IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD
Followup
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp/
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
Sounds like a plan. I'm off to push the approval button. Thanks all.
pr
On 2/20/15 4:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
On 2/20/15 3:34 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
present less confusion for someone reviewing both documents in the
future.
Once you start to try to learn about ec, confusio
On 2/20/15 3:34 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
present less confusion for someone reviewing both documents in the
future.
Once you start to try to learn about ec, confusion avoidance really
isn't a tenable position anymore.
If we absolutely need to clarify this small bit of terminology, we can
> present less confusion for someone reviewing both documents in the
> future.
Once you start to try to learn about ec, confusion avoidance really
isn't a tenable position anymore.
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf
On Fri 2015-02-20 16:08:17 -0500, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
> Since we seem to all be on the same page, I'm going to submit -11 with
> this text and Viktor's little modp fix so that we can all move on with
> our lives...
If we could use the term "finite field" instead of modp, that would
a
As the document shepherd of this draft, I am happy to declare that all issues
have been resolved and ask the responsible chair, Peter Resnick, to approve the
document.
Thanks to all for the great work on this important document!!!
Orit.
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.o
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Recommendations for Secure Use of TLS and DTLS
Authors : Yaron Sheffer
On 02/20/2015 11:08 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Thanks! I cleared.
>
The sound you are hearing in the background is the sound of the the two
chairs exhaling.
Thx everyone for very good work!
Cheers Leif
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
http
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Recommendations for Secure Use of TLS and DTLS
Authors : Yaron Sheffer
A new version (-11) has been submitted for draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-11.txt
The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp/
Diff from previous version:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc
A new version (-10) has been submitted for draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-10.txt
Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf
Thanks! I cleared.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
wrote:
> On 2/20/15 1:57 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>> SGTM, except your use of "#" confused my mental Markdown parser :)
>>
>
> Sorry about the parser issues!
>
> Since we seem to all be on the same page, I'm going t
Richard's, Pete's or Peter's takes on this are all fine. Let's ship it!
S.
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
On 2/20/15 1:57 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
SGTM, except your use of "#" confused my mental Markdown parser :)
Sorry about the parser issues!
Since we seem to all be on the same page, I'm going to submit -11 with
this text and Viktor's little modp fix so that we can all move on with
our lives.
SGTM, except your use of "#" confused my mental Markdown parser :)
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
wrote:
> On 2/20/15 1:22 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/15 1:43 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Stephen Farrell
>>> mailto:step
On 2/20/15 1:52 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 06:50:17AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[ Top post: So should the title and text of 4.4 be changed? ]
Well, modp is, I assume, short for Modular Exponentiation so the RFC
Editor is going to ask us to spell it out on first use
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 06:50:17AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[ Top post: So should the title and text of 4.4 be changed? ]
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:19:32PM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
>
> > >Section 4.4. "Modular vs. Elliptic Curve"
> > >
> > >I think that "finite field" or "m
On 2/20/15 1:22 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 2/20/15 1:43 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Stephen Farrell
mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote:
The sense of the UTA Working Group was to complete
work on this document about best practices for TLS i
Yes, the passive voice *is* good for avoiding responsibility!
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Pete Resnick
wrote:
> On 2/20/15 1:43 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Stephen Farrell <
> stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>>
>> The sense of the UTA Working Gr
On 2/20/15 1:43 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Stephen Farrell
mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote:
The sense of the UTA Working Group was to complete
work on this document about best practices for TLS in
general, and to
initiate
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-10: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to http://www.ie
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
> FWIW, I could live with the current text or with Richard's (modulo
> one thing below). Or with stuff in-between.
>
> On 20/02/15 16:23, Richard Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <
> pe...@andyet.
FWIW, I could live with the current text or with Richard's (modulo
one thing below). Or with stuff in-between.
On 20/02/15 16:23, Richard Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/15 3:45 AM, Ralph Holz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Viktor,
>>>
>>> B
Those fixes are fine with me.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
> Modulo a few nits (inline), this seems acceptable to me.
>
> On 2/20/15 9:23 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
>> mailto:pe...@andyet.net
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-10: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to http://www.ietf
Modulo a few nits (inline), this seems acceptable to me.
On 2/20/15 9:23 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
mailto:pe...@andyet.net>> wrote:
On 2/20/15 3:45 AM, Ralph Holz wrote:
Hi Viktor,
Basically, I'm fine with "r
This LGTM.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <
> pe...@andyet.net> wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/15 3:45 AM, Ralph Holz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Viktor,
>>>
>>> Basically, I'm fine with "raising the ceiling" as high as it se
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
wrote:
> On 2/20/15 3:45 AM, Ralph Holz wrote:
>
>> Hi Viktor,
>>
>> Basically, I'm fine with "raising the ceiling" as high as it seems
>> to make sense, but once the floor is raised too high, the BCP no
>> longer applies to op
On 2/20/15 3:45 AM, Ralph Holz wrote:
Hi Viktor,
Basically, I'm fine with "raising the ceiling" as high as it seems
to make sense, but once the floor is raised too high, the BCP no
longer applies to opportunistic TLS.
Thanks for jumping in and providing a good summary.
In my opini
Hi Viktor,
Basically, I'm fine with "raising the ceiling" as high as it seems
> to make sense, but once the floor is raised too high, the BCP no
> longer applies to opportunistic TLS.
>
>
Thanks for jumping in and providing a good summary.
In my opinion, the purposes of this BCP *and* of OS are b
30 matches
Mail list logo
