0074060468940215
El mié., 28 de nov. de 2018 11:04 PM, Esther Montes <
esthermontes...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Ola buenas noches nomás para darle mi número de cuenta ok gracias
>
> El mié., 28 de nov. de 2018 10:58 AM, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> escribió:
>
>> -BEGIN
Ola buenas noches nomás para darle mi número de cuenta ok gracias
El mié., 28 de nov. de 2018 10:58 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> André,
>
> On 11/27/18 06:01, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> > I must say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 11/27/18 06:01, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> I must say that, although I tried to participate as much I could, I
> have some reservations about this whole translation project. And
> that is because most of the original messages which I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Andi,
On 11/27/18 05:08, Andi Meister wrote:
> What I did now: - removed Tomcat services by service.bat -
> uninstalled all Tomcats (7 and 9) - uninstalled all Java (was only
> Version 11) - server reboot - Installed Java 11 (File:
> jdk-11.0.1_wind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I'm looking at moving from mod_jk to mod_proxy_http and I'm finding
that a few things don't work "out of the box" like they did with
mod_jk. Specifically, I'm talking about auto-setting values such as
the server name and port that the applicati
On 2018-11-28 11:04, gustavo.avitab...@unina.it wrote:
Quoting Christopher Schultz :
André,
On 11/26/18 08:35, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
On 26.11.2018 13:29, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 9:48 AM Ludovic Pénet
wrote:
Le vendredi 23 novembre 2018 à 23:51 +0100, Rémy Mau
Quoting Christopher Schultz :
André,
On 11/26/18 08:35, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
On 26.11.2018 13:29, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 9:48 AM Ludovic Pénet
wrote:
Le vendredi 23 novembre 2018 à 23:51 +0100, Rémy Maucherat a
écrit :
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:58 AM Mar
hi.
1) I have removed the previous correspondence from this email, because by now it has
become pretty much unreadable anyway.
Also, there are 2 links at the bottom of your last email (to "avg"-something). I don't
know if these are supposed to provide some additional information, but they both
