I was just asking if it could be possible to add new custom configuration
types. I've already develop what i need and I'm building the tree myself.
It works well and it is very clear on how to contribute to the service.
This email's purpose was to acquire more knowledge about tapestry.
Le mar. 5
Ok, so you don't think it should be a core concept but you also don't want
to build the tree yourself? Something's gotta give!
It's probably best to define the interface you'd like to interact with /
contribute to. I'm sure there's a tapestry-ioc friendly way to achieve what
you want.
I thought that tapestry was doing magic... I'm disapointed :D
Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 14:49, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
a écrit :
> On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze wrote:
>
> > Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible
> > in so may aspects
>
> Indeed
On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze wrote:
Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible
in so may aspects
Indeed it is . . .
that maybe, it could have been for configuration type.
But one of the most important ways Tapestry-IoC accomplish that is exa
Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in
so may aspects that maybe, it could have been for configuration type.
Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 12:44, Lance Java a écrit :
> I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be
> different case by case.
I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be
different case by case. The TypeCoercer and it's CoercionTuple are another
example of a tree like structure being built by an UnorderedConfiguration.
https://tapestry.apache.org/type-coercion.html
On 4 May 2015 13:14, "Charl
Thanks for your suggestion. I will
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Dimitris Zenios
wrote:
> I would go with a custom component directly instead of button and mixin
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Chung Khanh Duy <
> chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I intend to write a new component
I would go with a custom component directly instead of button and mixin
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Chung Khanh Duy <
chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend to write a new component and use it many places in project if
> possible. That is the reason why I am finding a good example fo
I intend to write a new component and use it many places in project if
possible. That is the reason why I am finding a good example for mixins.
Example you can use as usual and then assign the mixins if you
want it as dropdown button.
Thanks.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Dimitris Zenios
wrot
Why do you need a mixin for that.This is plain html there.What exactly are
trying to achieve?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Chung Khanh Duy <
chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, it is similar with
> http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html.
>
> Thanks.
>
> O
Hi,
Yes, it is similar with
http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html.
Thanks.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Dimitris Zenios
wrote:
> Hi
>
> By split button you mean bootstrap button groups?
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy <
> chungkhanhduy1...@gmail
Hi
By split button you mean bootstrap button groups?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I
> appreciate.
>
> Thanks.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
