Re: [vpp-dev] Make test help

Thanks Klement. > -Original Message- > From: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) > > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:00 AM > To: Govindarajan Mohandoss > Cc: vpp-dev ; nd > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make test help > > Hi Govind, > >

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test help

Hi Govind, there is no explicit startup.conf used by test framework. All arguments are passed using VPP command line built setUpConstants() function of VppTestCase. Regards, Klement > On 23 Apr 2021, at 18:13, Govindarajan Mohandoss > wrote: > > Dear Maintainers, > I would like to enable a

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-checkstyle-diff

+1  Very nice! Thanks, -daw- On 3/25/2021 5:39 AM, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote: Hi Klement, This is very cool! Thanks a lot for doing it! --a On 25 Mar 2021, at 10:29, Klement Sekera via lists.fd.io wrote: Hi all, I’ve introduced a new checkstyle target, which should ease development. Thi

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-checkstyle-diff

Hi Klement, This is very cool! Thanks a lot for doing it! --a > On 25 Mar 2021, at 10:29, Klement Sekera via lists.fd.io > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’ve introduced a new checkstyle target, which should ease development. This > one does a similar thing as test-checkstyle, but only on changed

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Both aarch64 & x86_64 jobs completed successfully: https://jenkins.fd.io/sandbox/job/daw_30773-vpp-verify-master-ubuntu2004-aarch64/5/ https://jenkins.fd.io/sandbox/job/daw_30773-vpp-verify-master-ubuntu2004-x86_64/4/ Thanks, -daw- On 2/12/2021 8:50 AM, Dave Wallace via lists.fd.io wrote: Grea

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Great! I will retest with the latest changes and report back. Thanks, -daw- On 2/12/2021 8:41 AM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: Hi Dave, Your patch fixed the issue [0] (x86_64 passes too)! Great! I updated it with more fixes and debug checks: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/31240 and abandone

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Hi Dave, > Your patch fixed the issue [0] (x86_64 passes too)! Great! I updated it with more fixes and debug checks: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/31240 and abandoned the change 31241 (which I have merged with 31240 instead). Best ben > Thanks, > -daw- > > [0] https://jenkins.fd.io/sandbox/

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Ben, Your patch fixed the issue [0] (x86_64 passes too)! Thanks, -daw- [0] https://jenkins.fd.io/sandbox/job/daw_30773-vpp-verify-master-ubuntu2004-aarch64/4/ https://jenkins.fd.io/sandbox/job/daw_30773-vpp-verify-master-ubuntu2004-x86_64/3/ On 2/11/2021 3:06 PM, Dave Wallace via lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Ben, Excellent debugging work! I will rebase my gerrit change onto yours, retest in the Jenkins Sandbox, and report back. Thanks, -daw- On 2/11/21 2:18 PM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: Hi Dave, There are still 6 ikev2 test failures from this test run that need to be resolved. I identified

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Wow, this is a great catch, Ben! Kudos! 👍 --a > On 11 Feb 2021, at 20:18, Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > >> There are still 6 ikev2 test failures from this test run that need to be >> resolved. > > I identified the issue: undefined behaviour + aggressive gcc o

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Hi Dave, > There are still 6 ikev2 test failures from this test run that need to be > resolved. I identified the issue: undefined behaviour + aggressive gcc optimization. The tentative fix is here: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/31240 Note that for this to happen, you need both: - compile with

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

;Paul Vinciguerra' Cc: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; 'Ole Troan' ; 'vpp-dev' ; 'Juraj Linkeš' Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64 Verified that the fix resolves the Bihash test failure (rebased 30734): https://logs.fd.io/sandbox/vex-yul-ro

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Troan' > ; 'vpp-dev' ; 'Juraj Linkeš' > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64 > > Verified that the fix resolves the Bihash test failure (rebased 30734): > > https://logs.fd.io/sandbox/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-2/daw_30773-

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

Troan ; Dave Wallace ; vpp-dev ; Juraj Linkeš *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64 Hi Dave, test_cli.py verifies the timeout checking code is working. The groundwork to clean up the framework can be found here.  [0] The test framework cannot distinguish between a

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

rra >> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 1:31 PM >> To: Dave Barach >> Cc: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; Ole Troan >> ; Dave Wallace ; vpp-dev >> ; Juraj Linkeš >> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64 >> >> Hi Dave, >> >&

