: Netmeeting does allow the audio and video [...]
: VNC [is] great for the desktop but then there is no audio/video. Of
: course, you have to then consider the bandwidth issues currently with
: audio/video/remote desktop all going at once. You almost need a 10,
: really 100Mbit LAN to do it all
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 13:13, Dylan McNeill wrote:
> Secure? I believe so.
Just keep telling yourself that...
Ha.
Heh. Heheh.
BWAHAHAHAHAH!
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in
PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Help me settle a friendlly argument
Great points!
Do you find it just a coincidence that the only NAT'ing firewall that
can
easily support Netmeeting is (tada!): Micro$oft Internet Security and
Acceleration (ISA) server?
It's an option in
From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help me settle a friendlly argument
Heyaz. Sorry to chime in so late to this, but I though
I might add some detail. I&#x
the target machine. Many of the best (imo) developed apps are
done in exactly this manner. Makes my life supporting a firewall
script that much easier. :)
Hope this helps!
cheers,
Scott
> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:32:51 -0500
> From: David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Help me settle a friendlly argument
One for sound, one for video, one for chat/whiteboard, and one for Desktop
Share.
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Help me settle a friendlly argument
>> Are you aware that NetMeeting is using the RDP protocol?, The same protocol
&
a machine instead of one like vnc.
that is what makes it so laggy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: b 11 cvnax 2001 00:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Help me settle a friendlly argument
>
>
> 1) Size. VN
that VNC uses the bandwidth better then NetMeeting, other then
that all the other stuff you mentioned are current.
-Original Message-
From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: b 11 cvnax 2001 00:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help me settle a friendlly argument
1) Size. VNC
8) Cross platform between three major OSs; might be especially
important to anyone in a school environment with macintosh and wintel
boxes. Client for macs is equally small in footprint and resources.
9) Did you mention FREE for all platforms?
tlatshaw
also a technology coordinator
ScanMan
wers to user questions.
Glenn
-Original Message-
From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help me settle a friendlly argument
1) Size. VNC fits on a floppy; NetMeeting is huge.
2) Speed. NetMeeting takes forever to
1) Size. VNC fits on a floppy; NetMeeting is huge.
2) Speed. NetMeeting takes forever to load.
3) RAM footprint. VNC is small enough to be run continuously. NetMeeting
takes large amounts of RAM.
4) Network Bandwidth. NetMeeting is sluggish even on low-latency
connections. Running several NetMeeti
Folks,
Help me enumerate the ways that VNC (and its various flavors such as
tightvnc, tridiavnc, etc.) is better for remote desktop admin (mostly
troubleshooting, some admin stuff) on a LAN (WindowsNT4 Servers and
Workstations, Win2K) running 100Mb (10 mb in a couple places) than
Microsoft's NetMe
13 matches
Mail list logo
