Hi Viktor, Basically, I'm fine with "raising the ceiling" as high as it seems > to make sense, but once the floor is raised too high, the BCP no > longer applies to opportunistic TLS. > > Thanks for jumping in and providing a good summary.
In my opinion, the purposes of this BCP *and* of OS are best served if we leave the BCP wording as it is - we address the authenticated use case only. There are more than enough deployments that are covered by the BCP's recommendations. For OS, I would be happy to see a different document to focus on that use case, and do it well - as indeed the WG consensus was, too. Ralph
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta