Hi Johannes:
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 11:05 +, Johannes Demel wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> thanks for your answer and help. That's the pointer I was looking
> for.
>
> Just for clarification, I' refering to this schematic:
> https://files.ettus.com/schematics/ubx/ubx.pdf
>
> The 'SKyWorks SKY13350-38
On 02/26/2019 08:41 AM, Andy Walls via USRP-users wrote:
In my opinion, yes.
It seems kind of funny that Ettus would make a board that can blast out
20 dBm on Tx, can only tolerate -15 dBm max on Rx, and then have only a
single device that provides only 17-20 dB isolation between the Tx and
Rx.
Hi all,
this discussion started on discuss-gnuradio in case anyone wonders.
Andy, thanks a lot for your detailed answers!
And thanks Marcus for confirming these assumptions.
So, now I only need to worry about spatial separation of my antennas.
Now, the scenario is as follows, I want my system t
On 02/26/2019 10:01 AM, Johannes Demel via USRP-users wrote:
Hi all,
this discussion started on discuss-gnuradio in case anyone wonders.
Andy, thanks a lot for your detailed answers!
And thanks Marcus for confirming these assumptions.
So, now I only need to worry about spatial separation of my
Hi everyone!
We recently bought an E310 to try some very wide band acquisition (from 1GHz to
5GHz) in the fastest way possible. I read about fastlock profiles and was able
to do some early tests by adding the SPI sptr to the UHD tree and retrieving in
the code:
uhd::spi_iface::sptr spi =
usrp
Hey everyone,
Upon building my own custom RFNoC images for an X310 using Vivado GUI, I'm
getting a critical warning stating the following: "Evaluation License
Warning: This design contains one or more evaluation cores that will cease
to function after a certain period of time. This design should N
Yes, you can ignore that error.
Thanks,
Wade
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Leandro EchevarrÃa via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Upon building my own custom RFNoC images for an X310 using Vivado GUI, I'm
> getting a critical warning stating the following:
Hi Marcus:
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 12:00 -0500, usrp-users-requ...@lists.ettus.com
wrote:
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:40:17 -0500
> From: "Marcus D. Leech"
> To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> Subject: Re: [USRP-users] TDD mode with USRPs in GNU Radio
>
> On 02/26/2019 08:41 AM, Andy Wal
On 02/26/2019 12:10 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
Hi Marcus:
If one configures a USRP Sink to use the "TX/RX" port for Tx and a USRP
Source to use "TX/RX" port for Rx, does one still get both switches'
worth of isolation during Tx, or is it only the single switch's worth
of isolation in that case?
(I'm
