My recollection is that something was eating the TXT results; but not the A
records.
Probably a PIX or something like that, it broke ESMTP pretty badly too.
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 06:34, RW wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:39:25 -0700
> Dave Warren wrote:
>
>>>
uages
#dcc
use_dcc 1
dcc_path /usr/local/bin/dccproc
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
#razor
use_razor2 1
razor_config /etc/razor/razor-agent.conf
thanks
dave
[mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:27 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: rules and configuration not running correctly
On 10/24/2014 06:17 PM, dave wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I am running Spamassassin 3.4 on an Ubuntu 14.04 build. The server
> installation i
unning correctly
On 10/24/2014 06:34 PM, dave wrote:
> Thanks... I am looking to have x-spam status and associated scores
> added to the headers of all messages ... also my custom and sought
> rules do not seem to fire
Please keep list mail on the list.
- How are you using SA?
(pls
Anyone have any ideas??
-Original Message-
From: dave
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:51 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> SA Mailing list
Subject: RE: rules and configuration not running correctly
(Sorry about the list thing realized after sending) It is launched from
Received !~ /\.com\b/I || Received !~ /\.net\b/I || Received !~
/\.org\b/I || Received !~ /\.edu\b/I || Received !~ /\.uk\b/I
describe GC_TLD Not common TLD
score GC_TLD 2
Can someone help me out or point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Dave
Grolen Communications
da...@grolen.com<mai
till running even tho it's
not mentioned in sendmail?
TIA
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David SternUniversity of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
with
$SPAMHOME/bin/spamd -d --syslog-socket=inet -r /var/tmp/spamdnew.pid \
--allowed-ips=
But I don't even see anything in syslog on hostB.
TIA
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David SternUniversity of Mar
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Dave Goodrich wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is involved in setting up spamassassin to run on a remote machine?
After installing it on hostA (mailserver) and hostB, I get onto hostA
and tweak my procmailrc to have
:0fw: $HOME/spamassassin.lock
| $SPAMHOME/bin/spamc -d
:RC:0(68.230.240.31):SA:1(5.3/5.0):. Processed in 6.255823 secs
Process 8768)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 14:23:43 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [SPAM] this is a test
testing the new SA system, lemme know h
mes you can just say:
use "/my/perl_directory";
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David SternUniversity of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Dave,
use lib "/my/perl_directory/lib/site_perl";
or sometimes you can just say:
use "/my/perl_directory";
is it enough to add it to Makefile.PL, or do I need to add it to every single
SpamAssassin .PL file?
No, The "
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Dave,
No, The "use" construct tells perl to look elsewhere for libraries when
running. All of the above assumes you're installing the modules somewhere
other than where the system would normally look for it. eg You don't
an be running SA remotely
on another machine (users run spamc -d sa.machine.com)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David SternUniversity of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
st and run. (Of course, then you have to deal with
the lower level of security of people being able to ssh w/out passwd
to the other machine)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David SternUniversity of Maryland
e larger users and I
know there are users with personal installs on SA as well.
To believe there is one best practice for using anything is painting
with a very large brush.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do t
d over. Some
times that IP is only one of our MX's. We finally call them and insist
they reboot their server. Then wala, it works. I dread taking down a MX
for maint, even when the DNS has been expired for a month in advance.
I hate spammers, hate 'em, hate 'em, hate 'em. They
smaller and smaller. I would love
to have numbers like 10% spam along with no customer complaints. That
would mean spam was slowing down and I could spend that anti-spam money
on other things I need for our NOCs. Things that make us money.
But I understand your point, I take everything written/spoken/
d based on mismatched URLs you would tag the
same messages incorrectly.
Just my experience.
DAve
--
I've been asking Google for a Veteran's Day logo since 2000,
maybe 1999. I was told they finally did a Veteran's Day logo,
but none of the links I was given return anything but
7 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 144.269 ms 72.000 ms
71.572 ms
8 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 100.388 ms 102.816 ms
107.478 ms
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
Same result from Indiana USA, dies at telia.net.
