It is hard for me to believe you are being sincere in your posts. The only reason for the output being less is the size of the reactor vessel is 50cc rather than one liter!
There is no retraction here at all. If anything, this is a BOOST for the technology because the actual power density has went up! The reactor is only 1/20th the size, but has only went down by 1/4th in power density! ________________________________ From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 6:12:44 PM Subject: [Vo]:The Virtual Retraction Are you serious? The Swedes published the numbers, which are in the citation you provided, and they indicate an average of 2.6 kW in the two recent tests - as opposed to 12 kW earlier. That is quite a drop from the initial claim. And it is all easily explainable by the wet steam in January, as observers have been saying for weeks. No, the Swedes didn’t rub Rossi’s nose in the discrepancy – if that is what you mean, but this is as close to a retraction as you are going to see from anyone who Rossi permits to publish. Otherwise they are out of the loop. Jones From:Jed Rothwell However, the Swedes at least are backing off the high power numbers and >these cells are probably in the range of 2500 watts if Mats' numbers are >correct. No one has backed off from any high power numbers as far as I know. There have been no retractions.
