Hi Piotr,
I’m not familiar enough with RFNoC to be of assistance there, but your thought
about controlling the flow of samples between the ADC and the radio block seems
to have some merit. We frequently timestamp the sample stream so that we can
then tell the radio to, “Give me samples betwee
Hi Piotr,
I looked through the code in your repo, and it’s a perfect template for the
types of patches and mods I need to make. I had seen the x410_defconfig file
in the kernel recipes and was wondering if I could edit it, or if it was
automatically generated. Seeing that you added a few Xi
Well put. The abstraction really is at the heart of it, isn’t it? Perhaps
that’s why Make was adopted by the hardware world more slowly. Over the last
decade or two, FPGAs have gotten so large, and the external connectivity
options so numerous (1GE, 10GE, 40G, 100G), that hardware designs
On 02/10/2024 20:17, Q W via USRP-users wrote:
Hello,
I just started using USRP for a project. I have a Ettus X310 with a
UBX160, a LFTX and a LFRX installed on the motherboard. The X310
motherboard is quite old purchased in 2016/2017. Labview is used as
the software platform.
After connect
Hello,
I just started using USRP for a project. I have a Ettus X310 with a UBX160, a
LFTX and a LFRX installed on the motherboard. The X310 motherboard is quite old
purchased in 2016/2017. Labview is used as the software platform.
After connecting X310 with PC via 1G Ethernet cable, I was require
On 02/10/2024 20:08, mruane--- via USRP-users wrote:
Hi Marcus!
Hahaha I thoroughly enjoyed the rant! I think you are correct
about Make and its variations. Indispensable seems an understatement
for something that is so pervasive in software development. As I
mentioned, I am primaril
Hi Marcus!
Hahaha I thoroughly enjoyed the rant! I think you are correct about Make
and its variations. Indispensable seems an understatement for something that
is so pervasive in software development. As I mentioned, I am primarily an
FPGA developer. At some point, when the Zynq a
Chris's suggestion worked great. thanks Martin and Chris!
Ryan
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:13 AM Martin Braun wrote:
> Hey Ryan,
>
> Chris' solution will get you running. If you're feeling adventurous, we've
> actually done a lot of work on rfnoc_image_builder since the release, so
> the master br
Hi Piotr,
Thanks! That actually does help quite a bit. You hit perfectly on my main
dilemma: Is it more straightforward to patch the linux-xlnx kernel with the UHD
mods, or do I patch the UHD kernel with the linux-xlnx mods?
The fact that you’ve successfully added linux-xlnx features to the
Hey Ryan,
Chris' solution will get you running. If you're feeling adventurous, we've
actually done a lot of work on rfnoc_image_builder since the release, so
the master branch version of UHD has a fix for this issue (no need to
downgrade ruamel.yaml), but of course it requires building UHD from so
10 matches
Mail list logo
