run into any problems tranfering binary files and ascii
files so I just leave it the default.
Have fun :-)
Rachel
- Original Message -
From: "Fredrik Malmquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: File Transfer with WinVNC?
Hello,
I too, have an occassional need to send files from my remote to the server.
I do this by simply setting up a share on the "serving computer". Then, I
use Explorer on my remote (in this case an FeX21 Handheld CE device) to
establish a link to the share. Once connected, then I can drag and
There was a program designed by a German bank which offered file transfer
via VNC.
The link is dead now; anyone have a copy of know more about this?
--Brian Schkerke
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line
> -Original Message-
> From: insitus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> CBee,
>
> I heard what you are saying here.
> What exactly is the use of WinVNC?
>
> I have been using pcAnywhere for file transfer. When DSL system was
> insalled, DSL software appears
- Original Message -
From: "Beerse, Corni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2002-05-21 03:01
Subject: RE: File Transfer with WinVNC?
(SNIP)
> I hate those piggyback things. A tool has to do what it is good at and
> nothing more.
(
CBee,
I heard what you are saying here.
What exactly is the use of WinVNC?
I have been using pcAnywhere for file transfer. When DSL system was
insalled, DSL software appears to block pcAnywhere. Then, somebody advised
me to try WinVNC. I now learned that WinVNC is NOT designed for file
> -Original Message-
> From: Fredrik Malmquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > Another option is to set up a company FTP server - then you
> have a central
> > log of all traffic back and forth. It does require setting
> up an FTP
> client
> > you're comfortable with on the VNC client
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex K. Angelopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> The one thing worth noting about this is that file transfer
> capability _is_ a
> usage feature which goes hand in glove with remote session
> control; that's why
> it is alwa
> -Original Message-
> From: insitus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> If WinVNC does not do file transfer, I am wondering what is
> good about WinVNC.
One of the best things about vnc (all variants) is that it does what it is
designed to do. Nothing more and nothing
which uses the clipboard which is already supported, as its file
transfer protocol.
I guess this may be a way to go if the need is there.
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in t
"
AT&T WIRELESS
CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY
Use pursuant to Company instructions
-Original Message-
From: Peter Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: File Transfer with WinVNC?
I got a sort of answer to this
those are all issues which can be overcome, *given sufficient time*
to work with them; but that's what most consultants don't have.
What it comes down to is that in cases where I find myself needing regular
access to customer's systems for file transfer, I usually wind up switching ove
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Fredrik Malmquist wrote:
> FTP really sucks with firewalls, it uses random ports in the high port-range
> that needs to be mapped and discovered, and those ports are random and
> varies with the server you are running, and most of the time it doesn't
> really say what numbers
--- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2002-05-20 10:51
Subject: Re: File Transfer with WinVNC?
> Just a thought. For windows platforms: NetMeeting has a good file
> transfer tool. With VNC already running, you can turn it
> While trying to figure out how to work with WinVNC, I tried a program
called
> "Remote Administrator".
> It was great. Remote controlling was faster than pcAnywhere. File
> transfer was much faster than that done by pcAnywhere.
> The only problem I see with Remote
> Another option is to set up a company FTP server - then you have a central
> log of all traffic back and forth. It does require setting up an FTP
client
> you're comfortable with on the VNC client. Also, make sure not to allow
> anonymous uploads or you'll be sure to be abused. Also, firewall
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: File Transfer with WinVNC?
>
>
> Just a thought. For windows platforms: NetMeeting has a good file
> transfer tool. With VNC already running, you can turn it on
> and off at
> both ends yourself. I haven't had need to try it yet.
Just a thought. For windows platforms: NetMeeting has a good file
transfer tool. With VNC already running, you can turn it on and off at
both ends yourself. I haven't had need to try it yet. I work within my
own network and have shared drives for that stuff. Good luck.
Have a Goo
While trying to figure out how to work with WinVNC, I tried a program called
"Remote Administrator".
It was great. Remote controlling was faster than pcAnywhere. File
transfer was much faster than that done by pcAnywhere.
The only problem I see with Remote Administrator is that i
The one thing worth noting about this is that file transfer capability _is_ a
usage feature which goes hand in glove with remote session control; that's why
it is always eventually integrated into such tools. There are definite
advantages to having this kind of functionality piggybacked o
existing
tools.
bye.
boyd.
