Re: [Uta] ALPN recommendations in draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-01

[Martin Thomson]

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, at 00:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Yes. This text could be phrased more clearly: implementations of TLS
> itself must support the ALPN extension, but application protocols can
> choose to support ALPN or not.

I know that this what you are trying to say, so I am not disagreeing, but...

There is a piece missing. Yaron mentioned Alpaca. For that what we need to say 
is what Alexey might fear: application protocols MUST define ALPN labels and 
use them.

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta