o peruse it.
I have attempted to find the problem in this file, but don't understand
it enough, or the problem is not actually in there.
Any help anyone can give me would be truly appreciated!
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Linux Systems Administrator
Manux Solutions Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://www.manux.co.nz>
Re: Bayes database corrupt.
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:02:23AM +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to fix a corrupted Bayes Database ?
>
> Why do you think the DB is corrupt? All you said is that the children
> were
> doing processing on the DB
Hi all,
Recently upgraded SA to 3.1.7 (the latest supported by Debian Sarge
backports.).
I just caught a nasty problem with our Bayes Database. Spamd children
were trying to use 99% CPU each (5 of them) and were hanging not doing
any processing. I discovered that there was in issue with our
ailed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-learn line 78.
I am used to getting similar sa-learn errors, but not ones that cause
problems when spamd or Spamassassin is manually run. Can anyone please
define what "strict subs" is used for and if I should disable it to
allow MAX_URI
John wrote:
> Those are compile errors in the core SA code. Your install appears to
> be corrupted.
>
> Has anyone been editing the files under /usr/share/perl5/Mail/ ?
>
> You will probably need to wipe and reinstall SA from scratch. Note
> that your local rules and bayes database shouldn't be
This is a good place to start, especially if you want to understand Meta
rule writing:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
The rest is up to your knowledge of Perl regular expressions and
applying them to match spam. Beware downloading 3rd party custom rules,
as what works for
> -Original Message-
> I think you might need to uncomment
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
>
> in /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre (or your equivalent).
>
> As an aside, I'm afraid I simply reject some of them out of hand if
they
> contain a particular MIME charset
> -Original Message-
> > > We're suddenly getting a ton of spam with koi8-r encoding...I
tried to
> > > do a custom rule for it like this:
> > >
> > > header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject =~/koi8-r/i
> > > describe SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR has Russian char encoding
> > > score SUBJ_RUSS_C
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 2:19 p.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:07 p.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> Now what about matching a question mark and an equals sign?
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:07 p.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>
> > Now what about m
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:43 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:19 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
&g
> -Original Message-
> For the most part you can match any character by the appearance of the
> character. Any character with special meaning needs to be escaped in
some
> way. The easiest way is usually with a backslash, but in some cases
you
> can
> also do it by making it a member of
-Original Message-
> > We don't want to "only allow" the English locale, because we (here
at
> > my work) do not want our international clients (non Russian) to be
> > denied email service.
>
> ok_locales en ja ko th zh
>
> This will allow anything but Cyrillic char sets. Please note tha
> -Original Message-
> From: ItsMikeE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 18 February 2008 11:33 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: "Nice girl like to chat" spam
>
>
> For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
> "Hello! I am tired this evening. I am
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2008 4:43 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: user_prefs: mind the linebreak
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > MK> Why would there ever be a problem
> I've actually been running this set of 5 rules on several of the ISP
> mail systems I've got my fingers in (watch for line wrap, sorry):
>
> # "Nice girl" wants to send pics, but only if you email the address in
> the body
> # start scoring at .5, see how that whacks'em.
> body NICE_GIRL_01
> -Original Message-
> From: Bazooka Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 11:22 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Suggestions to block this spam
>
> I too am getting dozens of these emails that are going right through
> SA + pyzor + dcc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tarak Ranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 1:24 a.m.
> To: Spamassassin
> Subject: How to Know
>
> Hi List,
> how do i come to know that each and every incoming & outgoing mail is
> massing through SA.
>
> /
> Tarak
>
Hmm. Is
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 3:33 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Suggestions to block this spam
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 14:26 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote
> -Original Message-
> Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > > body NICE_GIRL_01 /Hello! I am (?:bored|tired) (?:today|this
> > > (?:afternoon|evening)|tonight)\./
> >
> > Forgive my ignorance, but what does the question mark and colon do
at
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: jeco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 22 February 2008 1:55 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Installation on SpamAssassin
>
>
> Hi to all members here, I'm a new member and would like to ask help on
how
> to
> install SpamAssassin?
), and there will be antivirus scanning
(clamav).
The last line is global configuration, so for every other site,
antivirus checking, and spamassasssin checking are switched on, plus we
block the listed attachments outright.
Sorry if you don't run Simscan, just thought I'd post my $0.2
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
nally, I'd rather blacklist the whole yahoo domain, and tell our clients
that Yahoo is not an acceptable email address, that they will need a real one.
A real one - that delivers and receives mail, like a mail server should.
Cheers
Michael Hutchinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I have tried different approaches, and let us not forget I have
filled
> out 3 whitelist forms, and received no response from Yahoo. Their
service
> is breaking RFC's by not delivering mail. They are ignorant towards
other
> companies trying to use their service.
