
that time I didn’t expect issues like multiple vp
You can reference reassembly code, which does something similar.
e.g. ip4_sv_reass.c
HTH,
Klement
> On 17 Apr 2020, at 18:03, Satya Murthy wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> We are having a scenario to support as below and we would like to know what
> we are doing here is correct or not.
>
> 1. Our graph
clang-format can be tuned to emulate indent - it’s not 100% perfect match, but
I’ve been using it for some time to format multi-line macros, e.g. pool_foreach
and it’s been doing a pretty good job. Config file for that is already in vpp
source tree (vpp/.clang-format) and used as default for cpp
sion has different tab defaults from the
> indent default currently used in VPP (never use and 4 space vs always use and
> 8 space).
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>> On Apr 18, 2020, at 7:55 AM, Klement Sekera via lists.fd.io
>> wrote:
>>
>> clang-format
Hi Alexander,
thanks for your feedback. The concept of user was really used for quickly
re-using existing sessions in NAT. With port-overloading, ports are no longer a
precious resource and dropping “users” means not having to maintain an extra
hash table.
To better understand your problem, ca
Hi Alexander,
Understood. So when you get those sessions, what do you do with them?
Thanks,
Klement
> On 12 May 2020, at 13:45, Alexander Chernavin via lists.fd.io
> wrote:
>
> Hello Klement,
>
> I want to list all NAT sessions. In order to do that I used to call
> VL_API_NAT44_USER_DUMP.
Alexander,
It seems that fixing existing API is a huge pain. What we could do is implement
an API which dumps all the sessions and the client app could sort it out. How
many sessions do you typically have? As by default APIs run in a stop-the-world
state, having millions of sessions will stop a
ED NAT no longer has “user” concept and it doesn’t differentiate one session
from another. (So technically the API works just fine). Even if we wanted to
recreate that information it means to build a hash of “users” on the fly for
API purpose, do the dump and then throw it away. I don’t see any
Hi Miklos,
thanks for your message. If is_non_first_fragment is set to true then rewrite
will not happen. Can you take a look at what happens in ip4_sv_reass_inline for
the first packet/fragment?
Setting that flag should be pretty fool-proof
498 const u32 fragment_first = ip4_get_
I think it’s enough if instead of vlib_buffer_get_current(b0) we just use ip0
(that already takes save_rewrite_length into consideration). Can you please
test with this modification?
Thanks,
Klement
> On 26 May 2020, at 11:51, Miklos Tirpak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think there is a problem in ip
Thanks! I’ll push a patch.
Regards,
Klement
> On 26 May 2020, at 12:33, Miklos Tirpak wrote:
>
> Yes, it works with ip0:
>
> vnet_buffer (b0)->ip.reass.is_non_first_fragment =
>! !ip4_get_fragment_offset (ip0);
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
> From: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECH SRO at
Hey,
swapping context makes no sense since context is for client - client generates
whatever context it wants and vpp just copies it from request to response, so
that client can match response with request. So there is no reason for client
to swap it when sending the message and then swap it ba
Hi,
as you can see almost all of NAT sessions are timed out. NAT will automatically
free and reuse them when needed again.
this line:
> udp LRU min session timeout 5175 (now 161589)
hints whether immediate reuse is possible. Minimum session timeout in the LRU
list for UDP sessions is 5175, whil
Hi Carlito,
For ED NAT it doesn’t, as ED NAT no longer has any “user” concept. The code for
different flavours of NAT needs to be split and polished anyway. Idea is to
have data/code/APIs separate where appropriate.
Thanks,
Klement
> On 2 Jun 2020, at 20:31, Carlito Nueno wrote:
>
> Hi Kleme
Transitory means that the session has not been fully established.
Transitory (wait-closed) means the session has been established and then closed
and it’s in transitory timeout, after which it will move to transitory
(closed). Sessions in this state are not eligible for freeing.
Transitory (close
Hi,
the issue was caused by a missing memset in shared memory allocation routine.
After a few runs, newly allocated message in shared memory would no longer be
zero, but random garbage as left over by previous messages, this was then used
by vapi_c_test leading to crash.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r
Hi,
just amend the commit message and add it by hand. Commit message must contain a
line like
Type: fix
or
Type: improvement
or whatever is applicable.