DAve
--
Google finally, after 7 years, provided a
WHOIS_NOLDC
WHOIS_NOMINET
WHOIS_PRIVACYPOST
WHOIS_PRIVDOMAIN
WHOIS_PRIVPROT
WHOIS_REGISTER4LESS
WHOIS_REGISTERFLY
WHOIS_REGTEK
WHOIS_SAFENAMES
WHOIS_SECINFOSERV
WHOIS_SECUREWHOIS
WHOIS_SPAMFREE
WHOIS_SRSPLUS
WHOIS_UNLISTED
WHOIS_WHOISGUARD
WHOIS_WHOISPROT
Thanks,
DAve
--
In 50 years
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.04.08 10:52, DAve wrote:
We recently upgraded to SA 3.2.4 and are experiencing much slower
processing. After watching my rule hits for a few days I would like to
remove some rules (set score to 0) to gain back some speed.
Ami I correct in believing that
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.04.08 10:52, DAve wrote:
We recently upgraded to SA 3.2.4 and are experiencing much slower
processing. After watching my rule hits for a few days I would like to
remove some rules (set score to 0) to gain back some speed.
Ami I correct in believing that
the setup you describe implemented via MailScanner, MailWatch,
and Sendmail+milter-ahead. Works very well.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing f
ver
stop seeking, never, 24/7/365. A consumer grade storage device would
scream "mommy" and wet itself.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but noth
wrote:
| Between two mail gateways and three toasters we have 14 disks that never
| stop seeking, never, 24/7/365. A consumer grade storage device would
| scream "mommy" and wet itself.
|
| DAve
OK, I'm sorry for changing the subject but I have had good results with 18 and
Shane Williams wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, John Andersen wrote:
On Sunday 16 July 2006 06:35 am, Shane Williams wrote:
I never realized SpamAssassin was started back in 1994. What version
number was that? I'd say it was definitely ahead of its time, since I
almost never got email spam until
of curiosity I moved my updates.spamassassin.org* out to /tmp and reran
the debug, same results. Logs show the last time I was getting hits was
4 days ago.
What have I done wrong?
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do
DAve wrote:
Good morning,
I noticed this morning that I am no longer hitting any URIBL and SURBL.
I did a test,
host -tTXT test.uribl.com.multi.uribl.com
and got the proper response. I also ran
spamassassin -D < testemail.txt
which is a message with a URI known in the URIBL list and
DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Good morning,
I noticed this morning that I am no longer hitting any URIBL and
SURBL. I did a test,
host -tTXT test.uribl.com.multi.uribl.com
and got the proper response. I also ran
spamassassin -D < testemail.txt
which is a message with a URI known in the UR
Dig works, host works. Not sure why SA can't get a lookup. I've
restarted dnscache several times, and I have my normal dns servers
listed under 127.0.0.1 in /etc/resolv.conf.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day.
DAve wrote:
Richard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I noticed this morning that I am no longer hitting any URIBL and
SURBL. I did a test,
...
I should have included this in the debug output.
[23441] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[23441] dbg: dns
DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Richard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I noticed this morning that I am no longer hitting any URIBL and
SURBL. I did a test,
...
I should have included this in the debug output.
[23441] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, August 7, 2006, 1:56:41 PM, DAve DAve wrote:
In frustration I edited /etc/resolv.conf and removed 127.0.0.1, URI
lookups are completing and MailScanner is blasting through the queues on
both machines exceedingly fast now.
No idea what could have possibly changed
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:05:04 AM, DAve DAve wrote:
I had no logging running on dnscache before so I don't *know* what was
happening. I re-enabled logging and the issue went away. To be specific
I changed my run file from
exec setuidgid Gdnslog multilog -*
to
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
DAve wrote:
[snip]
If it happens again I'll have some logs, provided I catch it in time,
dnscache makes logs like bunnies make more bunnies.
Until then I'm inclined to think it was a resource issue or anomaly on
my system rather than an issue with SA or dnsca
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, DAve wrote:
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Dave, you might need to update the 'root/servers/@' file. IIRC, a
couple of root servers have changed in the past few years.
We replace the @ file with one of our own on every server. I contains
just our dns s
I noticed that if I have updates_spamassassin_org.cf in place in my
rules dir, my local.cf rule changes are set back to default.
I tried to post, but that soesn't seem to be an option today. If anyone
is interested it's here.
http://pixelhammer.com/local-cf.txt
DAve
--
Three year
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
I noticed that if I have updates_spamassassin_org.cf in place in my
rules dir, my local.cf rule changes are set back to default.