> But they do deliver the mail.
he other lines, but that will make it
difficult to change your rules if your spam changes.
PS beware the forward and backslash characters, they will need to be
escaped with a single \ each.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
x27;t spam before.
I used to run phrase matching with lots of OR statements to try catch
spam like this, but have since given up rewriting those rules every day
in favour of this one.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 March 2008 11:44 a.m.
> To: spamassassin-users
> Subject: Blogspot (was Re: giberish)
>
> Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > I don't know how the rest of you feel about blogspot
Hi all,
A few months ago we had to restart our Bayes database, as it went
corrupt, according to SA at the time. This was during an SA upgrade, and
I believe it was a faulty install that caused this.
Our old database was running for years and is rather large ( I still
have copies ). The new one i
Hi all,
Another query.. another busy SA day.
I have a piece of Spam that is getting through to one of our biggest
clients. I have written rules to tag this Spam, but it is as if it isn't
even being checked by Spamassassin.
I have checked our qmail control files to ensure we are spamchecking the
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 11:01 a.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Spamassassin not checking a particular Email.
>
> Michael Hutc
> -Original Message-
> From: D Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 12:23 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Spamassassin not checking a particular Email.
>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 at 18:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabu
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 1:09 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Spamassassin not checking a particular Email.
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 at 18:00 -0400, [EMAIL PR
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 14 March 2008 12:09 p.m.
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: Plugin eval failed
>
> Hi all,
>
> I upgraded to sa 3.2.4
>
> And I've been restarting spamd every 15 minutes just to keep mail
coming
> in,
>
From: Agnello George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 7:07 p.m.
To: Spamassassin
Subject: directly going to spam folder in yahoo
>HI
>i am facing a problem from sending mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >to my yahoo
>account , i receive t
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 17 March 2008 2:10 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: How to catch gibberish spam before URIBL lists it?
>
> These eventually show up in the URIBL but with the start of the wave
> they are no
cop,
which doesn't seem to be enough to keep the Spam down to a reasonable
level.
Thanks in advance,
Michael Hutchinson.
> -Original Message-
> From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 1:48 a.m.
> To: Arvid Ephraim Picciani
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: blogspot spam
>
> On 3/19/2008 1:24 PM, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Pepe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 5:18 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Cyrillic spam
>
> For some strange reason, I'm seeing Cyrillic spams very frequently
lately.
>
> None of my users read any Eastern Euro
> -Original Message-
> From: Arvid Ephraim Picciani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 9:04 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: blogspot spam
>
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 20:48:00 Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > For th
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NFN Smith
> Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008 1:54 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Cyrillic spam
>
> Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
>
y
> > > lately.
> > >
> > > None of my users read any Eastern European languages- is there a
quick
> > > way to catch these?
>
> On 20.03.08 08:54, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > You could use the ok_languages and ok_locales settings. I'm sure
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2008 3:18 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: SA-update error
>
> Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months.
Ran
> SA-update -D using the default channel
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 31 March 2008 12:38 p.m.
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: Re: Failed to check the emails
>
> Piotr Zalewa wrote:
> > But some are coming not being checked ...
> > I can find this in the header of the message:
>
required=4
> dbg: check:
>
tests=MISSING_DATE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS
> dbg: check:
>
subtests=__HAS_MSGID,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__M
SO
> E_MID_WRONG_CASE,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__UNUSABLE_MSGID
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rod G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2008 1:26 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: spamassassin lint warnings
>
> Hello. I'm running SA 3.2.4. When I run "spamassassin --lint -D" I get
> a bunch of warnings like those below
> -Original Message-
> From: Rodney Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2008 12:35 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: spamassassin lint warnings
>
> Thanks Mike. However, I'm getting the same warnings for a majority of
> the .cf files in /var/lib/
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Cocca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 April 2008 6:40 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Listing all rules and all scores
>
> Spamassassin Users,
>
> Is there an easy way to get spamassassin to list out all of the rules
> and all o
ect. Over at the CBL FAQ,
they have a trailing full-stop after the address name and I don't know
if this is right or not. And, is local.cf the correct place to setup
URIBL's?
Thanks for any information in advance,
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 April 2008 11:20 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DNS Blocklists with Spamassassin (scoring only)
>
> Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > uridnsbl URIBL_DSBL li
-Original Message-
From: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz [mailto:luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 9:19 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hopfield nerons for porn image detection
Good one,
Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can identify
we check the tags (not necessarily publish them) but I guess
that's an MTA question:)
Thanks in advance for any useful information :)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2009 10:17 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: JoeJobbed - Vbounce plugin - SPF?.
