The are chalk and cheese to each other. Completely different kettles of fish
:-)
-Original Message-
From: bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2006 15:46
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: VNC .vs Msoft Terminal Server
hi...
are there comparisons between VNC and MSoft's Terminal
Beauford, Jason wrote:
> My opinion is, if you can use TS, use TS. No need to use a third party
> software to provide the exact same functionality. Although some will
> say with VNC you can perform file transfers, which isn't a bad thing
> either.
AFAIK, be aware that file transfers is not a fe
Hi .. I searched the docs, faqs and the support messages but could not find
how to transfer files using P4.2.5 (both server and client).
Thanks in advance,
Les
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http:/
Not in the "REAL" version, but it is available in the "ULTRA" version.
Also, another benefit of VNC is CONSOLE access. When you log on via TS,
you get your own new session and you cannot control the CONSOLE session.
With VNC, you are logging on the console session, which may be required
for some
Hi,
I have a problem that I can't find the solution to, I have the same problem
as discussed in the thread below but I use XP instead of 2000. I have
downloaded the latest version and tried both the enterprise edition and the
free edition and the problem persists. Every time a connect to the se
I use a combination of both. I generally use RDP to connect to a single
computer over the Internet and then use VNC Scan to manage all of the
computers on that network using VNC from that desktop.
This way, I only need to publish one TCP port 3389 to the remote
network. RDP is generally faster
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 08:46, Beauford, Jason wrote:
> Not in the "REAL" version, but it is available in the "ULTRA"
> version.
>
> Also, another benefit of VNC is CONSOLE access. When you log on via
> TS, you get your own new session and you cannot control the CONSOLE
> session. With VNC, you
> -Original Message-
> Also, another benefit of VNC is CONSOLE access. When you log
> on via TS,
> you get your own new session and you cannot control the
> CONSOLE session.
> With VNC, you are logging on the console session, which may
> be required
> for some installations and Administ
Yury Averkiev wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> Also, another benefit of VNC is CONSOLE access. When you log on via
>> TS, you get your own new session and you cannot control the CONSOLE
>> session. With VNC, you are logging on the console session, which may
>> be required for some installat
Les,
Please submit support requests via http://www.realvnc.com/support.html.
File transfer between Windows systems is achieved using the "clipboard"
Copy/Paste mechanism.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Hi,
I've installed free vnc-4_1_2-x86_win32 on 3 servers and configured the
connections & authentication which works properly.
What I found was when connecting to a server where the machine is logged
off or locked the input of ctrl+alt+del wasn't carried across to the
remote machine to actually
Mirza,
The problem you describe is specific to VNC Enterprise & Personal Editions,
and does not affect VNC Free Edition. You will only see this problem with
XP systems on which the Terminal Services service has been disabled - in
this situation an operating system API used by VNC Server leaks mem
Hit the "F8" key and select "send CTL+ALT+DEL"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:54 AM
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: VNC free & W2K server
>
> Hi,
>
> I've installed f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've installed free vnc-4_1_2-x86_win32 on 3 servers and configured the
> connections & authentication which works properly. What I found was when
> connecting to a server where the machine is logged off or locked the input
> of ctrl+alt+del wasn't carried acros
14 matches
Mail list logo