I tried to post, but that soesn't seem to be an option today. If
anyone is interested it's here.
http://pixelhammer.com/lo
think it needs fixed, but a warning
that I was acting like a luser using my site rules dir would have been nice.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothi
y moot. What files are in what directories doesn't
really matter. It seems the idea is that anyone reading all the
documentation, and the wiki, should be able to discern what will go
where, in what order, why, and when.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't hav
like SARE rules be the purpose for channels in
sa-update? What other possible purpose could there be for allowing
multiple channels other than to update more than the distributed rule set?
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day.
porium.com
/var/lib/spamassassin/$VER/updates.sare-header.rulesemporium.com
/var/lib/spamassassin/$VER/updates.tls.local
/var/lib/spamassassin/$VER/updates.someOtherRulesHouse.com
This would leave /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin containing only the
local site specific .pre files and local.cf
e between that and having a
channel for every rule subset.
Bret
Are there stats available for what SARE rules are downloaded in what
numbers? That would tell you rightaway if popular groups of rules could
be created and made available.
I'm building a channel now for use internally. If i
Give them code from Ocr.pm:--- foreach my $p ( $pms->{msg}->find_parts("image") ) { my ( $ctype, $boundary, $charset, $name ) =Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::parse_content_type( $p->get_header('content-type') ); if ( $ctype eq "image/gif" ) { open OCR, "
pular files would be the
best way, "sets" so to speak. Though I am not against a channel for each
file, I think it would be a sure fire way to clutter
/var/lib/spamassassin though.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?
Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.
DAve wrote:
I ran into one issue but I haven't gotten a chance to look deeper into
it yet. The sha1 file on updates.spamassassin.org is in one format, and
he sha1 file I create is in another. Currently sa-update can't parse my
file so I had to edit it.
SpamAssassin sha1 contents
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:12:48PM -0400, DAve wrote:
SpamAssassin sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the signature first,
f7c3edde6e9e2330318c3fc6a8e70af68387eaeb
/home/updatesd/tmp/stage/3.2.0/update.tgzSHA1
My sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the
e earliest I can find it on
my servers is 5.4, using the FreeBSD included openssl.
It might show up when I upgrade the port.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?
Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.
DAve wrote:
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not
Bill Randle wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:35 -0400, DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the forma
so there is a bit of dusting off of
braincells to do.
Any thoughts on popular sets?
No one from SARE has said a word about this yet, any problem with me
publishing SARE rules?
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they c
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
I have it working fine here, about 20 lines of /bin/sh and and I can
turn out any number of rule sets, even a channel per SARE rule.
I'm willing to publish the channels if there is interest in them. I
still believe packages or sets of popular rules would be
works on Windows.
cool ;) I'm amazed GPG does.
I am too, but it works surprisingly well with GPG for Windows. ;)
Bret
I think a status report would be a good option as well. SA already asks
you for your admins email address at install time. Sending a report of
what happened durin
, that's what's really
important to know IMO.
What he said.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?
Maybe they forgot
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:56:00AM -0400, DAve wrote:
I think a status report would be a good option as well. SA already asks
you for your admins email address at install time. Sending a report of
what happened during the sa-update process would be very, very valuable
s-phishing. Now the stocks are rising again. Came at a bad bad time
for us.
My smtp refusals are running about 120k to 140k per day, 80k to 90k are
getting in, and I'm delivering 25k. The rest are grabbed by SA and
MailScanner.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don
nels if others are interested, some SARE rules,
maybe others if requested. If it works and is well received, possibly
Doctor Doolittle and the EuropeanAntiSpamConsortium will consider
providing channels for their own rules, maybe even SARE. Who knows?
exit 0
DAve
--
Three years now I've aske
rules. Not sure how to
handle that, or if users/authors will even care. Possibly authors would
be willing to tar, gzip, and sign their rules if they were provided an
upload facility.
Just some thoughts. Thanks for taking the time to do this, I think it
will be welcomed once the word gets out.
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 8/13/2006 4:49 PM, DAve wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
Emporium website (http://w
using SA to stop the backscatter after the
fact is not the best way to go about this. I wouldn't worry about the
high load on your FirstClass system, stop the spam from getting past the
qmail server and your load will likely drop considerably. If you get as
much spam as we do anyway ;^)
0.1 13,705 99.9
DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO 6,37721 0.3 6,356 99.7
DC_GIF_MULTI_LARGO 46618 3.9 448 96.1
That is from a total of 500k messages processed in the last 7 days.
