s this code.
>>> Actually I need role based security in my app.
>>> And one more thing I want to say I like your blog but some of the things I
>>> don't understand
>>> in your post. usually most of the part is code and less explanation. So it
>&g
explanation. So it
>> very hard to understand for beginners like me.
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Gaurav P Singh
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ANN-A-Tapestry5-Based-Security-Module-tp332245
iew this message in context:
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ANN-A-Tapestry5-Based-Security-Module-tp3322452p5560248.html
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ome of the things I
don't understand
in your post. usually most of the part is code and less explanation. So it
very hard to understand for beginners like me.
Thanks & Regards
Gaurav P Singh
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ANN-A-Tapestry5
t 8:05 PM, Angelo C. wrote:
> it's a nice module, but not even posted in java magic?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ANN-A-Tapestry5-Based-Security-Module-tp3322452p4514269.html
> Sent from the Tapestry
it's a nice module, but not even posted in java magic?
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ANN-A-Tapestry5-Based-Security-Module-tp3322452p4514269.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
I too get the same error.
-Original Message-
From: Angelo C. [mailto:angelochen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:23 AM
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] A Tapestry5 Based Security Module
Hi Taha,
where to get this source code, everytime I click the link it
Hi Taha,
where to get this source code, everytime I click the link it says:
403. That’s an error.
Your client does not have permission to get URL /p/tapestry-addons/ from
this server. That’s all we know
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ANN-A-Tapestry5-Based
This is cool, I'd like to try it.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 17:47, Taha Hafeez wrote:
> yes there is. I am working on a tutorial about this module
>
> taha
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Dmitry Gusev >wrote:
>
> > Yes, I guess it might work. Do you already have AuthorityVoter support?
> >
yes there is. I am working on a tutorial about this module
taha
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Dmitry Gusev wrote:
> Yes, I guess it might work. Do you already have AuthorityVoter support?
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:38, Taha Hafeez
> wrote:
>
> > Will this work
> >
> > interface Buisness
Yes, I guess it might work. Do you already have AuthorityVoter support?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:38, Taha Hafeez wrote:
> Will this work
>
> interface BuisnessObject {
> public String getOwner();
> }
>
> class Foo implements BusinessObject {
> }
>
>
> class BusinessObjectVoter extends Author
Will this work
interface BuisnessObject {
public String getOwner();
}
class Foo implements BusinessObject {
}
class BusinessObjectVoter extends AuthorityVoter {
public void vote(Subject, Object object, Vote vote){
if(object instanceof BuisnessObject){
BusinessObject bs = (
No, it can't. Role model is not enough here. I don't want _any_ manger to
update _any_ foo instance.
I want that *only manager created the foo instance* could update it. Can I
do that with your lib?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:04, Taha Hafeez wrote:
> Can't that be achieved by securing service/da
Can't that be achieved by securing service/dao methods
@RequiresLogin
public interface FooDAO {
@RequiresRole("ADMIN")
public void add(Foo foo);
@RequiresRole("MANAGER")
public void update(Foo foo);
}
regards
Taha
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Gusev wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible
Hi
Is it possible using your library to implement security assertions based on
business rules?
For instance, only allow object owner or admins to edit this object?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 14:38, Taha Hafeez wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have made a number of changes in the project to support @Requires*
> a
Hi
I have made a number of changes in the project to support @Requires*
annotations. There is support for voting and adding new voters and
providers. Adding custom annotation is also very easy. There is also support
for regular-expression based page-authorization if you don't like
annotations or l
Hi Werner
I think it can be... It can act as a tapestry-layer over any
security/authentication framework...
Will try to add an example for such a use but overall I want this as a
standalone role-based access and permission-based access model for
tapestry which is apt for small projects and can b
Hi,
Is this related or may be used with SSO technologies like OpenID, SAML or
OAuth?
Werner
Taha,
I'm waiting.
2010/12/30 Taha Hafeez
> Thanks
>
> There are three build-in rules Role, Principal, IP
>
> You can create your own rule by implementing the interface
>
> package com.google.code.tapestryaddons.security;
>
> public interface SecurityRuleHandler {
>
> boolean matches(String v
Thanks
There are three build-in rules Role, Principal, IP
You can create your own rule by implementing the interface
package com.google.code.tapestryaddons.security;
public interface SecurityRuleHandler {
boolean matches(String value);
}
e.g I implemented the IP rule like this
public cla
Taha, congratulations.
how do I implement my rules?
example:
User: rules, rules, etc..
write a documentation explaining how it works. could be the actual site of
the project.
abs.
2010/12/30 Taha Hafeez
> Hi
>
> I have created a tapestry-security project based on tapestry5 with no
> dependen
Hi
I have created a tapestry-security project based on tapestry5 with no
dependencies on any security frameworks...
SMALL INTRODUCTION
---
It supports Roles, Principals & IP for now and I intend to add permissions
also..
there are three components
IfPri
22 matches
Mail list logo
