Hi Angelo I have removed it along with other modules I had placed there. The reason being the confusion that is already there with modules. This is the only thing I don't like about tapestry. There is no standardization of extensions in tapestry like there is in spring(spring-extensions), wicket(wicketstuff), play etc.
IMHO, some kind of standardization is a must. Whenever a new module comes it should be evaluated by the developers/committers and voted as a level 1 module, after which there can be different levels(based on support, quality, downloads, user rating, incubation time etc) and if a module passes these stages it can then enter "tapestry-extensions". This has many advantages 1. Any developer searching for an feature/integration can compare different extensions based on their levels/rating etc. 2. High quality extensions 3. A plus point for newcomers who are out there evaluating different frameworks based on features & integration with third party libraries. That said, I will make it a point to write some blog posts about that module and put it on github as soon as possible. Thanks for showing interest in it. regards Taha On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Angelo C. <angelochen...@gmail.com> wrote: > it's a nice module, but not even posted in java magic? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/ANN-A-Tapestry5-Based-Security-Module-tp3322452p4514269.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
