Re: from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78 performance issues

context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/from-apache-tomcat-7-0-54-to-apache-tomcat-7-0-78-performance-issues-tp5064561p5064744.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users

Re: from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78 performance issues

Dear Taichi, I have not change any log level during this update, where ( which file) should I check -- View this message in context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/from-apache-tomcat-7-0-54-to-apache-tomcat-7-0-78-performance-issues-tp5064561p5064743.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing

Re: from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78 performance issues

How about change log level? Taichi 2017-06-20 22:36 GMT+09:00 Mark Thomas : > On 20/06/2017 13:45, Alireza Fattahi wrote: > > We switched from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78, after > that we face slow loading if the site, even site first page > > > > We are using tomcat datasource.

Re: from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78 performance issues

On 20/06/2017 13:45, Alireza Fattahi wrote: > We switched from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78, after that we > face slow loading if the site, even site first page > > We are using tomcat datasource. > We did not change any application or tomcat parameter during this upgrade. > > >

from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78 performance issues

We switched from apache-tomcat-7.0.54 to apache-tomcat-7.0.78, after that we face slow loading if the site, even site first page We are using tomcat datasource. We did not change any application or tomcat parameter during this upgrade. Any comments? ~Regards, ~~Alireza Fattahi

Re: Severe performance issues on images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Jim, On 6/26/14, 2:47 AM, Jim Lindqvist wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > Thank you for your insights and sorry for a late reply. > > This specific issue seemed do be because of limited bandwidth at > the data centre and it had now been fixed. We are h

Re: Severe performance issues on images

Hi Christopher, Thank you for your insights and sorry for a late reply. This specific issue seemed do be because of limited bandwidth at the data centre and it had now been fixed. We are having some other problem as well, but these seem to come from inefficient modules at the moment and we are in

Re: Severe performance issues on images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Jim, On 6/23/14, 4:21 PM, Jim Lindqvist wrote: > I have I server with Apache and Tomcat through jk_mod and the > perfonrmance is awful. This is mostly confined to images as far as > I know, but it is hard to tell. > > The images are served from Apa

Severe performance issues on images

Hi, I have I server with Apache and Tomcat through jk_mod and the perfonrmance is awful. This is mostly confined to images as far as I know, but it is hard to tell. The images are served from Apache with the help of the following lines: # Serve static content from /resources and /data using Apach

RE: Tomcat 7 Performance Issues when retriving JAR files during TLD file parsing.

Thanks, Mark. We found some information regarding performance issues in Tomcat 7 but could not relate them to the problem we were seeing. This has been raised as bug 51532 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532). -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma

Re: Tomcat 7 Performance Issues when retriving JAR files during TLD file parsing.

On 19/07/2011 21:25, Robert Stoski wrote: > Our best guess is that the different handlers for the URL objects are causing > our performance issues. That looks familiar. Tomcat 7 re-factored the Jar scanning so that consistent code (that fixed some edge case bugs) was used for anno

Tomcat 7 Performance Issues when retriving JAR files during TLD file parsing.

owing results: Tomcat 6: "file:/C:/svn/[PATH_TO_PROJECT]/server/target/snapshot/WEB-INF/lib/[OUR_JAR].jar!/" Tomcat 7: "jndi:/localhost/snapshot/WEB-INF/lib/[OUR_JAR].jar!/" Our best guess is that the different handlers for the URL objects are causing our performance issues. Has an

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 6/30/2011 11:23 AM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I suspect Tomcat might support the lib you mentioned Tomcat does not need to support the library specifically: if a library properly uses the Servlet and/or JSP APIs properly, it should work with Tom

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

: Thu, June 30, 2011 9:19:49 AM Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues... 2011/6/30 Tony Anecito : > Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is Tomcat > 6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's which means 7 has more > issues with this &qu

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

2011/6/30 Tony Anecito : > Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is > Tomcat > 6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's which means 7 has more > issues with this "Standard" taglib. > > I could be wrong but the highest level of support is servlet 2.4 an

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

t 2.5. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Tony Anecito To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wed, June 29, 2011 5:10:33 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues... Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead project seemed like there was no version that s

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead project seemed like there was no version that supported Tomcat 6.0.x. I will continue the message thread onto that group thanks for the advice. I am a tester but the response time was 3-4 seconds. I have not asked the

Re: Performance issues when adding Tomcat JK redirector to IIS's "Default Web Site"?