Regards,
Klement
> On 24 Jun 2020, at 10:31, Chinmaya Aggarwal wrote:
>
> After i commit my fix, i run the script ./extras/scripts/check
Type: fix needs to be on a separate line. Take a look at other commit messages
for examples.
> On 24 Jun 2020, at 10:42, Chinmaya Aggarwal wrote:
>
> Still not working for me. I executed
> git commit -s --amend -m 'Type: fix sr: fix for SID index across segment
> lists within a sr policy'
>
Hi,
I created a debugging patch set https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13122/ which
hints that there is something fishy going on with the python
virtualenv.
Per https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/12067/consol
e:
10:21:46 make -C test TEST_DIR=/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
ubuntu16
We're one csit induced recheck away from getting this fixed.
On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 14:30 +, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
> Any updates on the latest status?
>
> -Maciek
>
> >
> > On 22 Jun 2018, at 18:07, Ole Troan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 13188 is already merge
Hi,
I agree that there is an unlikely corner case which could result in vpp
assert. I don't think there is a real chance to hit this in a
production image, since it would require you to successfully make two
API calls (drop old entry, replace with new entry) while there are
packets in flight. Just
Hi,
can you please run in gdb (or open core) and pass us a stack trace?
Thanks,
Klement
On Sun, 2018-07-01 at 19:36 -0700, xpa...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to understand how works VOM wrapper for C++ API.
> VOM manager header: https://pastebin.com/BgG7td5s
> VOM manager cpp: https:/
Hi,
this should fix your issue
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13349/
Thanks,
Klement
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 13:57 +0300, Alexander Gryanko wrote:
> Stack trace for thread 2:
>
> Thread 2 "main" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7fffedbff700 (LWP 814141)]
> 0x7529c42
Hi,
it looks like the problem is in ip.api file, and the api generator
complains that there is a syntax error. Maybe you made a merging
mistake?
Thanks,
Klement
On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 10:02 +0800, liumao...@telincn.com wrote:
> hello ksekera :
> i add your merged code for ipv/6 reassembly
What exactly is the issue? According to vapi_dispatch() docstring this
is expected:
/**
* @brief loop vapi_dispatch_one until responses to all currently
outstanding
* requests have been received and their callbacks called
*
* @note the dispatch loop is interrupted if any error is encountered
o
Hi Chetan,
I think that in this case it's better to use blocking interface, as you
are waiting for the events to come.
You can take a look at test/ext/vapi_c_test.c - tests called
test_stats_1, _2 & _3 deal with stats - first two show a blocking,
efficient interface, third one is non-blocking, w
Hi Damjan,
it seems that the test-debug target is broken with the patch. The build
process triggered by test-debug target jumps on the cmake train, but
that train doesn't bring in the APIGEN and other stuff (e.g.
libvppapiclient.so).
I don't see vpp-api mentioned in src/CMakeLists.txt. Should it
Yes, this causes test-debug target to take the old way (not cmake).
This, though, seems a bit counter-intuitive. Shouldn't setting the
value to "no" cause the build process to not use cmake?
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 12:15 +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
> >
> > On 20 Aug 2018, at 11:55, Klement Sekera
Hi Martin,
Can you describe your use case?
You're looking at the correct place regarding the matching criteria.
Adding the DSCP as additional criteria is not hard. Apart from API
functions, definition and CLI funtions, it just needs to be added to a
couple of comparison functions.
Similarly, add
You can also check out the test/ext directory for vapi_c_test.c and
vapi_cpp_test.cpp, which are unittests for these bindings and there is
also an example of _dump API call.
Regards,
Klement
Quoting Ole Troan (2018-09-13 09:33:14)
> Hi again,
>
> > I am in the beginning of using-c-api. Shou
what is your api prefix set in the vapi_connect call? is vpp using the
same prefix?
Quoting Ole Troan (2018-09-13 18:35:29)
> > 1、as root, install the rpm(vpp-selinux, vpp-lib, vpp-18.04, vpp-plugins),
> > start service vpp and I come into vppctl.
> > 2、I copy test/ext/vapi_c_test.c to main.c(a
And what is your vpp cmdline? is vpp running with "my-api-test" api
prefix?
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-09-14 07:25:06)
>sorry，
> That my carelessness. Whole cmd as root is : #./test "/my-api"
>"my-api-test"
>And vpp_api_test can connect to vpp.
