Will this work
interface BuisnessObject {
public String getOwner();
}
class Foo implements BusinessObject {
}
class BusinessObjectVoter extends AuthorityVoter<BusinessVoter> {
public void vote(Subject, Object object, Vote vote){
if(object instanceof BuisnessObject){
BusinessObject bs = (BusinessObject)object;
if(bs.getOwner().equals(subject.getName()){
vote.allow();
}else {
vote.deny();
}
}
}
public boolean supports(Object object){
return object instanceof BusinessObject;
}
}
regards
Taha
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Dmitry Gusev <dmitry.gu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> No, it can't. Role model is not enough here. I don't want _any_ manger to
> update _any_ foo instance.
> I want that *only manager created the foo instance* could update it. Can I
> do that with your lib?
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:04, Taha Hafeez <tawus.tapes...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Can't that be achieved by securing service/dao methods
>
>
> > @RequiresLogin
> > public interface FooDAO {
> >
> > @RequiresRole("ADMIN")
> > public void add(Foo foo);
> >
> > @RequiresRole("MANAGER")
> > public void update(Foo foo);
> > }
> >
> > regards
> > Taha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Gusev <dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Is it possible using your library to implement security assertions
> based
> > on
> > > business rules?
> > > For instance, only allow object owner or admins to edit this object?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 14:38, Taha Hafeez <tawus.tapes...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I have made a number of changes in the project to support @Requires*
> > > > annotations. There is support for voting and adding new voters and
> > > > providers. Adding custom annotation is also very easy. There is also
> > > > support
> > > > for regular-expression based page-authorization if you don't like
> > > > annotations or like to keep security in AppModule only
> > > >
> > > > It is an example of how easy tapestry5 is. Even implementing a full
> > > > authorization module is so easy!!!
> > > >
> > > > The link is
> > > > http://code.google.com/p/tapestryauth
> > > >
> > > > <http://code.google.com/p/tapestryauth> regards
> > > > Taha
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Taha Hafeez <
> > tawus.tapes...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Werner
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it can be... It can act as a tapestry-layer over any
> > > > > security/authentication framework...
> > > > >
> > > > > Will try to add an example for such a use but overall I want this
> as
> > a
> > > > > standalone role-based access and permission-based access model for
> > > > > tapestry which is apt for small projects and can be extended to
> > larger
> > > > > projects too..
> > > > >
> > > > > But any suggestions will be more than helpful and especially
> > > corrections
> > > > > and criticism,,,
> > > > >
> > > > > regards
> > > > > Taha
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Werner Keil <
> werner.k...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is this related or may be used with SSO technologies like OpenID,
> > SAML
> > > > or
> > > > >> OAuth?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Werner
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dmitry Gusev
> > >
> > > AnjLab Team
> > > http://anjlab.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dmitry Gusev
>
> AnjLab Team
> http://anjlab.com
>
