Hi Avinash, I happened to look at the patch recently. To my understanding, it is valuable, cool stuff, as it allows offloading crypto to other cpu cores. Therefore, more throughput can be archieved. A question, you patched the dpdk ring to mp and mc, why not mp and sc?
Hi Damjan, I guess the native ipsec mb plugin doesnot support offloading? Or maybe we can do a handoff, but anyhow we can not handoff one ipsec session to multi cores. Am I right? Regards, Kingwel -------- 原始邮件 -------- 主题： Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15084/: 来自： "Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io" <dmarion=me....@lists.fd.io> 发至： 2018年12月17日 下午4:45 抄送： "Gonsalves, Avinash (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <avinash.gonsal...@nokia.com> Dear Avinash, First, please use public mailing list for such requests, instead of unicasting people. Regarding your patch, I don't feel comfortable to code review it, as I'm not familiar with dpdk crypto scheduler. Personally, I believe such things should be implemented as native VPP code instead. We are already in process of moving from DPDK AES-NI into native code (still dependant on ipsec MB lib) so this stuff will not be much usable in this form anyway. But this is just my opinion, will leave it to others... -- Damjan On 13 Dec 2018, at 05:52, Gonsalves, Avinash (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) <avinash.gonsal...@nokia.com<mailto:avinash.gonsal...@nokia.com>> wrote: Hi Dave, Damjan, This was verified earlier, but didn’t get integrated. Could you please have a look? Thanks, Avinash
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11635): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11635 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28779969/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