On 02/15/2010 12:30 PM, Steve Ryan wrote: Are there any known performance issues with the Tomcat JK redirector, in particular, any performance issues which could affect the third-party websites as explained in my example above? Since this is filter it will participate in every request. Now

RE: Performance issues when adding Tomcat JK redirector to IIS's "Default Web Site"?

ter Crowther Sent: 15 February 2010 11:47 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Performance issues when adding Tomcat JK redirector to IIS's "Default Web Site"? Steve, you're likely to get more specific answers if you can tell us versions: what version of the redirector, and

RE: Performance issues when adding Tomcat JK redirector to IIS's "Default Web Site"?

this. My worry is it might impact "Other third-party website". Thanks for your help. Cheers Steve -Original Message- From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther Sent: 15 February 2010 11:47 To: Tomcat Users List Su

Re: Performance issues when adding Tomcat JK redirector to IIS's "Default Web Site"?

ine, however, there are other third-party websites which live under > IIS's "Default Web Site", which means the change I made above (adding the > redirector as an ISAPI Filter on the "Default Web Site") also affects these > third party websites. > > > > So

Performance issues when adding Tomcat JK redirector to IIS's "Default Web Site"?

g the redirector as an ISAPI Filter on the "Default Web Site") also affects these third party websites. So my question is this: Are there any known performance issues with the Tomcat JK redirector, in particular, any performance issues which could affect the third-party websites as

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

Can you run a load test from another computer on the local network? Something like apache AB gives a histogram and you should be able to tell what percentage of your requests is the 5 seconds range. It is best to run it directly to the tomcat private IP that is used inside the local network, to mak

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

sult? >> >> > > I have another production box with different code, but same TomCat > configuration. And time to time I have the same issues. > > TomCat server side code on another box works fast enough (<5 ms per request) > > -- > View this message in context: &g

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

code on another box works fast enough (<5 ms per request) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26888782.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

onse 300 ms > (for external users via browser) > > BUT time to time request/response time is upto 5 seconds for the same users. > How I could figure out a problem? How could I check if it is Tomcat server > problem or not? > > You are very welcome with comments.

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

On 22/12/2009 12:55, Rainer Jung wrote: On 22.12.2009 13:26, DOrlov wrote: Rainer Jung-3 wrote: You can add "%D" to the pattern for the omcat access log, which will output the response time in milliseconds how Tomcat determined it. Already done for most cases values are 0,1,2 ms Max valu

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

On 22.12.2009 13:26, DOrlov wrote: Rainer Jung-3 wrote: You can add "%D" to the pattern for the omcat access log, which will output the response time in milliseconds how Tomcat determined it. Already done for most cases values are 0,1,2 ms Max value which I ever find in the log ~ 20 ms

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

e log ~ 20 ms > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26887542.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

On 22.12.2009 13:13, DOrlov wrote: Pid Ster wrote: Looks OK. When you say the response takes 5s, how are you measuring this? Is it sustained, or is it occasional? Is the server heavily loaded at the time - and again how are you measuring that? What else could be happening? E.g. sending

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

During server work we have meta data reloading time frames ~20 sec per hour -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26887423.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

On 22.12.2009 12:58, Pid wrote: On 22/12/2009 11:34, DOrlov wrote: Pid Ster wrote: Any chance you can upgrade to the most recent Tomcat? How much total physical RAM do you have? Examine the heap "jmap -heap", and post the results. I have 8Gb RAM on the machine. PS Old Generation 4

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

On 22/12/2009 11:34, DOrlov wrote: Pid Ster wrote: Any chance you can upgrade to the most recent Tomcat? How much total physical RAM do you have? Examine the heap "jmap -heap", and post the results. I have 8Gb RAM on the machine. PS Old Generation 47.376815763383185% used PS Pe

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

40995788574219MB) free = 47542480 (45.34004211425781MB) 60.829337266299945% used -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26886984.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

