On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:10 AM, DOrlov <dor...@redaril.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Leon Rosenberg-3 wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> you should switch on GC logs and check whether the delays happen at
>> the Full GC Time.
>> You should also start with Xms = Xmx -> both 6144 (why exactly 6144? :-)
>> ).
>>
>> -verbose:gc
>> -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps
>> -XX:+PrintGCDetails
>>
>
> Thank you for comment I will change Xmx, Xms (about 6144, it was set by our
> admin :)))
> About GC logging, I'm afraid that logging will reduce performance (I've
> written, that this is production server). Do you have any figures of
> performance lacks whith 'on' GC logging?

Hello,

I have a lot of high performance sites (2000 requests per second and
more) under my 'umbrella' but have never
encountered any performance problems because of the gc logging (yet).

btw add
-Xloggc: logfilename
to move gc logs into separate file.

regards
Leon


>
> We tried to reproduce issue by collecting production logs and reproducing
> them via tcpreplay to test server, but we weren't able to reproduce issue
> :((
>
> Thanks,
> Denis.
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26885080.html
> Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to