Very nice, it has made a big difference here.
DAve
--
Three years now I&#x
s
accepted and gets a high SA score, and you can still determine the
sending IP, then that might be automatically harvested also.
Thoughts? Does somethign like this have any value?
Loren
Something like http://dhsield.org, but limited to email instead of all
ports?
DAve
--
Three
jdow wrote:
From: "DAve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Loren Wilton wrote:
It was mentioned that several people are getting hammered by
world-wide robot attacks. I see from the little spam I get that
there is a new spam sending tool for robots that is running a stock
spam. I suspec
s URIBL and SURBL before I would consider that.
Is there a way around the dependencies? The FreeBSD port shows the
following, xorg-libraries-6.9.0, ghostscript-gnu-7.07_15, teTeX-3.0_1,
tcl-8.4.13_1 (TCL?), and all their dependancies. Plus a lot more.
I'd need to look at configure --help.
is a good
concept, works well, and fills a needed space.
They have a mail list and several users are here and on the MailScanner
list as well.
DAve
Ken A.
Pacific.Net
Eric Persson wrote:
This might be a shot in the dark, but after running a patched qmail,
qmailscanner with spamassassin and
Ken A wrote:
DAve wrote:
Ken A wrote:
http://mailwatch.sourceforge.net/
Doesn't do per user SA rule scores since it works with MailScanner,
and MailScanner doesn't support that, but does do pretty much
everything else SA, clamav and MailScanner do, including logging to
mysql,
ople have gotten
eighty-two-hundred-bazillion hits on a search engine, 99% of which are
unrelated, by using a simplistic search. Folks learn to be very specific
when searching.
Maybe each article on the wiki should be indexed to a specific config
option, or options? Just a thought.
DAve
--
Thre
ortly
after they move out on their own, they realize Mom and Dad were not so
stupid after all ;^)
Two boys, 19 and 15, wouldn't trade them for fame or fortune.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do
ecord when
no mail server failure occurred?
Just about any MS Exchange server. I have never had a valid message from
qmail/Sendmail/Postfix/Exim go to that server. Always Exchange, and
generally from a small business with a "shrink wrap admin" running the
mail services.
DAve
--
Joe Zitnik wrote:
A simple no would have sufficed.
But I so enjoyed the answer. What was the question again?
DAve
On 10/10/2006 at 4:25 PM, Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Zitnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10,
attachments before scanning/learning highly desirable. IME this would be
a real performance boost and have a very minor, if any, impact on
SpamAssassin's ability to detect spam. At least in my mail environment.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo c
spam within the quarantine and
we send a daily quarantine report to each user every day. The user can
then log into their quarantine and release spam messages which will then
be delivered normally.
We use a heavily modified version of MailWatch for MailScanner to do this.
DAve
--
Three years now I&
note from Jesus to get a message
delivered through the server.
All that traffic is not connecting to my primary mail gateway ;^)
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-internationa
then never try the highest, just
fail.
With the current setup a valid message will eventually get through.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothi
.
DAve
Isn't that how it is suppose to work? Try the lowest first?
MX 10 and MX 20 are my mailgateways, the lowest MX or the highest
priority MX. And MX 30 is my highest MX or my lowest priority MX, and
the server that gets the Spam and the Exchange connections.
MX 10, often refered
no faith in a server that was running the
"latest" distro/RPM/package just because it was "the latest".
If you rely on the version number of your distro and the build skills of
an unknown party to be the extent of your security awareness, you are
certain to end up on someones RBL.
DAve
seeing this besides me. I suspect the
spammers are making a new attempt to find web forms they can abuse and
possibly the robots are just not smart enough to know that our forms
don't work the way they suspect.
DAve
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Mittwoch, 14. September 2005 16:03 DAve wrote:
the robots are just not smart enough to know that our forms
don't work the way they suspect.
Maybe rename the script? Could be there's a script of that name which is
vulnerable...
mfg zmi
All our form
rying (#3 of 3): Connection refused
Can I presume these are just an indication of resource limits?
Thanks
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David SternUniversity of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
rying (#3 of 3): Connection refused
Can I presume these are just an indication of resource limits?