On 22/12/2009 10:18, DOrlov wrote: Pid Ster wrote: What about the exact versions of your OS, JVM and Tomcat? Is your OS a 64bit one? Correct, I use 64bit machine. JVM: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01, mixed mode) OS:

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

-mrsn Linux 2.6.21.7-2.fc8xen x86_64 TomCat: apache-tomcat-6.0.14 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26886252.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive a

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

filename > to move gc logs into separate file. > > Thank you, in this case I'll re-configure server to support it -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26886161.html Sent fro

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

ance problems because of the gc logging (yet). btw add -Xloggc: logfilename to move gc logs into separate file. regards Leon > > We tried to reproduce issue by collecting production logs and reproducing > them via tcpreplay to test server, but we weren't able to reproduce issue &

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

On 22/12/2009 05:48, DOrlov wrote: Zacheusz Siedlecki-2 wrote: This could be problem with memmory and GC. Please show your jvm memmory settings. Regards, Zacheusz Thank you for reply, I use next memory and GC settings: -Xms1024m -Xmx6144m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

27; GC logging? We tried to reproduce issue by collecting production logs and reproducing them via tcpreplay to test server, but we weren't able to reproduce issue :(( Thanks, Denis. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26885080.htm

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

24m -Xmx6144m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m > -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26884294.html > Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

oncMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26884294.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscr

Re: TomCat 6 performance issues

rver works fine and ~ time for request/response 300 ms > (for external users via browser) > > BUT time to time request/response time is upto 5 seconds for the same users. > How I could figure out a problem? How could I check if it is Tomcat server > problem or not? > > You are very we

TomCat 6 performance issues

ds for the same users. How I could figure out a problem? How could I check if it is Tomcat server problem or not? You are very welcome with comments. Thanks, Denis. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26884227.html Sent from the Tom

Re: Performance Issues

don't know how) and check it out. I can really recomend YourKit Java Profiler. /Per Jonsson vdedaniya skrev: Hi All, Our company is using Xplanner as a tool for scrum process. Xplanner is an open source and has been customized by our team to a great extent, recently we have noticed a

Performance Issues

Hi All, Our company is using Xplanner as a tool for scrum process. Xplanner is an open source and has been customized by our team to a great extent, recently we have noticed a lot of Performance issues with Xplanner. The Xplanner set up is as follows: OS:- Linux Application server:- Tomcat

Re: Web Service performance issues

Hi Rajeev, First of all, thanks for your answer. For memory measuring, the best ways seems to be JMX. And then connect to it using some front end application, something like MC4J. I think that by that way I should put inside my web services the JMX code. Could I have a problem that way? Couse

Re: Web Service performance issues

Giovane Moura wrote: Hello, I'm using Muse/Tomcat/Apache on a Linux box (slackware 10.2) in order to run my Web service. And now I need to do a performance test on my Web Service and find out some things: 1. How much memory does my web service consume?Can I measure it with Tomcat Manager?

Web Service performance issues

Hello, I'm using Muse/Tomcat/Apache on a Linux box (slackware 10.2) in order to run my Web service. And now I need to do a performance test on my Web Service and find out some things: 1. How much memory does my web service consume?Can I measure it with Tomcat Manager? Or Via JMX? What's the be

Re: Performance issues with tomcat 5

Thank you very much David, seems like we have to upgrade. On 2/15/06, David Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I was running Apache Cocoon with Tomcat 5.0.28 and a Sun 1.4.2 JVM. > > Unexpectedly the system was falling over at a certain load and not > gracefully slowing down. At a certain

Re: Performance issues with tomcat 5

Hi, I was running Apache Cocoon with Tomcat 5.0.28 and a Sun 1.4.2 JVM. Unexpectedly the system was falling over at a certain load and not gracefully slowing down. At a certain number of concurrent users it was returning very strange errors including Java Out of Memory errors, but only aft

Performance issues with tomcat 5

Hi, has someone ever estimated the max possible load for tomcat? We are suffering from very odd behaviour, as long as tomcat/machine is under certain load it works very well, but then it just "breaks a magical limit" and the performance breaks down. Tomcat or the JVM are starting to leak memory (w