I was just asking if it could be possible to add new custom configuration types. I've already develop what i need and I'm building the tree myself. It works well and it is very clear on how to contribute to the service.
This email's purpose was to acquire more knowledge about tapestry. Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 15:19, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> a écrit : > Ok, so you don't think it should be a core concept but you also don't want > to build the tree yourself? Something's gotta give! > > It's probably best to define the interface you'd like to interact with / > contribute to. I'm sure there's a tapestry-ioc friendly way to achieve what > you want. >