TIA
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David SternUniversity of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
o expect
people to just "give me the answer".
Likely the answer you need is in the below link.
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/
If you must ask for help, read the link below FIRST!
http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html
DAve
ser base active, the tools up to date. I've run Sendmail, Exim, Postfix
as well. All have their place.
qmail works quite well with spamc and there are several ways to use the
two together. I would argue there are more ways to combine spamc and
qmail than any other mailserver. Choose the best tool for the job.
DAve
high mail volumes, yet the IPs they list
have port 25 blocked at the client router.
I have send two emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and received no replys
so far. Am I spinning my wheels here?
DAve
Matt Kettler wrote:
DAve wrote:
Good afternoon,
I take a look each week at senderbase to check and see what others think
my network is sending out in terms of mail volume. I generally find it
helpful.
http://senderbase.org
Anyone else using that report? I ask because I have two IPs showing
global maildroprc and captured the return
code of spamc and I am seeing a return code of 74 (io error) in the
logs. I would have expected to see 69 (not available) or 75 (temp error)
if I was having a problem reaching spamd.
Any idea why I would be getting a return code of 74?
Thanks,
DAve
;fail" to
report the host name or IP, the mail admin "failed" to properly
configure his choosen mail server software.
DAve
.
The local DNS cache is reaching out to a common DNS cache inside the
same network which is doing all the outside DNS lookups for mail
services. The common cache is cycling around once an hour.
SA routinely takes less than a second per message with several URLs in
the message. Does that help?
ed by EMAILBL.
EMAILBL hit 15 that were not already tagged as spam. Seems like this
plugin hit almost in lock step with the JM_SOUGHT rules here.
I will continue to run it on both servers for a week and see what happens.
DAve
--
"Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present gen
the update, for now the last five days stats are as
follows.
Total mail through SA = 208,498
Total spam messages tagged with EMAILBL = 1471
Total non spam messages tagged with EMAILBL = 128
FP seen = 0
(fully %80 of our traffic never gets to SA)
DAve
--
"Posterity, you will know how much
pproaching 600k when things get bad. We have a wide variety
of clients from dialup/DSL users to corporate users. Our clients receive
mail from Europe and the Pacific Rim regularly.
I'm just sayin...
DAve
--
"Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present generation to
preserve y
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:50 -0400, DAve wrote:
I will see about the update, for now the last five days stats are as
follows.
Total mail through SA = 208,498
Total spam messages tagged with EMAILBL = 1471
Total non spam messages tagged with EMAILBL = 128
What
email/spam lists they wouldn't allow us to use half the
software we do.
DAve
Quoting Res :
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
1. It's 'You're' a joke - not 'your' a joke
Ah the classic sign of someone in defeat, has to nit pick someones
ess who or what gets whitelisted in any app/device. I care
about whether it can be turned off easily or not.
If the majority of SA users find CC gives little or no spam, let SA add
CC to a whitelist by default. Better to let some spam in by default then
to keep ham out.
Just don't t
Snow
I am not particularly interested in having to go a shop for information
when I can have it sent to me. List mail also has the advantage of being
fully compatible with plain text viewing, at my leisure.
Feel free though to start a forum if you wish.
DAve
--
"Posterity, you will know h
LOCAL_RCVD Received =~ /.*\(\S+\.example\.com\s+\[.*\]\)/
describe LOCAL_RCVD Received from mail.example.com
Thanks.
Dave.
like yours, if the
primary goes down for maintence or whatever the backup holds messages then
relays when the primary is back.
Thanks.
Dave.
Hello,
Mail from my backup mx is not being scanned for spam as it's coming
in. Is this something i'd have to turn on at the MTA level, content filter,
or SA? A majority of stuff my backup mx sends me is spam and i'd like to get
it tagged as such.
Thanks.
Dave.
Hi,
Postfix on my server, the backup mx is using qmail.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Smith [mailto:gary.sm...@holdstead.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:03 PM
To: 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: RE: SA and
Hello,
I'm trying to add additional sa rules and wanted to use the sare
channels referenced by the wiki. I'm using sa 3.2.5 and when i atempted to
get updates from saupdates.openprotect.com the channel didn't exist. Has it
moved?
Thanks.
Dave.
1 - 100 of 855 matches
Mail list logo