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

right size hammer for this specific problem. FWIW... Dave *From:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *On Behalf Of *Paul Vinciguerra *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2021 1:31 PM *To:* Dave Barach *Cc:* Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; Ole Troan ; Dave Wallace ; vpp-dev ; Juraj Linkeš *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Make test

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Paul Vinciguerra Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 1:31 PM To: Dave Barach Cc: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; Ole Troan ; Dave Wallace ; vpp-dev ; Juraj Linkeš Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64 Hi Dave, test_cli.py verifies the

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Benoit Ganne > (bganne) via lists.fd.io > Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:06 AM > To: Dave Barach ; 'Ole Troan' ; > 'Dave Wallace' ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Cc: 'Juraj Linkeš' > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make tes

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

ful 0 verbose 0", timeout=15) Please advise... Thanks... Dave -Original Message- From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:06 AM To: Dave Barach ; 'Ole Troan' ; 'Dave Wallace' ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc:

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

h > Sent: mardi 9 février 2021 12:47 > To: 'Ole Troan' ; 'Dave Wallace' > ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Cc: 'Juraj Linkeš' > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64 > > Would be glad to take a look at the aarch64 bihash failure, mo

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

:20 AM To: Dave Wallace ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc: Juraj Linkeš Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64 And just to be clear, the failing tests are in the QUIC, bihash and IKEv2 features. > [4] https://logs.fd.io/sandbox/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-2/daw_30773_31019-v

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ubuntu-20.04 AARCH64

And just to be clear, the failing tests are in the QUIC, bihash and IKEv2 features. > [4] > https://logs.fd.io/sandbox/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-2/daw_30773_31019-vpp-verify-master-ubuntu2004-aarch64/4/ > vpp-unittest-QUICEchoIntMStreamTestCase-f5ywwo0l-FAILED > vpp-unittest-TestBihash-_iohsbt

Re: [vpp-dev] make test - Python3 update

I agree with both of Balaji's comments. Ole, thank you for cleaning up the tests to make them work under Python 3.6 ! Based on the discussion during the last community meeting, I don't see any reason not to make python 3.6 the default and leave the 2.7 support in place for a while until in c

Re: [vpp-dev] make test - Python3 update

Hi Ole, Appreciate all the efforts! Any reason why we shouldn’t make PYTHON=python3.6 the default option? That way, we would enforce development here on is 3.6 compliant. Thanks much! — Regards, Balaji. On Oct 22, 2019, at 1:56 AM, Ole Troan wrote:  All, You might have seen the raft of python3

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL

De : au nom de Juraj Linkeš Date : jeudi 27 septembre 2018 à 09:21 À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc : vpp-dev Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL Hi Neale, I had a debugging session with Andrew about failing ACL testca

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL

> On 27 Sep 2018, at 09:21, Juraj Linkeš wrote: > > Hi Neale, > > I had a debugging session with Andrew about failing ACL testcases and he > uncovered that the root cause is in l2 and ip4: > 1) the timeout and big files > > for some reason in the bridged setup done by a testcase, the VPP re

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL

Hi Neale, I had a debugging session with Andrew about failing ACL testcases and he uncovered that the root cause is in l2 and ip4: 1) the timeout and big files for some reason in the bridged setup done by a testcase, the VPP reinjects the packet being sent onto one of the interfaces of the bri

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL

I created the new tickets under CSIT, which is an oversight, but I fixed it and now the tickets are under VPP: *GRE crash *SCTP failure/crash o Me and Marco resolved a similar issue in the past, but this c

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On machines that I see test failures -- sometimes, frequently, they disappear when I use make test-debug rather than make test. Burt On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Klement Sekera wrote: > > > > Ooo, I see... So, yeah, I have to hop between a local branch and > the > > upstream master,

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

> > Ooo, I see... So, yeah, I have to hop between a local branch and the > upstream master, > so I may be being victimized by this problem. I've been doing a "make > wipe" or "wipe-release" > and forgot about the industrial 'git clean'. Drat. I'll give that a > run... > >

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > >> >> > >> > git clean -d -f -x . >> > and rebuilding everything fixes the issue >> > >> > Let me know if you see a different issue... >> > > Ooo, I see... So, yeah, I have to hop between

