You can reference reassembly code, which does something similar. e.g. ip4_sv_reass.c
HTH, Klement > On 17 Apr 2020, at 18:03, Satya Murthy <satyamurthy1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi , > > We are having a scenario to support as below and we would like to know what > we are doing here is correct or not. > > 1. Our graph node receives a frame with TWO buffers > 2. Graph node decides to process FIRST buffer and enqueues the packet to a > next-node. > 3. Graph node decides to store the SECOND buffer index to process it after 10 > sec. Hence, it stores the second buffer index to a vector for later > processing. > 4. Graph node returns a value of 2 ( Is this correct ? or do we need to > return 1, since one buffer we want to consume at a later point of time ?) > 5. After 10 sec, we process the vector of buffer indices and process them to > send to another node. > 6. While sending to another node, we create a new frame and add this buffer > index to that. > > Basically, when a graph node want to consume a buffer for a later point of > time, is there anything specific we need to do ? > Or is it just enough to store the buffer index for a later use. > > Any inputs on this would help us in our design/implementation. > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Murthy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16097): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16097 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/73086166/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
