/Bangalore) ;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] VPP Review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15084/:
Hi Avinash,
My question about the MP/MC ring flag that you made a patch to DPDK, any
comments?
I’d like them to be MP/SC, as we always have only one consumer.
Regards,
Kingwel
From: vpp-dev
:33 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15084/:
Hi Damjan, Kingwel,
Most of the changes in the dpdk plugin is generic and works for other crypto
devices as well, so can we have this patch integrated while the design with VPP
Native support is
> handoff is always worthwhile in some case even there is penalty.
>
> Appreciate you can share your opinion.
>
> Regards,
> Kingwel
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Damjan Marion
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 1:03 AM
> To: Kingwel Xie
> Cc: Go
: Gonsalves, Avinash (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) ;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15084/:
Hi Kingwei,
I agree this is useful feature, that's why i believe it should be implemented
as native code instead of relying on external implementation whi
l
>
>
> 原始邮件 ----
> 主题： Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15084/:
> 来自： "Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io"
> 发至： 2018年12月17日 下午4:45
> 抄送： "Gonsalves, Avinash (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)"
>
> Dear Avinash,
>
> First, pl
native ipsec mb plugin doesnot support offloading? Or maybe we can
do a handoff, but anyhow we can not handoff one ipsec session to multi cores.
Am I right?
Regards,
Kingwel
原始邮件
主题： Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15084/:
来自： "Damjan Mario
Dear Avinash,
First, please use public mailing list for such requests, instead of unicasting
people.
Regarding your patch, I don't feel comfortable to code review it, as I'm not
familiar with dpdk crypto scheduler.
Personally, I believe such things should be implemented as native VPP code
in