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

> I can't believe I've read a sentence with the words "good ideas" and "GNU > autotools" in it. :-) At this point I'm also open to bad ideas. ;-) I started looking at how to add -M to vppapigen and then integrate it with depcomp. Cheers, Ole -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all mes

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > > I debugged this a bit further and it seems that sometimes when hopping > branches, the json files corresponding to APIs are not regenerated properly. > > What happens in vpp-papi is that if it founds a duplicate, it checks > whether it's the s

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > Hi Jon, > > > Just to confirm - what's your environment? > > Centos 7.4 jdl@bcc-1 $ uname -a Linux bcc-1 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 19:03:37 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/L

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

ine on my end - on Ubuntu 16.04. >> I also booted centos 7 in docker and the tests again passed fine. >> But, strangely enough, on Ubuntu 18.04, I see the issue. >> >> Just to confirm - what's your environment? >> >> Thanks, >> Klement >> >>>

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

s, Klement > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Klement Sekera > -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 11:23 PM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Cc: vpp-dev > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test faili

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

ts.fd.io On Behalf Of Jon Loeliger > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 9:16 PM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Cc: vpp-dev > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, > when NOT run as root. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Klement Sekera

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Burt Silverman wrote: > I believe the physmem/numa error is just to throw us off -- a code bug but > an innocuous one at least for non NUMA systems; Damjan would know more. > > Jon, I like your idea about it not quitting on the first error. And I > guess the "Fil

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > Can you please provide instructions to reproduce? > > I checked out latest master > I think we are not communicating. I checkout any top of tree commit over the past, oh three weeks or so, an

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

I believe the physmem/numa error is just to throw us off -- a code bug but an innocuous one at least for non NUMA systems; Damjan would know more. Jon, I like your idea about it not quitting on the first error. And I guess the "File Exists" error is also just something that happens after the "real

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

> -Original Message- > From: Jon Loeliger > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 4:23 PM > To: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > > Cc: vpp-dev > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, > when NOT run as root. >

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:33 AM, Klement Sekera wrote: > This looks kinda like you have old papi installed somewhere. > > Please try `make test-wipe` and let me know how it goes. > > Thanks, > Klement These are clean build of top-of-tree. The 'make test-wipe' has no effect. I think the proble

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

gt; To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, > when NOT run as root. > > +1. Definitely try "make test" as root, and let folks know how it goes... > > > > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

>> +1. Definitely try “make test” as root, and let folks know how it goes… >> >> >> >> *From:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *On Behalf Of *Damjan >> Marion >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:24 PM >> *To:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io >> *Cc:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

; *Cc:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple > machines, when NOT run as root. > > > > > > OK, this doesn't look like related to my issue. does it work with sudo? > So, yes. Even sudone, these remaining errors persist. Not sure what is at work here yet. jdl

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

+1. Definitely try "make test" as root, and let folks know how it goes... From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:24 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machi

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

OK, this doesn't look like related to my issue. does it work with sudo? > On 15 Mar 2018, at 21:58, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Damjan Marion > wrote: > > Should be fixed now, issue was happening when VPP was allocating buffer > m

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: > > Should be fixed now, issue was happening when VPP was allocating buffer > memory from 4K pages (running as non-root). > Damjan, It has gotten better, but I still see these: ==

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

Should be fixed now, issue was happening when VPP was allocating buffer memory from 4K pages (running as non-root). > On 13 Mar 2018, at 15:24, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Klement Sekera > wrote: > I would say that this should be worth t

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Klement Sekera wrote: > I would say that this should be worth the extra effort just to have the > same conditions. Otherwise the verify job does something different than > `make test` on your box and that could be confusing. > > Thanks, > Klement These days, 'ma

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

pp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ed Kern > (ejk) > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 1:18 AM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, > when NOT run as root. > > Cant/wont make assumptions or g

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

t need root at all... -Original Message- From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Dave Barach (dbarach) Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 8:46 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

Why does Jenkins run make test under root? Make test does not need root at all... > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Dave > Barach (dbarach) > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 8:46 PM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Sub

Re: [vpp-dev] make TEST=test_ip6 test failing on multiple machines, when NOT run as root.

