Dear Avinash,
First, please use public mailing list for such requests, instead of unicasting
people.
Regarding your patch, I don't feel comfortable to code review it, as I'm not
familiar with dpdk crypto scheduler.
Personally, I believe such things should be implemented as native VPP code
in
Hi Jon,
> Is it your intention to re-factor the changes in
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/14247
> to remove the FIB DPO and instead use an input feature?
Yes, that was the plan.
Of course we could keep the DPO code in there, and even make it a configuration
knob which one to choose.
> If so, it s
Hi Avinash,
I happened to look at the patch recently. To my understanding, it is valuable,
cool stuff, as it allows offloading crypto to other cpu cores. Therefore, more
throughput can be archieved. A question, you patched the dpdk ring to mp and
mc, why not mp and sc?
Hi Damjan,
I guess the
Hi Kingwei,
I agree this is useful feature, that's why i believe it should be implemented
as native code instead of relying on external implementation which is from our
perspective sub-optimal
due to dpdk dependency, time spent on buffer metadata conversion, etc..
--
Damjan
> On 17 Dec 2018,
Hello group,
This might be best answered by Matus since it regards NAT, but I'll throw it
out there for the whole group.
The endpoint-dependent feature of the NAT plugin – Endpoint address AND port
dependent I presume from the 6-tuple description of it – allows us to map the
same internal sour
> This might be best answered by Matus since it regards NAT, but I'll throw it
> out there for the whole group.
>
> The endpoint-dependent feature of the NAT plugin – Endpoint address AND port
> dependent I presume from the 6-tuple description of it – allows us to map the
> same internal source
Hi Ole,
Absolutely, Endpoint independent mapping is the safest bet, which is why it is
recommended. It is unfortunate that we cannot rely on services being IP source
agnostic or that STUN will be used.
Thus, even though Endpoint independent mapping can be considered non-efficient
in its address
Hi Damjan,
Yes, agree with you.
Here I got a thought about handoff mechanism in vPP. If looking into the DPDK
crypto scheduler, you will find out that it heavily depends on DPDK rings, for
buffer delivery among CPU cores and even for the packet reordering. Therefore,
something comes to my mind
Hi, VPP folks,
I am trying to add in support for a new card/driver.
The info on the DPDK website says the drivers I have should work fine.
Thus, the only issue is adding in the correct manufacturer/device IDs into
the init.c file:
src/plugins/dpdk/device/init.c
I edit the file (one-line chang
Hey Brian,
I believe it fetches it again because the file doesn't match the hash string
present in one of the files inside the dpdk directory. At least that was the
issue I faced building for Mellanox cards ages ago. You could also specify that
it uses an external DPDK source.
Sent from ny pho
Dear Kingwei,
I don't think VPP handoff is right solution for this problem. It can be solved
in much simpler way.
We can simply have simple ring by worker tthread where new packets pending
encryption/decryption are enqueued.
Then we can have input node which runs on all threads and polls those
Hi,
I want to test VPP NAT plugin performance in NAT44 dynamic translations mode
while supporting ipfix logging. (with 4 10gb ethernet interface , 40 CPU core
and 40gbps throughput)
based on VPP/NAT wiki page I used following configuration :
unix {
nodaemon
log /var/log/vpp/vpp.log
full
[Edited Message Follows]
Hi,
I want to test VPP NAT plugin performance in NAT44 dynamic translations mode
while supporting ipfix logging. (with 4 10gb ethernet interface , 40 CPU core
and 40gbps throughput)
based on VPP/NAT wiki page I used following configuration :
unix {
nodaemon
log /
Hi,
NAT plugin configuration look good for me.
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of
david.leitch@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:27 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] Config NAT plugin for with dynamic translations
[Edited Message Follows]
Hi,
I want to t
if I config vpp without NAT (just routing) it works , but When Config for NAT I
have rx-miss on all interfaces.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11647): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11647
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/
even without ipfix enabled?
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of
david.leitch@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:47 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Config NAT plugin for with dynamic translations
if I config vpp without NAT (just routing) it works , but
Hi Brian,
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 20:19 -0800, Brian Dickson wrote:
> Hi, VPP folks,
> I am trying to add in support for a new card/driver.
>
> The info on the DPDK website says the drivers I have should work fine.
>
> Thus, the only issue is adding in the correct manufacturer/device IDs into the
>
yes, When ipfix disabled i have rx-miss
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11650): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11650
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28790237/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: htt
Hi,
Endpoint-dependent NAT is not default behaviour, when you want to use
endpoint-dependent NAT you need to adjust startup config
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/NAT#NAT44
Matus
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of JB
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 12:02 AM
To: Ole
And no tx packets form the beginning?
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of
david.leitch@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:57 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Config NAT plugin for with dynamic translations
yes, When ipfix disabled i have rx-miss
-=-=-=-
20 matches
Mail list logo