>
>--
There is no such parameter called `chroot_prefix`. I will assume you are
asking about `api_prefix`.
Running VPP creates shared memory segments under /dev/shm. By default
(no prefix provided), these files are called global_vm and vpe-api.
Multiple VPP instances' names would collide and to be able t
If you do not consume a message (in this case most probably the reply to
vapi_tap_deelte), then on disconnect, the client library does that internally
and prints a warning about it...
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-09-17 12:00:27)
>Hi Klement,
> Please accept my heartfelt thanks.
>
Hi,
VAPI is autogenerated from .json files, which are generated from .api
files. The API you are asking about is in
src/vnet/classify/classify.api. See that file's history on when it
appeared. As for your second question - I don't see any `obscure-mask`
nor `clear-param` parameters. If you are ask
Maybe it's something which the older compiler wasn't able to compile.
Since the VAPI tests are not part of basic tests, it happens regularly,
that something is added to API files, which the vapi compiler can't
handle. But extended tests are not run as part of verify, so it gets
merged anyway ...
O
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-09-19 10:03:40)
>I find the feature of the absent vapi.
>There exists VALs in ***.api.
What is `VAL`?
>I copy the
>master's [1]src/vpp-api/vapi/vapi_c_gen.py and
> [2]src/vpp-api/vapi/vapi_json_parser.py to
>stable/1804,
>but compile fa
Hi Xue,
I'm not sure what protocol message you mean. Can you please elaborate or
point to RFC number & section which describes the message you're
interested in?
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting xyxue (2018-09-25 09:48:58)
>Hi guys��
>I��m testing the bfd . Is the bfd support protocol message?
>
Hi Kingwel,
thanks for finding this bug. Your patch looks fine - would you mind
making a similar fix in ip4_reassembly.c? The logic suffers from the
same flaw there.
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Kingwel Xie (2018-09-25 11:06:49)
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I worked on testing IP reassembly recently, t
Thanks,
>Xue
>
>--
>
>
> From: [1]Klement Sekera via Lists.Fd.Io
> Date: 2018-09-25 16:57
> To: [2]薛欣颖; [3]vpp-dev
> CC: [4]vpp-dev
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] question about bfd protocol message
&
Hey,
The reason why your name doesn't match the request is related to your
code mixing vl_msg_id_t with vapi_msg_id_t. VPP internally assignes
message IDs at startup based on it's runtime configuration - plugins. If
a plugin is not loaded, it's API messages aren't loaded either. On the
other hand,
getting a message without sending one is probably because of keepalive
messages, which vapi doesn't handle automatically in your version.
newer versions support automatic handling of keepalive messages by
supplying the appropriate parameter to vapi_connect to do so.
regarding tunnel_if_index - can
Hi,
sadly, no, because the underlying low-level library uses global variables.
Regards,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-11-07 13:52:39)
>Hi all,
> Can i create more than 1 connection using vapi_connect in my program ?
>ctx was defined at .so (more than 1)
>
>-
Hi Vijay,
yes, it's planned.
Regards,
Klement
Quoting Vijayabhaskar Katamreddy via Lists.Fd.Io (2018-11-11 23:56:37)
>Hi
>
>
>
>Is there any plans or any work in progress to extend the support for ipsec
>encrypt nodes to support the chained buffers?
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
Hi,
if you ask vapi to handle keepalives for you, why would you want to get
callbacks for them?
Regards,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-11-13 07:27:33)
>Hi��
> At vpp stable/18.10, using vapi_connect to connect vpp and set the
>"bool handle_keepalives " to true,
>Bu
it's shared memory, unless vpp dies there is no reason for the
connection to go down. if required, I would suggest you send periodic
control pings.
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-11-14 02:12:07)
>worried that the connection might break.
>
>-
Hi all,
I'm seeing failures on master branch on ubuntu 18.04 when invoking `make
test-ext`
FAILURES AND ERRORS IN TESTS:
Testcase name: VCL Cut Thru Tests
FAILURE: run VCL cut thru uni-directional (multiple sockets) test
Testcase name: L2BD Test Case
ERROR: L2BD MAC learning dual
>VCL IPv6 Thru Host Stack Extended D Tests
>
> ======
> run VCL thru host stack uni-directional (multiple sockets) test
>OK
>
>Ran 28 tests in 250.800s
>
>OK
>
>
> ==
latest test framework changes, are we running
> multiple tests/vpps in parallel? I suspect that may be a source of issues.
