>What i have learned from this is not to apply a new service pack the moment
>it is being released but to wait (or to install the service pack using the
>backup option) , especially since service pack 5 was causing no problems
>whatsoeve.
Oh yes. Definitely. Microsoft service packs definitely f
problems
whatsoeve.
rog
-Original Message-
From: Mac Reiter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03/04/01 16:06
Subject: RE: Memory prb with NT4
At 12:42 PM 4/3/01 +0100, you wrote:
>I would never recommend to anyone to install service pack 6a, service
pack 5
>is the one I would rec
> The last comment would make a lot of sense. The very existence of an 'a'
> version of SP6 means that they realized that they had hosed something
> immensely badly (in plain SP6) and had to fix it immediately (in SP6a).
> Which would suggest that SP6a is probably pretty clean (since there is no
At 12:42 PM 4/3/01 +0100, you wrote:
>I would never recommend to anyone to install service pack 6a, service pack 5
>is the one I would recommend
>
>cheers
>rog
I am aware of the glaring fubars present in SP4, and that SP5 fixed at
least some of those. What was so bad about SP6a? It worked fine
At 03:18 PM 4/3/01 +0200, you wrote:
>> I did it as well, and I have no problems at all...
>
>I use NT4SP6a on quite a few systems, including our backup server (running
>Legato NetWorker). It works fine. I installed SP6a because of a vendor
>recommendation, but I can't remember which one.
>
>I b
There was some bad reports on SP6 when it first came out...
caused alot of blue screens...but the SP6a patch fixed
those problems. Have not heard of many problems since then.
Ralph Wagner
BSS
Rodney Wines wrote:
>
> > I did it as well, and I have no problems at all...
>
> I use NT4SP6a on quit
> I did it as well, and I have no problems at all...
I use NT4SP6a on quite a few systems, including our backup server (running
Legato NetWorker). It works fine. I installed SP6a because of a vendor
recommendation, but I can't remember which one.
I believe that SP6 is bad news ...
lijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Richard Spaven
Verzonden: dinsdag 3 april 2001 14:34
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: Memory prb with NT4
I did it and I shafted the user data
I did it and I shafted the user database.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dries Feys
Sent: 03 April 2001 13:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Memory prb with NT4
And why not, if I may know ?
Dries Feys -- Software Engineer
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Rogier Boeken
Verzonden: dinsdag 3 april 2001 13:43
Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Onderwerp: RE: Memory prb with NT4
I would never recommend to anyone to install service pack 6a, service pack 5
is the one I would recomme
I would never recommend to anyone to install service pack 6a, service pack 5
is the one I would recommend
cheers
rog
-Original Message-
From: Dries Feys
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03/04/01 09:54
Subject: RE: Memory prb with NT4
The only thing I can see now, is to "upgrade"
The only thing I can see now, is to "upgrade" to SP 6a, but I'm not sure it
we resolve anything. There is somewhere a memory leak caused by VNC or the
combination of VNC and SP 4...
Regards,
Dries Feys -- Software Engineer
TVH forklift parts -- Thermote & Vanhalst NV
Driemasten 120-126 -- B-
>From: "Dries Feys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Memory prb with NT4
>Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:53:24 +0200
>
>Which version of VNC are you using ?
The last one : 333R9 (the problem existed
Which version of VNC are you using ?
I know this isn't a solution, but can't you just kill the VNC service by the
task manager and then restart the service ?
Regards,
Dries Feys -- Software Engineer
TVH forklift parts -- Thermote & Vanhalst NV
Driemasten 120-126 -- B-8560 Gullegem-Belgium
E-
14 matches
Mail list logo
