Hi Viktor,

Basically, I'm fine with "raising the ceiling" as high as it seems
> to make sense, but once the floor is raised too high, the BCP no
> longer applies to opportunistic TLS.
>
>
Thanks for jumping in and providing a good summary.

In my opinion, the purposes of this BCP *and* of OS are best served if we
leave the BCP wording as it is - we address the authenticated use case
only. There are more than enough deployments that are covered by the BCP's
recommendations. For OS, I would be happy to see a different document to
focus on that use case, and do it well - as indeed the WG consensus was,
too.

Ralph
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to