On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze <m...@charlouze.com> wrote:

Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in so may aspects

Indeed it is . . .

that maybe, it could have been for configuration type.

But one of the most important ways Tapestry-IoC accomplish that is exactly through distributed configuration, so how could you contribute another distributed configuration using distributed configuration? :D

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to