>
> Florin
>
> > On Nov 15, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Klement Sekera via Lists.Fd.Io
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing timeouts and coredumps
clang can format the macros just fine as they are. I added clang for
checking the style of c++ code (mainly vapi code). C files are still
checked using indent, which doesn't understand the macros ... Also I
wasn't able to come up with a clang-format which matches the current
indent style 1:1 so I d
lures. However this:
>
> make test-ext TEST=vcl.VCLCutThruTestCase.test_vcl_cut_thru_uni_dir_nsock
>
> runs just fine. After the latest test framework changes, are we running
> multiple tests/vpps in parallel? I suspect that may be a source of issues.
>
> Florin
>
>
er of
> failures. However this:
>
> make test-ext TEST=vcl.VCLCutThruTestCase.test_vcl_cut_thru_uni_dir_nsock
>
> runs just fine. After the latest test framework changes, are we running
> multiple tests/vpps in parallel? I suspect that may be a source of issues.
>
> Flo
Can you please post the CLI commands which result in such state?
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-12-03 04:12:55)
>hi all,
> The ipsec Node generated by Ikev2 still existing after deleting the
>ikev2 profile, how can I delete it?
>Thanks!
>
>-
iked2 code in vpp is PoC quality, so bugs are to be expected. Feel free
to submit a patch to fix the issue.
You could also try strongswan solution using this plugin
https://github.com/matfabia/strongswan/tree/vpp/src/libcharon/plugins/kernel_vpp
Regards,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (20
ipsec_sad_add_del_entry API - udp_encap parameter must be set to 1
Regards,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-12-06 02:16:35)
>hi Klement,
> which api? Thanks
>
>--
>
>wangchuan...@163.com
>
>
I don't think that the current PoC ikev2 code can do that.
Regards,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-12-06 11:29:12)
>Klement,
> i saw the ipsec_sad_add_del_entry api , but in my mind, it was used to
>create manual ipsec tunnel .
>how to set the ipsec tunnel negotiate
Hi Mikado,
if the fragments get split between multiple workers, then eventually
they'll get dropped after timing out ...
Regards,
Klement
Quoting Mikado (2018-12-11 08:52:28)
>Hi,
>
> I have noticed that “ip4-reassembly-feature” node only
>reassembles packets stored in the l
That's as it is now. A rework of the code is planned, no ETA yet...
Quoting mik...@yeah.net (2018-12-12 02:05:40)
>W...What??? So the only way to make ip reassembly working correctly is to
>keep one or more interfaces attached to a single worker thread?
>That does not sound efficient
The test framework spawns vpp with only one main thread and no workers.
I had a patch which uses also worker threads but it never made it to
git. It's grossly outdated by now.
Anyhow, I don't think that's really possible with the current packet
geneator implementation.
Quoting pvi...@vinciconsult
Is this with https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16548/ merged?
Quoting Juraj Linkeš (2018-12-20 12:09:12)
>Hi Klement and vpp-dev,
>
>
>
>[1]https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1522 fixed the issue with an assert we've
>been seeing with random reassembly, however, there's still some other
>
Hi Paul,
I believe it's okay to just add people as reviewers afterwards.
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Paul Vinciguerra (2019-01-03 18:16:42)
>I am working on a change to cleanup some anti-patterns in the test
>framework code, but the scope is significantly larger.
>[1]https://gerrit.fd.
Hi,
I see the issue, will come up with a patch shortly.
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Jan Gelety via Lists.Fd.Io (2019-01-30 10:22:18)
>Hello vpp-dev team,
>
>
>
>Our csit performance tests for Ipsec using aes-gcm ciphering started to
>fail because created ipsec interface cannot get
Can you please try this patch and let me know if it fixes things for you?
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/17163
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Klement Sekera via Lists.Fd.Io (2019-01-30 11:08:12)
> Hi,
>
> I see the issue, will come up with a patch shortly.
>
> Thanks,
> Klement
>
>
What kind of message are you sending?
You can take a look at /test/ext/vapi_c_test.c (or cpp) for example
code.
