Steve, you're likely to get more specific answers if you can tell us versions: what version of the redirector, and what versions of IIS? Also, can you tell us whose instructions you followed to get it working, as there are some out there that are... how shall I say it... "less than ideal" :-).
Cheers, - Peter On 15 February 2010 11:30, Steve Ryan <st...@acme.ie> wrote: > Dear All > > > > I've tried googling this but can't find much, so I was hoping one of you > guys might be able to help me. > > > > My web application lives under IIS's "Default Web Site". It needs to use the > Tomcat JK redirector, so I have added the redirector as an ISAPI Filter on > the "Default Web Site". This means any websites which live under the > "Default Web Site" will use the redirector. > > > > This is fine, however, there are other third-party websites which live under > IIS's "Default Web Site", which means the change I made above (adding the > redirector as an ISAPI Filter on the "Default Web Site") also affects these > third party websites. > > > > So my question is this: > > > > Are there any known performance issues with the Tomcat JK redirector, in > particular, any performance issues which could affect the third-party > websites as explained in my example above? > > > > Any advice appreciated. > > > > Cheers > > > > Steve > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
