[vpp-dev] classify and redirect to tap

Hi, I am trying to send/redirect outgoing tcp port 5000 traffic to tap device. I found another thread mention “tap inject” but couldn’t find any documentation on it and “inject” is an unknown input in vpp CLI. Any advice? ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-de

[vpp-dev] Question about vhost perf tests

What specific options are we using for virtio feature-mask for vhost-user perf tests for csit for 17.01 I couldn't dig this information out of the jenkins outputs the csit docs or the test scripts. The options are documented here, https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.04/clicmd_src_vnet_devices_virtio.h

Re: [vpp-dev] Committer / Maintainer model.

In the frenzy around the 17.01 release, this seems to have died down a bit. Seems worth revitalizing the discussion somewhat, as it appears to have been productive. I tend to be something of an incrementalist, and strongly opposed to layering too much bureaucracy on things, but sometimes finding

[vpp-dev] vpp home gateway malicious traffic noted

Folks, In several days of running, I've seen unsolicited net-to-gateway [malicious] traffic - summarily discarded by the snat plugin - as follows: * Mirai botnet [tcp -> port 5747] * Microsoft WSDAPI [tcp -> port 5358] * Telnet [tcp -> port 23] * HTTP alternate [tcp -> port 81]

[vpp-dev] Could you help to address this VLIB_PLUGIN_REGISTER issue

Hey, Currently, it seems that there is a compiling failure occurred on NSH_SFC 17.04 master. I took a look at VPP code and found that there are some changes on JVPP and plugin framework in VPP recently. So I created a patch to fix this: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5030/ Fix compile issue due to j

[vpp-dev] CSIT rls1701 report published

The CSIT rls1701 report is published on FD.io site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1701/report/ Many thanks to all contributors, especially to Peter Mikus for coding report auto-generation scripts. Thanks also to Ed and Vanessa for helping out with FD.io infra challeng

Re: [vpp-dev] Publising jvpp rc jars

Hc2vpp also publishes RC debs and rpms. To build them reliably we need rc jars. We use maven for build, so most convenient for us would be to have jvpp jars in the fd.io.release repo. Marek From: Ed Warnicke (eaw) Sent: 6 lutego 2017 17:51 To: Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES a

Re: [vpp-dev] Publising jvpp rc jars

Question… why do we need RC jars and not just SNAPSHOTs? Ed On Feb 6, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) mailto:mgrad...@cisco.com>> wrote: The only impediment for 17.01 was that we forgot to mention it on time. We had a chat regarding the topic and,

Re: [vpp-dev] Publising jvpp rc jars

The only impediment for 17.01 was that we forgot to mention it on time. We had a chat regarding the topic and, as far as I remember, you mentioned such change could affect all fd.io projects (don't remember details), so we should move it to next release. In case of 17.04, jvpp jars (at least curr

Re: [vpp-dev] Publising jvpp rc jars

What was the impediment for 17.01? Ed On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) mailto:mgrad...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to publish jvpp rc jars in nexus for 17.04? https://nexus.fd.io/content/repositories/fd.io.release/io/fd/vp

[vpp-dev] Publising jvpp rc jars

Hi, Would it be possible to publish jvpp rc jars in nexus for 17.04? https://nexus.fd.io/content/repositories/fd.io.release/io/fd/vpp/ For 17.01 only rc debs and rpms were published. Publishing rc jars would allow publishing rc artifacts by hc2vpp project (and also nsh_sfc project we depend on

Re: [vpp-dev] Router advertisment api

Thanks for reply. Some comments inline. Regards, Marek -Original Message- From: otr...@employees.org [mailto:otr...@employees.org] Sent: 6 lutego 2017 14:27 To: Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Router advertisme

Re: [vpp-dev] Router advertisment api

Hi Marek, > I am looking into adding support for SLAAC configuration to Honeycomb. > It looks like it can be configured from CLI using ip6 nd command. The API also looks complete. > And here come my questions: > > 1) Is there a difference between off-link and no-onlink flags (docs say > t

Re: [vpp-dev] memory allocation fail in clib_bitmap

Dear Juan, Bitmaps are dense byte vectors. You’re asking clib_bitmap_set to create a bitmap that’s 290,984,198,272 bytes (290gb) in size. The main heap is likely 3gb, and cannot exceed 4gb unless you build an image with CLIB_VEC64 > 1. Please don’t go there. If you need a sparse structure, try

[vpp-dev] memory allocation fail in clib_bitmap

Hi, I want to use VPP clib_bitmap but when the "i" value is more than 32 bit, it fails to allocate memory. *There is my code:* uword i; clib_bitmap_set ( base_ptr->bitmap_block_map, i , 1); *and the back trace report:* The target endianness is set automatically (currently little endia

[vpp-dev] Router advertisment api

Hi, I am looking into adding support for SLAAC configuration to Honeycomb. It looks like it can be configured from CLI using ip6 nd command. And here come my questions: 1) Is there a difference between off-link and no-onlink flags (docs say they both control L-bit in the same way)? 2)