On 17.03.09 14:02, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>> I'm running Spamassassin
assin locally with network tests enabled.
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated ;)
Thanks and Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Limited
Hello Matt, thanks for the response.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:26 a.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
>
> Michael Hut
Hello Dave,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Koontz [mailto:dkoo...@mbc.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:34 a.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
>
> Michael Hutchinson wrote ... (4/7/2009 7:09 P
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:31 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:09 +1200, Michael Hutchinson wrot
> > MailServer:~/spamassassin# spamassassin -D dns -t > [27256] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> > [27256] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.61
>
> You might want to fire up CPAN and upgrade Net::DNS.
[choke]. The last time I used CPAN for upgrading anything on this box,
it broke Spa
l enable --debug
area=dns at your suggestion to see if we can pin this issue for good.
> > If I am correct, this server hasn't used any swap for quite some
> time,
> > but does keep the physical memory well consumed for performance
> reasons.
> > (Debian 3.1 Sarge).
>
> That looks good.
>
> These are superficial suggestions, of course.
They all help, John. Thanks for your response and ideas! :)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
there is nothing wrong with using both. If you do see FP's it would
be a surprise, and the first I've heard of it, personally.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
> -Original Message-
> > If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
> > very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
> > incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
> > positive from Pyzor or DCC yet, and have been using both
be familiar enough with E-Mail to be able to
handle Mailing Lists without too much fuss. If this is such a big
problem perhaps they shouldn't be Administering a Mail Filtering system
at all.
Just my 2cents.
Michael Hutchinson.
nd the amount of Spam that is delivered has
dropped so significantly since then is... quite remarkable. (at a loss
for other words).
So perhaps instead of adding another RBL, maybe some admins need to
consider adding in some HELO checking / rejection.
Thanks and Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris [mailto:cpoll...@embarqmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 17 August 2009 10:45 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: received-header: unparseable:
>
> I keep seeing this when running some messages throught spamassassin -D
> -t. Is this having an effe
We have an additional option: "Require resolvable hostnames"
for HELO arguments, but do not use that.
We have made 6 exceptions for hosts that do not pass the HELO argument
properly, that are out of our control, but known to our network (ie:
trusted via VPN, etc). They haven't relayed any Spam either ;)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
+1 to that.
I'm sick of seeing people being flamed in here. Makes you not want to post, TBH.
Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message-
From: Evan Platt [mailto:e...@espphotography.com]
Sent: Friday, 21 August 2009 3:18 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: your mail
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
> Sent: Friday, 28 August 2009 1:34 p.m.
> To: Irish Online Help Desk
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Your message to the Irish Online Help Desk Re:
> ObfuscationQuestion
>
> See, this is on
> -Original Message-
> From: mouss [mailto:mo...@ml.netoyen.net]
> Sent: Monday, 7 September 2009 9:59 a.m.
> To: Justin Mason
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: antispam comparison by virus bulletin
>
> Justin Mason a écrit :
> > In fairness, they got in touch to ask for h
> -Original Message-
> From: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:ux...@splatnix.net]
> Sent: Monday, 14 September 2009 11:27 p.m.
> To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Non scoring 'Bank Deposit' spam
>
> - "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
>
> | > > > > On 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Gregory [mailto:cgreg...@hwcn.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 September 2009 9:34 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Drivel
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote:
> (more drivel)
>
> Good users all. Never heard of a troll?
> Nonsensic
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Cardwell [mailto:spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 11:54 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Geocities closed
>
> Alex wrote:
>
> > Thought I would pass along that geocities closed up and went home
> -Original Message-
> From: rich...@buzzhost.co.uk [mailto:rich...@buzzhost.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 3:00 a.m.
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Geocities closed
>
> I just found this one working:
>
> http://uk.geocities.com/midsomerland/midsomerland_ind
> I do note that the company concerned continues spamming on a daily
> basis
> and remains white listed:
>
> 80.75.69.201
> sa-accredit.habeas.com
> list.dnswl.org
>
> So please, spare me the sob story about what a wonderful idea HABEAS
> is.
> Talk is cheap, action speaks louder than words.
+1
> But I will miss (a) the entertainment value of some of his posts (his
> "dark forces" one from earlier today was a classic) --AND-- last but
> not
> least--I will miss his willingness to break through the political
> correctness and bring up various points that few others were willing
> (or
>
Hello,
> The taunting *is* the issue. The rest of the arguments, about design
> and
> defaults, are carried on by numerous individuals in a quite civilized
> manner. But when someone starts throwing arond stupid accusations, then
> the person attacked focuses their efforts on 'defending' themselve
>
> The trouble with this is how often are these rules being re-examined
> and re-evaluated?