Quoting mhemmatp via Lists.Fd.Io (2019-02-12 15:07:12)
> Hello all,
>
> I am going to use vapi to connect to a plugin in vpp. I am following this
>instruction:
>
> 1- c
Your outlined procedure looks okay..
Maybe share some code?
Quoting mhemmatp via Lists.Fd.Io (2019-02-12 22:30:34)
>Klement, thanks for your reply, our conversation was invisible to group I
>posted it here.
>
>In general, in the procedure that I sent do you see a missing part to send
Hello,
I'm facing an issue with osleap job, it very frequently fails with
12:56:59 'indent' is already installed.
12:56:59 No update candidate for 'indent-2.2.11-lp150.1.5.x86_64'. The
highest available version is already installed.
12:56:59 'python3-rpm-macros' not found in package names. Trying
Hi,
there was an attempt at this some time ago, but the patch was never
merged and the infra has changed a lot in meanwhile so I don't think
it's worth it to rebase it. The patch was to run every existing test in
both single and multi worker scenarios.
You could probably extend the concept of ext
Hi all,
I noticed a job getting a +1 even though some of the builds failed ...
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18444/
please note patch set 9
fd.io JJB
Patch Set 9: Verified-1 Build Failed
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-arm-verify-master-ubuntu1804/2459/ :
FAILURE No problems were identified. I
Hi Murthy,
yes it does. Code is in ip4_sv_reass.c or ip4_full_reass.c. First one is
shallow reassembly (as in, know 5 tuple for all fragments with having to
actually reassemble them), second one is full reassembly.
Regards,
Klement
> On 1 Jul 2020, at 14:41, Satya Murthy wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
>
Hi Satya,
it’s also necessary to enable full reassembly feature along with your feature
by calling ip4_full_reass_enable_disable_with_refcnt().
You can take a look at NAT code which already does that -
snat_interface_add_del().
Regards,
Klement
> On 4 Sep 2020, at 14:48, Satya Murthy wrote:
Hi Satya,
so this is obviously unfinished. Would you mind writing the code for that? You
just need to steal a piece of code from ip4_sv_reass.c to do that ;-) and then
steer your packets at custom node.
986 /* *INDENT-OFF* */
987 VLIB_REGIS
That’s a very good point. Looking at vnet_buffer, there seems to be some space
left in it for this case …
190 struct
191 {
Hi Nick,
NAT doesn’t do any periodic cleanups, relying on a LRU list to reap stale
sessions. This is by design, as it avoids hickups in traffic rate.
Observed behaviour with session moving to WAIT-CLOSED and then CLOSED state is
based on RFC, there is no assumption whether FIN/ACK was actually
Hi,
can you please check out/try out this patch to see if it suits your needs?
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/28739
Currently there is no easy way to write a unit test for it, would be nice to
have it confirmed that it works.
Thanks,
Klement
> On 8 Sep 2020, at 19:34, Satya Murthy wrote:
Hi,
I don’t. I can eventually write one of course. Or maybe you’d like to give it a
try? It should be almost 1:1 to ip4 change …
Thanks,
Klement
> On 9 Nov 2020, at 11:18, Satya Murthy wrote:
>
> Hi Klement,
>
> Do you have the similar changes for ip6_full_reassembly.c as well.
> If so, Ca
Hi Elias,
I’ve already debugged this and came to the conclusion that it’s the infra which
is the weak link. I was seeing congestion drops at mild load, but not at full
load. Issue is that with handoff, there is uneven workload. For simplicity’s
sake, just consider thread 1 handing off all the t
7:51, Marcos - Mgiga wrote:
>>
>> So you mean that this situation ( congestion drops) is most likely to occur
>> when the system in general is idle than when it is processing a large amount
>> of traffic?
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Marcos
>>
>
ucing the number of VPP threads as an option to work this
> issue around, since you would probably increase the vector rate per thread?
>
> Best Regards
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Em nome de Klement Sekera via
> lists.fd.io
> Enviada em: se
ates around 255, I did see packet drops, but no congestion drops.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Klement
>>
>>> On 13 Nov 2020, at 17:51, Marcos - Mgiga wrote:
>>>
>>> So you mean that this situation ( congestion drops) is most likely to occur
>>> when t
Hi Elias,
thanks for getting back with some real numbers. I only tested with two workers
and a very simple case and in my case, increasing queue size didn’t help one
bit. But again, in my case there was 100% handoff rate (every single packet was
going through handoff), which is most probably th
Hi Elias,
mentioned formula was updated per guidance from Damjan: optimal number of
bihash buckets is number of expected entries divided by 2.5 rounded to closest
pow2 (might he higher or lower).
