Re: [vpp-dev] [nsh_sfc-dev] Stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL

+1 for Hongjun From: a...@yunify.org [mailto:a...@yunify.org] Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 9:06 AM To: Zhou, Danny ; t...@lists.fd.io; nsh_sfc-...@lists.fd.io Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [nsh_sfc-dev] Stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL +1 Thanks for all your hard work! Ash Ash Young M

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] [nsh_sfc-dev] Stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL

...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 9:52 AM To: a...@yunify.org; Zhou, Danny ; t...@lists.fd.io; nsh_sfc-...@lists.fd.io Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: RE: [tsc] [nsh_sfc-dev] Stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL Hi Danny, Thanks for your contributions. I will let Ed correct me if I am wrong, I

[vpp-dev] Stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL

Hi TSC, I've been taking the NSH_SFC PTL role 1 year ago. It has been a pleasure, but also a burden as there are some personal reasons make me cannot focus on NSH_SFC anymore, so I am stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL with immediate effect. Additionally, I would like to nominate Hongjun Ni, who is th

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

About question “Could you provide some context around the PPPoE stuff and its importance to NFV solutions in ONAP?”, below is the answer: ONAP residential vCPE use case adopted VPP to build open source VNFs (e.g. vBRG, vBNG, vG MUX and vG), and currently ONAP R1 uses IPoE protocol instead of PP

[vpp-dev] vhost-user CNI plugin is open sourced to support VPP

Hi Folks, We just open sourced a vhost-user CNI plugin at https://github.com/intel/vhost-user-net-plugin. This Vhost User net plugin is a Container Network Interface (CNI) plugin for Kubernetes to enable DPDK accelerated vSwitch (e.g. VPP, OVS-DPDK) to accelerate container networking solution

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Communications library and LD_PRELOAD

Hi Keith, This is really interesting work! Does the vppcom library underneath the VCL supports inter-host communication? The iperf3 throughput data below is for the inter-container (essentially IPC over FIFO) on the same host, right? -Danny From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-bo

Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Thomas F Herbert Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:01 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP On 04/25/2017 04:45 AM, Zhou, Danny wrote: Thanks Pierre

Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP

Thanks Pierre, comments inline. From: Pierre Pfister (ppfister) [mailto:ppfis...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:11 PM To: Ni, Hongjun Cc: Zhou, Danny ; Ed Warnicke ; Li, Johnson ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP Le 25 avr

Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP

Share my two cents as well: Firstly, introducing GRE or whatever other tunneling protocols to LB introduces performance overhead (for encap and decap) to both the load balancer as well as the network service. Secondly, other mechanism on the network service node not only needs to decap the GRE

Re: [vpp-dev] [honeycomb-dev] 17.04 Features to highlight in press release

Below list the new features introduced to NSH_SFC 17.04. • NSH-aware VNFs by collocating NSH Proxy and SF (such as VPP’s SNAT plugin) • Initial MD Type 2 support • iOAM in NSH • NSH_SFC automation functional test integration with CSIT So together with available fea

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Re: Interesting perf test results from Red Hat's test team

Tom, more comments inline. From: Thomas F Herbert [mailto:therb...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:41 AM To: Zhou, Danny ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc: Karl Rister ; csit-...@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Re: Interesting perf test results from Red Hat's test team Hi

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Re: Interesting perf test results from Red Hat's test team

m Hi Thomas, Thanks for these interesting measurements. I am not quite sure I fully understand the different configurations and traffic cases you have been testing: * [Zhou, Danny] ToDo you vary the number of vhost-user queues to the guest and/or the number of RX queues for the phy port? These ar

Re: [vpp-dev] memif - packet memory interface

> -Original Message- > From: Damjan Marion (damarion) [mailto:damar...@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 5:06 PM > To: Zhou, Danny > Cc: vpp-dev > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] memif - packet memory interface > > > > On 17 Feb 2017, at 06:30, Zh

Re: [vpp-dev] memif - packet memory interface

Very Interesting... Damjan, Do you think if it makes sense to use virtio_user/vhost_user pairs to connect two VPPs instances running inside two container? Essentially, the memif and virtio_user/vhost_user pairs both leverage shared memory for fast inter-process communication, within similar p

Re: [vpp-dev] Does VPP support dynamic routing?

It works before with Bird and Quagga via Sandbox/router with DPDK 16.04 release, but seems build is broken for months and might need Jeff to fix it when he come back from vacation. From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Juan Salmon Sent: Saturday, De