Dave Wallace and I were chatting, and he jogged my memory: our Jenkins minions run "make test" as root. TEST=test_ip6 fails 100% of the time when run as a normal user. It passes when run as root. Would it be possible to fix this class of problem? Thanks. Dave From: Dave Barach (dbar

Re: [vpp-dev] make test patch failing on OpenSuse yum

Marco, Thanks for following up on this! -daw- On 02/21/2018 09:34 AM, Marco Varlese wrote: And yes, indeed, a patch added the below code into Jenkins which is obviously wrong. elif [ "${OS_ID}" == "opensuse" ]; then yum list installed pip list fi - Marco On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 15

Re: [vpp-dev] make test patch failing on OpenSuse yum

this is totally me…im on it.. apologies Ed On Feb 21, 2018, at 7:34 AM, Marco Varlese mailto:mvarl...@suse.de>> wrote: And yes, indeed, a patch added the below code into Jenkins which is obviously wrong. elif [ "${OS_ID}" == "opensuse" ]; then yum list installed pip list fi - Marc

Re: [vpp-dev] make test patch failing on OpenSuse yum

And yes, indeed, a patch added the below code into Jenkins which is obviously wrong. elif [ "${OS_ID}" == "opensuse" ]; then yum list installed pip list fi - Marco On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 15:19 +0100, Marco Varlese wrote: > So, since this whole thing looks suspicious... I have done a bi

Re: [vpp-dev] make test patch failing on OpenSuse yum

So, since this whole thing looks suspicious... I have done a bit of investigation on our GERRIT and... I see the last time that everything was GREEN was yesterday (Feb 20th) when a patch on openSUSE kicked off at 17:28pm (https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-ma ster-opensuse/1647/consoleFull). I a

Re: [vpp-dev] make test patch failing on OpenSuse yum

Hi Keith, On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 12:46 +, Keith Burns wrote: > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/10702/ > > Fails due to: > "01:58:10 AttributeError: 'RPMDBAdditionalData' object has no attribute > 'yumdb_cache'" > > > (ref: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/1658/console) > >

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

mber 14, 2017 1:27:47 PM >To: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); Ole >Troan >Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io >Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all >  >It does not complete within 20 minutes on other machines. > >> I don&#

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io on behalf of Brian Brooks Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 1:27:47 PM To: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); Ole Troan Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all It does not complete within 20 minutes on

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

, 2017 2:47 AM To: Ole Troan Cc: Dave Barach (dbarach) ; John Lo (loj) ; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Brian Brooks Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all It is ... it takes ~10 seconds to create 1000 subifs on a beefy UCS and the case tries to

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

un...@lists.fd.io] On > >> Behalf Of Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > >> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:27 AM > >> To: John Lo (loj) ; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - PANTHEON > >> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Brian &g

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

gt; Behalf Of Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) >> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:27 AM >> To: John Lo (loj) ; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - PANTHEON >> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Brian >> Brooks >> Subject: Re

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:27 AM > To: John Lo (loj) ; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - PANTHEON > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Brian > Brooks > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev]

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:27 AM To: John Lo (loj) ; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Brian Brooks Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all So it seems that vpp coredumps while dumping the

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

So it seems that vpp coredumps while dumping the API trace after creating all the interfaces... (gdb) bt #0 0x7f14f4b1e428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54 #1 0x7f14f4b2002a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 #2 0x00405d83 in os_panic () at

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

HEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > >Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 10:12:55 PM >To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Brian Brooks; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - > PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); John Lo (loj) >Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all >  >Hi Brian, &g

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

- PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 10:12:55 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Brian Brooks; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); John Lo (loj) Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all Hi Brian, it should. Though I just tried running it on latest master

Re: [vpp-dev] make test-all

Hi Brian, it should. Though I just tried running it on latest master and got a timeout in test_p2p_ethernet, which shouldn't happen. I see the test was trying to create tens of thousands of interfaces... maybe something is slower than usual? Thanks, Klement Quoting Brian Brooks (2017-11-11 01:11

Re: [vpp-dev] make test

Hi Holoo, running 'make test-help' should explain all the possibilities, including the one which you're asking about. Cheers, Klement Quoting Holoo Gulakh (2017-11-03 13:01:12) >Hi >I want to know is there any make <...> command to make just one special >test (for example test bmpls)