Whilst running VPP on multiple cores, the entire process hangs with a backtrace
a little something like this:
(gdb) backtrace -full
#0 internal_mallinfo (m=0x7fffadf18040) at
/home/vpp/vpp/src/vppinfra/dlmalloc.c:2099
q = 0x7fffadf185e0
nfree = 2
mfree = 31846400
sum = 31847744
s = 0x7fffadf183
Only cubic and newreno.
Regards,
Florin
> On Mar 21, 2022, at 9:15 PM, 25956760...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer, so is now only Cubic supported?
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#21090): https://lists.f
*
Thank you for your answer, so is now only Cubic supported?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#21089): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/21089
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/89934022/21656
Mute #vpp-hoststack:https://lis
Hi Neale,
Thank you so much. I will try to explore today and get back to you.
mean while, Is it that FIB walk is going through loop due to wrong fib objects
or may be we are not destroying the object once processed?
This issue happens only with mpls i.e inner and outer VRFs.
With Regards
Sastry
CLOSE, my misunderstanding ... default go value BdID and SwIfIndex is zero.
The default value at the VPP side is 4294967295, so the was no successful
result to reply. I have no idea how long is this behavior is used. Old
golang examples (from 2018) do not mention this behavior.
Regards Petr B.
po
Hi,
TCP BBR is on our todo list but it’s not currently supported.
Regards,
Florin
> On Mar 21, 2022, at 10:40 AM, 25956760...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dose anyone konw that if vpp-hoststack supports tcp BBR congestion
> algorithm.I need to use it, thanks
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dose anyone konw that if vpp-hoststack supports tcp BBR congestion algorithm.I
need to use it, thanks
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#21085): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/21085
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/8993402
News ... I can successfully use python3 api to call bridge_domain_dump (vpp
respond bridge domain list correctly). Any Idea where to start? (I can
successfully use govpp for other functions). Many thanks for any help you
can provide.
Regards Petr B.
s
so 19. 3. 2022 v 9:23 odesílatel Petr Boltík
Hi Sastry,
There are lots of examples of MPLS routes and VRF creation in test/test_mpls.py
and BFD session creation in test/test_bfd.py.
Or if you’d prefer there’s src/plugins/unittest/fib_test.c with fib_test_bfd.
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Sastry Sista via
lists.fd.io
Hi Neale,
Thank you so much for extending the help.
I am not sure how do I run/configure unit test. I can try If you can provide me
steps to configure VRFs using VL APIs in unit test framework.
We can have a call to discuss?
With Regards
Sastry
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all me
>
> If the FIN was received, then this should be okey I think. Both sides are
> aware that the session is closing.
>
> If the FIN and all of its re-transmits are lost, then this can become a
> problem indeed. When the other side sends data after an hour, the packets
> will be dropped and it ca
Hi Sastry,
If you can reproduce it with a unit test, I’ll look into it.
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Sastry Sista via
lists.fd.io
Date: Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 10:07
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp hangs with bfd configuration along with mpls (inner
a
12 matches
Mail list logo
