Thanks for reply. Some comments inline. Regards, Marek
-----Original Message----- From: otr...@employees.org [mailto:otr...@employees.org] Sent: 6 lutego 2017 14:27 To: Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <mgrad...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Router advertisment api Hi Marek, > I am looking into adding support for SLAAC configuration to Honeycomb. > It looks like it can be configured from CLI using ip6 nd command. The API also looks complete. Marek: read is missing, but write is almost 1-1. I was referring to CLI, because binary api is not well documented. > And here come my questions: > > 1) Is there a difference between off-link and no-onlink flags (docs say > they both control L-bit in the same way)? Having both is if nothing else confusing. Looking at the code, it appears that the intention was that "offlink" controlled whether a connected route was installed in the FIB or not. I would be quite happy if we removed the offlink parameter. And let something else ensure that there was or wasn't a suitable entry in the FIB. Marek: +1 (or at least document current behavior) > 2) What is the default flag used for? E.g. is there a difference between: > ip6 nd <interface> prefix <ip6-address>/<width> and > ip6 nd <interface> prefix <ip6-address>/<width> default >From a brief glance at the code it appears the first adds a prefix with values >set to zero, while the second sets it to the default set of recommend values >specified in the RFC. Cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
