Getting back to some of the topics,
The main concern about RST was to recover from a 3rd party sending RSTs into
the session.
This would require the sender to spoof the src IP, right?
Are you aware of any scenario when an RST followed by subsequent data could
happen during a "normal" session an
Hi,
> On 18 Mar 2022, at 12:18, otr...@employees.org wrote:
>
> Klement,
>
>>> Following up on this thread.
>>> The changes in 34877 led to some undesired behaviour in the "real
>>> world(tm)".
>>> In the close pattern below it left sessions in established state, and
>>> with
attempt to fix the bit
flags …
Thanks,
Klement
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Miklos Tirpak
Date: Monday, January 10, 2022 at 12:33 PM
To: vpp-dev , Miklós Tirpák
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] NAT44-ed state machine
Hi,
I have opened the review
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/34851
Hi,
I have opened the review https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/34851 for the first
issue, the [SYN, ACK] retransmission. Could you please have a look?
Thanks,
Miklos
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Miklos Tirpak via
lists.fd.io
Sent: Wednesday, January 5
Hi,
we have observed couple of problems with the NAT44-ed state machine and would
appreciate your advice to fix them. In our use case, the clients can have a
lossy connection, which results in retransmissions. In some cases, these
retransmissions do not seem to be handled correctly.
1. The
: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Miklos Tirpak via
lists.fd.io
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2020 6:37 PM
To: Paul Vinciguerra
Cc: otr...@employees.org ; Mohsin Kazmi (sykazmi)
; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] generic TCP MSS clamping
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the
, some more tests, cli command updates. I hope I can do this quickly.
Thanks,
Miklos
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of Miklos Tirpak
via lists.fd.io<http://lists.fd.io>
mailto:emnif
set in this code review with
some more changes: RX support, bugfix in clamping (mss is changed even if it is
low enough), some more tests, cli command updates. I hope I can do this quickly.
Thanks,
Miklos
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Miklos Tirpak via
os can add
that.
Cheers,
Ole
> On 28 May 2020, at 12:23, Mohsin Kazmi (sykazmi) wrote:
>
> Hi Miklos,
>
> May be, it will help https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/15144
>
> -br
> Mohsin
> From: on behalf of Ole Troan
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 11:23 AM
> To
Hi,
I see the NAT plugin already supports TCP MSS clamping but it is implemented
only in in2out direction.
We have endpoints with wrong MTUs behind tunnels and not all the traffic is
NATed. Hence, it would be very nice to have generic support for MSS clamping
that could be enabled on the tunne
of vlib_buffer_get_current(b0) we just use ip0
(that already takes save_rewrite_length into consideration). Can you please
test with this modification?
Thanks,
Klement
> On 26 May 2020, at 11:51, Miklos Tirpak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think there is a problem in ip4_sv_reass_inline(), it
p.reass.is_non_first_fragment =
550 ! !fragment_first;
...
619 vnet_buffer (b0)->ip.reass.is_non_first_fragment =
620 ! !ip4_get_fragment_offset (vlib_buffer_get_current
(b0));
Thanks,
Klement
> On 26 May 2020, at 09:25, Miklos Tirpak wrote:
>
> Hi,
&
set (vlib_buffer_get_current (b0));
Let me open a pull request to fix this.
Thanks,
Miklos
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Miklos Tirpak via
lists.fd.io
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 9:25 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] NAT44 does not work with fragmented I
Hi,
we have a scenario where an ICMP packet arrives fragmented over a GTP-U tunnel.
The outer IP packets are not fragmented, only the inner ones are. After GTP-U
decapsulation, the packets are routed via an interface where NAT44
output-feature is configured.
In the outgoing packets, the source
Hi,
the FIB table implements two reference counters:
/**
* per-source number of locks on the table
*/
u16 *ft_locks;
u32 ft_total_locks;
While trying to add lots of GTP-U tunnels, which creates a new interface
for each tunnel in a FIB table, we have reached the u16 limit ver
15 matches
Mail list logo