- Original Message -
From: "insitus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: File Transfer with WinVNC?
> If WinVNC does not do file transfer, I am wondering what is good
Low-overhead remote control, without all the extra wasteful code present
in apps like PC Anywhere, SMS et al.
In message <001501c1$93c8fa90$403442cf@home5pek3wiuzp>, insitus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>If WinVNC does not do file transfer, I am wondering what is goo
My core router can't make espresso. I think I'll throw it away.
-Original Message-
From: insitus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File Transfer with WinVNC?
If WinVNC does not do file transfer, I am wonderi
If WinVNC does not do file transfer, I am wondering what is good about
WinVNC.
Regards,
In Kim
- Original Message -
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:54 AM
Subject: RE: File Transfer with WinVNC?
Why bother adding extra layers? File transfer already exists
in most any platform you could be using..
NT, administrative shares via SMB
Unix, NFS
**
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 16:11:23 -0600
From: "insitus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: File Transfer with WinVNC?
Hi,
Now,
> Hi,
> Now, I am able to do remote control.
> But I could not figure out how to do file transfer between host and remote
> control.
> I looked around WinVNC menu. I do not see anything to do with File
> Transfer.
> Your assistance would be appreciated. Regards,
Hi,
Now, I am able to do remote control.
But I could not figure out how to do file transfer between host and remote
control.
I looked around WinVNC menu. I do not see anything to do with File
Transfer.
Your assistance would be appreciated. Regards, In Kim
I have a friend who uset to use Doze, and transferring files was always
a BIG pain.
On 07 Dec 2001 11:42:11 -0500, Jorge A. Giraldo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Perhaps this has been asked a lot, sorry to pollute. What is the
> preferred method to transfer files between Windows platforms, using
> TCP/IP
One packet at a time ;)
-Original Message-
From: Jorge A. Giraldo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: File transfer
Hello,
Perhaps this has been asked a lot, sorry to pollute. What is the
preferred method to transfer
Hello,
Perhaps this has been asked a lot, sorry to pollute. What is the
preferred method to transfer files between Windows platforms, using
TCP/IP?.
Thank you in advance.
Jorge A.
-
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Dear James Pifer,
dear VNC gurus and users,
admittedly, I'm very happy VNC does _not_ have file transfer
capabilites. For file transfers, other tools (such as scp, included
in the OpenSSH package) are available (thanks to RedHat, even on the
platform that comes from Redmond). As for VNC
as possible out of the Clipboard. With my
proposal, you'd "just" define a new RFB message type and provide the code,
which would probably be simpler and faster than the clipboard-handling code
due to avoiding the necessity of UU
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Dries Feys wrote:
> That was my idea too... I think this it pretty easy to implement. A file
> picker (open file dialog) on the server side to choose a file, which is
> uuencoded, and then after the clipboard transfer (or a similar system) a
> save file dialog on the client
uuencoding and
cutting and pasting (even with some crude programmatical
automation)...
- Original Message -
From: "Morris, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:53 PM
Subject: Proposed solution to file transfer problem.
>
I want to rewind a little.
In the his post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] made a proposal that could the
the good enough solution many of us could live with. He made several
suggestions but the one I liked best requires a utility on the server side
and a utility on the client side. One utility reads
>forward. There are times when I want a whole directory but mostly I just
For those times, you'd probably be better off to zip the directory anyway,
which would then result in a single-file transfer.
Dave
-
To unsubscri
At 12:02 PM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
>A simple, one file at a time, binary file transfer would be a big leap
>forward. There are times when I want a whole directory but mostly I just
>want to edit locally that single word file or C file and then send it back.
>The main reason I wan
yes, but for that it's so simple to just email the word doc
back and forth...
- Original Message -
From: "Morris, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: File Transfer
> A simple, one file a
> In fact, I've transfered *binary* files this way (to/from Unix systems,
mind,
> no
> Winders anywhere in sight). I'm not sure what restrictions Winders puts on
> the clipboard, if any, but there is very little restriction put on it in
X.
