Re: [USRP-users] Libuhd issues - "uhd_find_devices: error while loading shared libraries"

2019-12-10 Thread Cedric Roux via USRP-users
Dear Saeid, a bit OT, but, On 2019-12-10 00:06, Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users wrote: And now UHD tools work, also within the LTE software, but they won't find my B210 saying: [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 4.8.4; Boost_105400; UHD_3.14.1.1-release Error: LookupError: KeyError: No device

[USRP-users] N320: XQ image issue using sfp0 as time_source

2019-12-10 Thread Truan David via USRP-users
Hi! We are using multiples N320 (UHD 3.14) and we want to synchronize our setup using the White Rabbit protocol and using the N320 as the WR Slave and the Master being an OPNT Switch. We have to be able to stream the IQ over the QSFP+ port (seen as sfp0) and use the SFP0 as the WR input so we

Re: [USRP-users] Default RFNoC image for N310 does not compile

2019-12-10 Thread Robert via USRP-users
Hi Nate! I followed the guide in https://files.ettus.com/manual/md_usrp3_build_instructions.html, thus ended up with Vivado 2018.3 and then later found out this requires UHD 3.15. Thanks for pointing me to the Vivado bug. I thought with 2018.3.1 this would be fixed, but apparently that is not

Re: [USRP-users] Default RFNoC image for N310 does not compile

2019-12-10 Thread Nate Temple via USRP-users
Hi Robert, This patch/line change detailed below should resolve that issue and will be included in the official 3.15.0.0 release: --- usrp3/lib/rfnoc/noc_shell.v | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/usrp3/lib/rfnoc/noc_shell.v b/usrp3/lib/rfnoc/noc_shell.v index 92

Re: [USRP-users] Phase relation between RX/TX LO

2019-12-10 Thread Lukas Haase via USRP-users
Hi Marcus, > Von: "Marcus D. Leech" > [...] > You're using the MANUAL policy for BOTH DSP and RF. Let the automatic > "stuff" do its thing, with the only difference being integer-N tuning. Pretty incredible, I think I found the(?) issue. https://kb.ettus.com/UBX#Phase_Synchronization: "If you a

[USRP-users] Configure build for RFNoC block with custom IP

2019-12-10 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Hi, I created my own FFT IP core and corresponding xci file using Vivado and created a new RFNoC block to use it, noc_block_myfft. I was able to manually modify the makefile in the rfnoc/testbenches/noc_block_myfft_tb/ folder to add a new makefile which I created next to the xci file. I did this

Re: [USRP-users] Configure build for RFNoC block with custom IP

2019-12-10 Thread EJ Kreinar via USRP-users
Hi Rob, I do this pretty often, and the uhd-fpga repo does let you use the Makefile.OOT.inc files to add OOT repos to device builds. If you follow the Makefile examples in github.com/ejk43/rfnoc-ootexample, then use the uhd_image_builder.py script to add the OOT repo, it should recognize the Make

Re: [USRP-users] Phase relation between RX/TX LO

2019-12-10 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 12/10/2019 05:12 PM, Lukas Haase wrote: Hi Marcus, Von: "Marcus D. Leech" [...] You're using the MANUAL policy for BOTH DSP and RF. Let the automatic "stuff" do its thing, with the only difference being integer-N tuning. Pretty incredible, I think I found the(?) issue. https://kb.ettus.com