On 2/20/15 3:45 AM, Ralph Holz wrote:
Hi Viktor,Basically, I'm fine with "raising the ceiling" as high as it seems to make sense, but once the floor is raised too high, the BCP no longer applies to opportunistic TLS. Thanks for jumping in and providing a good summary. In my opinion, the purposes of this BCP *and* of OS are best served if we leave the BCP wording as it is - we address the authenticated use case only. There are more than enough deployments that are covered by the BCP's recommendations. For OS, I would be happy to see a different document to focus on that use case, and do it well - as indeed the WG consensus was, too.
+1 I'm going to submit version -10 now. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/ _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