This is unsafe in general, since between Unxi and Windows
to Dries Feys:
> I rather like the clipboard method of file transfer. Writing a simple pair
> of "send" and "receive" programs to put files onto the clipboard in a
> standard format and pick them back off would be useful in other situations,
> wouldn't be overly
I would go for that, too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dries Feys
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: File Transfer
I rather like the clipboard method of file transfer. Writing a simple pair
A simple, one file at a time, binary file transfer would be a big leap
forward. There are times when I want a whole directory but mostly I just
want to edit locally that single word file or C file and then send it back.
The main reason I want to do that is because the cursor lag behind mouse
meant for large folders of small to large
sized files. cutting and pasting via the clipboard wouldn't
be practicalthanks tho...
- Original Message -
From: "James ''Wez'' Weatherall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed
I rather like the clipboard method of file transfer. Writing a simple pair
of "send" and "receive" programs to put files onto the clipboard in a
standard format and pick them back off would be useful in other situations,
wouldn't be overly complicated (UUencode could alm
For what it's worth:
I rather like the clipboard method of file transfer. Writing a simple pair
of "send" and "receive" programs to put files onto the clipboard in a
standard format and pick them back off would be useful in other situations,
wouldn't be overly comp
Dave:
Heya. PDF turned out larger than I thought it would,
so I'll post it rather than spam your inbox:
ftp://ftp.echogent.com/docs/FTP_and_Firewalls.pdf
Any feedback of course appreciated. I'm thinking
this is version 0.9, and I'll knock it into 1.0 shape and
get it onto Sourcef
> This is why I want a /1/ port file transfer program. FTP is not a 1 port
> file transfer program. I'm looking for something that does control /and/
> data over the same connection.
Would HTTP work?
I don't know of any other solutions, but to be blunt
> There's one or two other steps. They're a bit tricky, but
> it's a solvable problem. I've got a PDF which describes the whole
> process, but due to graphics it's a bit chunky. I'll post it to my
> website later this week; feel free to email me off-list and I'll
> send you a copy.
Would you mind
Jordan Share wrote:
>
> Ahh, I think there is a misconception on what passive FTP actually does.
> Here is a link to (some class's notes) on ftp. Check out section 2.1
> (Passive Versus Active Mode FTP)
> http://bigworm.colorado.edu/Saclass/class14.html
>
[Beating self about head & shoulders w
t is mapped to that from the outside." If you always have
to use snoopy:9 to get to it, then you will remember to use nat-box:9 to get
to it from the outside.
Jordan
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph A. Knapka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
e port). This also
applies to FTP servers behind firewalls that only permit outgoing
connections by default.
This is why I want a /1/ port file transfer program. FTP is not a 1 port
file transfer program. I'm looking for something that does control /and/
data over the same connection.
Tha
Jordan:
Hello! Can't...help...myself...must...answer...;)
> As far as using FTP in passive mode, can you tell me how to get this to
> work when both machines are behind a "one-to-many" NAT? I was pretty
> sure the FTP protocol required 2 connections, one for control and one
> for data.
Jordan Share wrote:
>
> Well, how do use HTTP to copy files to the machine I am controlling? I have
> had people tell me that this is possible, but I guess I've never really
> investigated. If it involves writing ASP (or whatever) and submitting files
> via the browser, this is not so much what
>Well, how do use HTTP to copy files to the machine I am controlling? I
>have had people tell me that this is possible, but I guess I've never really
>investigated. If it involves writing ASP (or whatever) and submitting files
>via the browser, this is not so much what I am looking for.
No matt
om: "Adam Tauno Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Single Port File transfer
> >SSH (scp) is probably the best solution. However, you can use
> >FTP in PASSIVE mode, in which case it only will use
>SSH (scp) is probably the best solution. However, you can use
>FTP in PASSIVE mode, in which case it only will use one port.
>I'm not sure if all clients support passive mode, though
>(all servers should).
WHy not use http? Even Win9x these days comes with "personal web server"
Systems and Net
SSH (scp) is probably the best solution. However, you can use
FTP in PASSIVE mode, in which case it only will use one port.
I'm not sure if all clients support passive mode, though
(all servers should).
-- Joe
Jordan Share wrote:
>
> One thing that has come up for me, in my use of VNC to remote
One thing that has come up for me, in my use of VNC to remotely control my
home and work PCs (running Win2kPro) is a need to transfer files between
them.
I have not yet found a program that will use one port (which can be easily
forwarded from/permitted through a firewall) to transfer files.
I a
58 matches
Mail list logo
