RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-03 Thread Dewar Charles R
It does with my O2K. -Original Message- From: Steve Bostedor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion WEird. It doesn't show to using Outlook 2000. -Original Message- From: [

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-03 Thread Steve Bostedor
Of Lyle Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:03 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion They showed up here using Outlook 2000 against an Exchange 5.5 SP3 mail server. Looking at the full headers of the message Steve sent(I sent a copy to Steve only), his

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Lyle
;From:' when he gets the messages from this list. Lyle -Original Message- From: Steve Bostedor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion WEird. It doesn't show to using Outlook 2000.

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Steve Bostedor
WEird. It doesn't show to using Outlook 2000. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Biber Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Yes it does. On your message

Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Simon Biber
Yes it does. On your message below, the from is From: "Steve Bostedor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Simon. - Original Message - From: "Steve Bostedor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 1:30 AM Subject: RE: Noise on

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Message text: Possibly we could elect one or two non-VNC-core-developer list regulars as the "official silly-question answerers and FAQ-pointer-outers" on a rotating basis; then Wez et al could just ignore that stuff. Th

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
ity. That would serve the discussion of the problem and the search for a solution immensely. Date: 02.01.2001 11:49 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Message text: Excerpts from vnc: 22-Dec-100 Re: N

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Dewar Charles R
Reply, then cut-and-paste the address from the header. -Original Message- From: Steve Bostedor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Because this list does not include the senders email

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Steve Bostedor
Because this list does not include the senders email address in the from field. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carlyle Sutphen Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Erdely, Michael
"Carlyle Sutphen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2001 9:16 AM Subject: Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion > I think you misunderstood. The private mail is meant to keep the investigation > out of the list. Whenever any new knowl

Re: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
he question has been sufficiently clairified, this could be announced to the list. Date: 22.12.2000 22:16 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Message text: I couldn't disagree more. I, among m

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
showing an interest in solving the problem. Date: 22.12.2000 18:26 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Message text: Just a suggestion - answering only the person who raised the question keeps others

Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
enerally reply to an old mail and change the subject to suit my message. Date: 22.12.2000 18:02 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Message text: Jean-Marie Theis wrote: > > Maybe I have

Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Jenny Ladd
Excerpts from vnc: 22-Dec-100 Re: Noise on the vnc-list :.. by Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Just a suggestion - answering only the person who raised the question keeps > others who may well have the same problem now or in the near future from > seeing the answer. That ends up making more work for th

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-27 Thread Morris, Steve
nesday, December 27, 2000 10:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion > > > Again, we disagree based on the arrogance of that position. > I think that, to > follow your own advice, you should reply to me personally at > [EM

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-27 Thread Steve Bostedor
ris, Steve Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 9:56 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Steve Bostedor [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] makes the silly arguement: > You're asking the other guy to sift through technical > manuals and FAQs for his ans

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-27 Thread Steve Bostedor
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morris, Steve Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 9:56 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion Steve Bostedor [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] makes the silly arguement:

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-27 Thread John Clegg
a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 4:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion > > > Jean-Marie Theis wrote: > > > > Maybe I have a small simple suggestion concerning the way we handle > > techni

RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-26 Thread Morris, Steve
Steve Bostedor [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] makes the silly arguement: > You're asking the other guy to sift through technical > manuals and FAQs for his answer, it doesn't seem consistent > that you are not willing to do the same. There is an asymmetry here. Asking people to look for obvious answers

Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-22 Thread a . umpleby
> create different lists concerning differents aspects of VNC. Yes, I've been aware recently that there is a lot of 'discussion' going through the list which might be better off split into different 'segments' somehow. One first p

Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-22 Thread Lee Douglas
Just a suggestion - answering only the person who raised the question keeps others who may well have the same problem now or in the near future from seeing the answer. That ends up making more work for the more knowledgeable and helpful members of the list. I hope you won't choose the private

Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-22 Thread Joseph A. Knapka
Jean-Marie Theis wrote: > > Maybe I have a small simple suggestion concerning the way we handle > technical questions : > Once a question is launched , the rule could be to respond privately > to the person who has a problem until he has solved it. This is a good idea, but it is very inconve

Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2000-12-22 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
If there is agreement on this, there would have to be an ettiquette file next to the FAQ file file to inform newcomers of the local customs (I deliberately avoided the words laws and rules!). The suse linux mailing lists do this, at here in Germany and I was only actuall in the isdn list. P.S.