Re: [Uta] ALPN recommendations in draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-01

2021-07-31 Thread Martin Thomson
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, at 00:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Yes. This text could be phrased more clearly: implementations of TLS > itself must support the ALPN extension, but application protocols can > choose to support ALPN or not. I know that this what you are trying to say, so I am not disag

Re: [Uta] ALPN recommendations in draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-01

2021-07-31 Thread Martin Thomson
There is no binding to an IP or port. The only relevant binding here is to a TLS connection. On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, at 04:16, Yaron Sheffer wrote: > Yes, of course it would. > > Thanks, > Yaron > > On 7/28/21, 20:24, "Uta on behalf of Grant Taylor" > gtaylor=40tnetconsulting@dmarc.

Re: [Uta] ALPN recommendations in draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-01

2021-07-31 Thread John Levine
It appears that Martin Thomson said: >There is a piece missing. Yaron mentioned Alpaca. For that what we need to say >is what Alexey might fear: application protocols >MUST define ALPN labels and use them. Well, you know, ALPACA is the predictable result of three decades of web browsers accept