It is hard for me to believe you are being sincere in your posts.
The only reason for the output being less is the size of the reactor vessel is
50cc rather than one liter!
There is no retraction here at all. If anything, this is a BOOST for the
technology because the actual power density has
: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 6:40:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Virtual Retraction
From:Jed Rothwell
Ø The 12 kW was with a much larger device, with a cell of ~1 L.
There is no proof of that - other than typical double-talk. The physical
devices
are approximately the same size
Note E&K report title refers to a "Experimental test of a mini-Rossi device
. . ."
Note para 2:
"The present test was done on a smaller device [5] than the 10 kW device
that has been used earlier during the January press conference. One of the
reasons for going to smaller
dimensions is safety acc
Jones Beene wrote:
> Ø The 12 kW was with a much larger device, with a cell of ~1 L.
>
>
>
> There is no proof of that - other than typical double-talk. The physical
> devices are approximately the same size when wrapped and shielded. No one
> has seen anything other than what is now seen.
>
Y
From: Jed Rothwell
* The 12 kW was with a much larger device, with a cell of ~1 L.
There is no proof of that - other than typical double-talk. The physical
devices are approximately the same size when wrapped and shielded. No one
has seen anything other than what is now seen. Many in Swed
Jones Beene wrote:
Are you serious? The Swedes published the numbers, which are in the
> citation you provided, and they indicate an average of 2.6 kW in the two
> recent tests - as opposed to 12 kW earlier.
>
The 12 kW was with a much larger device, with a cell of ~1 L. This test and
the E&K t
6 matches
Mail list logo
