rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 10:36 -0700, SM wrote:
At 10:56 05-07-2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
Well, I can only take you at face value that you are here representing
Constant Contact. If I call up the office switchboard Tara, can I speak
with you there? It's just I've called up Constant Contact and hit #9 for
the directory and your name is not in there? Perhaps there is a
misspelling or something?
The name is spelled correctly. I consider that the person is
speaking on behalf of that organization based on the message posted (
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200907.mbox/%3cac9ad70907041849m735b0b68mb0909b83216b0...@mail.gmail.com%3e
)
Regards,
-sm
That's great - but we have already established that a few hours ago. As
you are keen to offer your opinion and experience;
Have you handled spam or irate customer getting spam from Constant
Contact?
What do you think about Constant Contact having a white list score in
Spamassassin despite being listed in the multi.uri?
What do you think about them being white listed by Barracuda?
I'm keen to hear a cross section of views.
I could care less who or what gets whitelisted in any app/device. I care
about whether it can be turned off easily or not.
If the majority of SA users find CC gives little or no spam, let SA add
CC to a whitelist by default. Better to let some spam in by default then
to keep ham out.
Just don't take away my switch.
DAve
--
"Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present generation to
preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you
do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to
preserve it." John Quincy Adams
http://appleseedinfo.org