>
> Not that often. HABEAS has been through three iterations since those
> rules were set at −4 and −8.
>
> What is enabled by default should be the safest possible settings.
> Relying on a third party t
> -Original Message-
> From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2009 4:59 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list
>
> On 16-Dec-2009, at 16:11, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > So far
;m thinking
I probably shouldn't need to. Is there any way around this?
I know there is a SARE ruleset against Pharmacy Spam, but I am very
hesitant to employ it because we have several clients that are pharmacy
outlets, and I worry those rules will burn them.
Thanks in advance, for a
> -Original Message-
> From: hiram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 April 2008 4:32 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrading
>
>
> Hi again!
>
> Sorry, that's what my wife means when she says: "you hear but you
don't
> listen" :-((. Thanks for the answers.
>
ing then.
> Thanks for the advice and the information!
>
> Best regards,
>
> /Hiram
>
>
> Michael Hutchinson-3 wrote:
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >
> > Sir,
> >
> > You or someone else, has managed to break apt-get'
everything" type of thing?
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
Phone: 0800 328 324 | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.manux.co.nz/
> -Original Message-
> From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 April 2008 9:57 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SPF and Hotmail
>
>
> On Tue, April 15, 2008 00:35, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>
> > Can we do SPF che
> -Original Message-
> From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 April 2008 7:25 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SPF and Hotmail
>
>
> On Wed, April 16, 2008 00:14, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>
> >> domain:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2008 8:48 a.m.
> To: James Wilkinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Canadian Spam - tired of writing rules!
>
>
> James Wilkinson writes:
&
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2008 9:08 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Spamassassin Users
> Subject: Re: Dnsbl checks
>
>
> =?utf-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBUYXlsb3I=?= writes:
> > I'm having some issues getting the dns blacklists to wor
> In regards to Pyzor. I'm wondering if anyone out there is using this
> at any large scale. Unlike the razor-agent which appears to be a Perl
> module that gets loaded at startup, I'm concerned about SA having to
> exec the python interpreter and having that setup/teardown time for
> each and e
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 3 May 2008 10:14 a.m.
> To: users
> Subject: Pyzor & DCC
>
> When already running Spamassassin with Razor how much would adding
> Pyzor and DCC to the mix help?
>
> Matt
Pyzor certainly helped our site, but not as much a
-Original Message-
From: doktour1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2008 08:02 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: HELP!! spamasssin killing my server
If I disable spamassassin in my procmail file. The server load goes down
to
85 or less processes in a matte
tuff before that, using a
wildcard for example?
Thanks in advance for any light shed upon the matter,
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 August 2008 1:35 p.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: e greeting exe link
>
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>
> > I
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 August 2008 1:49 p.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: e greeting exe link
>
> Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> >
> > But only match i
essions from "man perlre". Takes a little while
for regular expressions to sink in, but you've got to start somewhere.
It may also help to understand Perl itself a little better... I bought a
book to do that :)
HTH, Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Limited.
> -Original Message-
> From: James Wilkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 3 September 2008 7:23 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CPAN Install Fails
>
> Bob Cohen wrote:
> > I'm running Fedora v9. All of the prerequisite and optional modules
> > installed with n
Hello,
I really don't see how Spamassassin is not "up to par", considering many high
end Net App's use Spamassassin and promote corporate level products that
include it. Maybe it needs to be configured correctly?
In fact, I don't think I've seen any real rival to Spamassassin - except,
maybe,
ervers try to deliver a
message who's recipients don't exist here?
Thanks for any help in advance,
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
| Phone: 0800 328 324
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Web: http://www.manux.co.nz/
happens on
> mailing lists. You'll get copies of messages posted to the list, even
> though when you look at the headers they're "To:
> users@spamassassin.apache.org"... the apache listserv turns around and
> Bcc's all the messages it gets to all of its recipients.
Well, that does make good sense.
Thank-you Matt for the quick and informative reply :)
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
Hello All,
There were so many messages regarding this new Block List, I have to
admit I have not read them all. I get the general idea that this new
Barracuda Reputation Block List isn't all that hot.
For instance, how do Barracuda generate their Block List? I don't think
this has been answered
> -Original Message-
> From: Ned Slider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 1 October 2008 12:15 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: False Positive on SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION rule
>
> Ned Slider wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I'm getting some FP hits against the SUBJECT_FUZZY_TIO
in case it has
problems talking to it's server - the results are undesirable.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
> -Original Message-
> From: William Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 October 2008 4:26 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>
y is that you want to access root's Spamassassin
files as the "postfix" user. You can change the permissions on the
files, but I don't recommend that - there must be another way to achieve
the desired result. (Perhaps user grouping could have something to do
with it) - but this is now turning into a postfix question.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