Regarding memory usage: bihash code has been changed and now uses main heap.
Consequently, it igno
Hi,
memory settings are gone from startup.conf. As I already mentioned, those were
pointless anyway as the tables now reside in main heap. Translation hash
buckets are calculated automatically based on max sessions and max users
parameters.
Thanks,
Klement
> On 26 Nov 2020, at 21:50, Damjan M
t;
> Best regards
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Em nome de Klement Sekera via
> lists.fd.io
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 26 de novembro de 2020 18:16
> Para: Marcos - Mgiga
> Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io;
> dmar...@me.com
> Assunto: Re:
I like the idea.
Regarding maintainer pain:
Q: are we now stuck forever with what we have because there will always be
somebody facing some difficulties adopting?
Thanks,
Klement
> On 2 Dec 2020, at 10:30, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2 Dec 2020, at 10:27, Neale Ranns via lists.fd.
Hi Elias,
what is the point of such static mapping? What is the use case here?
Thanks,
Klement
> On 2 Dec 2020, at 16:39, Elias Rudberg wrote:
>
> One scenario when this happens is when a UDP (or TCP) packet is sent
> from a client on the inside with a destination IP address that matches
> an
Hi Elias,
so there are two ways of solving this:
1. don’t support such a static mapping (i.e. refuse to create it)
2. make it work
for #2 your snat_hairpinning fix might be the right idea. If there is really no
change then there is no point doing an extra lookup right?
Would you mind pushing i
I can’t see how that could help as this is not a fragmented packet … ?
Thanks,
Klement
> On 2 Dec 2020, at 23:57, Mrityunjay Kumar wrote:
>
> Guys, I am not sure , my input is helpful or not but the same issue was
> triggered to me and we concluded it in a different way.
> In your packet trac
Hi, let me chime in and explain a bit more.
DET NAT also known as CGNAT (as in carrier-grade NAT) is designed to conform to
LI (lawful intercept) requirements.
So, if you, as an internet provider are required by law to be able to provide a
user identification based on outside address + port mad
I see, so you’re not using deterministic NAT. Which NAT flavour are you using?
I think what you are requesting is not provided by VPP at this moment, but
looking at the allocation algorithm, it might be possible to implement such
behaviour. It should be relatively straightforward in EI NAT and a
Hey,
just a heads up - there is a similar request to yours which came from a
different direction. I’ll be making a change which I think will help your
situation as well. Stay tuned.
Regards,
Klement
> On 22 Feb 2021, at 10:00, Юрий Иванов wrote:
>
> Hello Klement,
>
> Thanks for reply.
> Lo
Hi all,
I implemented a new debug option for make test called ‘attach’. This has been
requested a couple of times over the last few months and while it has some
drawbacks, it also has advantages.
It’s not merged yet.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/31663
As always make test-help is full of clu
papi executor class. The test
> cases depend on the vppapiclient and the stats client. They should be the
> only dependencies in the base class, anything else is a concrete
> implementation detail.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:35 PM Klement Sekera via
Hi all,
I’ve introduced a new checkstyle target, which should ease development. This
one does a similar thing as test-checkstyle, but only on changed files. This is
useful for local verification as it’s a bit faster and doesn’t pollute your
screen with messages about checking unchanged files.
Hi Elias,
it’s spot on. I think all of it. Would you like to push an atomic-increment
patch or should I?
Thanks for spotting this!!!
Klement
> On 1 Apr 2021, at 13:39, Elias Rudberg wrote:
>
> Hello VPP experts,
>
> I think there is a thread safety issue in the NAT plugin regarding the
> cou
Hi Govind,
there is no explicit startup.conf used by test framework. All arguments are
passed using VPP command line built setUpConstants() function of VppTestCase.
Regards,
Klement
> On 23 Apr 2021, at 18:13, Govindarajan Mohandoss
> wrote:
>
> Dear Maintainers,
> I would like to enable a
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
