It seems to me that Jeff is talking about a way of implementing what
Chris is talking about.
If not, then it still seems like a great compromise! I love the idea!
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:44 AM
To: SURBL Discus
I went ahead and clicked the link and it is apparently a redirect to a
redirect to a redirect before it finally lands at
http://www.wherechristiansmeet.com/index.php?affil=1529-CS0930F .
I'm not sure what to do from there.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Zornetzer [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Matt,
We've used SA for over two years now with settings similar to others
that have replied. You should be fine with a stock SA 3.0.1 install.
We greylist (you'll need other programs to do that) between 3 and 10,
tag as spam at 5 and delete at 10. I've never had one complaint about a
lost email
email. However, we still want the spam
stopping benefits of greylisting.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Hildebrandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 4:58 PM
To: Kristopher Austin
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question on using SpamAssassin at
You've gotten some good responses, but like Chris I will share my
experiences:
We use Exim4 with sa-exim. Sa-exim also adds some greylisting
abilities.
More importantly, Exim4 has LDAP query abilities so we can query our
Active Directory before accepting a recipient. This is essential in our
In all versions of outlook that I can remember using all you have to do
is drag-and-drop the message from outlook into a new message. This
creates an exact copy including headers as an attachment.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Rob MacGregor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Decemb
Dermot,
The easiest way to get the information you are looking for is to run
spamassassin -D --lint. This should give you a debug output, you can
then look through and find out if something isn't running as expected.
You can also start spamd with -D and it will constantly print out debug
output
Nate,
I'm sure there are some good SARE rules for this. Go to
http://www.rulesemporium.com for some good custom made rules. I know
there is antidrug.cf which contains many Pharm phrases.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:35
I could be wrong, but I believe spamd is only used for spamc. If you
are using spamassassin, it loads the files everytime. At least, that's
what I've understood the difference to be between spamd/spamc and
spamassassin.
If I'm wrong, I do apologize. I'm sure you'll get a more official
response
The email you attacked a couple posts ago shows that you are. There was
this line in it:
X-Spam-Level: **
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Antonio DeLaCruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:39 PM
To: martin smith
Cc:
We have found Bayes to be more trouble than it's worth. We were
frequently running into problems keeping the database stable and fresh.
We have a site-wide install so that just made it all the more
problematic.
It definitely depends on your situation. I don't think anyone can make
a blanket stat
Ronan,
whitelist_from hits on the from header. This list sets the from header
to the person sending the email (as it should). Therefore your
whitelist_from entries won't work as you have them. I use
whitelist_from_rcvd instead.
This is my entry for this list:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECT
Tony,
Your main question has already been answered, but I noticed something in
your proposed setup that concerns me.
You state in your diagram that you plan to have the MSE box as the
secondary MX record. This would not be a good idea. From experience,
we have seen that spammers try the seconda
Thomas,
You can do one of two things:
whitelist_to users@spamassassin.apache.org
or
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org
I prefer the latter. Notice the correct format as opposed to what you
used. Make sure to restart SA after performing a --lint.
Kris
-Original Message-
I'm definitely interested in such a script.
Thanks,
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Peuhkurinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 6:37 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dump stats into mysql?
MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am running a couple
Here are a couple of files that we use to get the stats we need. The
glmrtg.pl script counts the number of lines containing the requested
text in the last five minutes (configurable). I didn't write this
script. I'm not even sure where it came from. I think it might have
come with the mrtg dist
Spamassassin -D -t test2.out would work. In *nix
environments you just choose the level by putting the number in front of
the redirect.
This should help you get up to speed on Linux I/O redirection:
http://www.cpqlinux.com/redirect.html
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Mike Schrauder [mail
John,
If you view the Public Folder using Outlook just add the column "Changed
By" using Field Chooser. That should be the person that copied it
there.
I hope that helps.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Stewart, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:33 PM
To: '
I need some help. What do you guys know about untdmarketing.com. About
a month ago I started receiving several dozen messages from them a week.
SA 3.0 with SURBL, URIBL, and SARE rules does not catch them. The
emails seem like requested advertising. There are even unsubscribe
links at the botto
Does anyone have a script of some sort to find rules in
/etc/spamassassin/*.cf that don't hit any email? Or is this a lot more
complicated process than I realize?
I have the SA log files since the beginning of time so all I need is a
sophisticated script that will scan in all the rule names from
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 7:54 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Scoring for MAPS
>
> I would be interesting to know the nature of these 14 nonspam hits. As I
> said, if
> they were not spa
grep "score UPPERCASE_75_100" /usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf
score UPPERCASE_75_100 1.394 1.040 0.809 1.371
-Original Message-
From: Fran Fabrizio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 2:52 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Default score for UPPERCASE_
Well, to make matters interesting, Outlook makes www.rektoky a
hyperlink. Click on it and IE and Firefox will both add the .com.
Voila! You have a spam address that makes it through every time.
Kris
Sent to Nix only previously, meant to send this to the list.
-Original Message-
From: N
Steven, anyone can update the wiki, you just have to have an account.
Just create an account and click edit. At least that seems to have
worked for me.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Steven Manross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 10:10 AM
To: spamassassin-users
S
will type .com anyway.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 1:32 PM
To: Kristopher Austin
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ohya
Kristopher Austin a écrit :
> Well, to make matters interesting, Outlook makes www.r
Thanks, Frank! This looks very useful.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bures [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:05 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Merging Bayes database on a single system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Due to
After seeing all the SPF discussion lately I decided to actually ask you
guys about this problem.
I have many whitelist_from_spf entries where I usually keep my whitelist
entries. For some reason, I have never seen a hit on
USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST. I have received plenty of emails that I believe
s
e have anything other than SPF_HELO_*.
SA is running on my gateway MX.
Anything else I should look at?
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:30 PM
To: Kristopher Austin
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: U
Thanks Matt and Daryl. All your suggestions got my SPF checking
working.
It seems SA-Exim puts in X-SA-Exim-Mail-From as the Envelope From
header.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:19 AM
To: Kristopher Austin
Cc
This is after greylisting and sbl-xbl checks:
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM
1HTML_MESSAGE
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:48 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Post your top 10 from sa-stats
Kristopher Austin wrote:
> RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Post your top 10 from sa-stats
>
> The %OFMAIL category is misleading because its comparing the hit count
> (on that line) ag
I would recommend caution when using such a program. I see lots of spam
that have legitimate URLs sprayed in them as well.
I do think this would be very useful though. Just need to make sure you
look through the rules and remove the good guys.
Kris
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael
I typically use spamassassin -D < testmessage.
Kris
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SA frequently skipping rules
>
> Thanks to Stuart and Daryl for your responses
Oops, I sent that too quick.
It should be spamassassin -r < testmessage.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SA frequently skipping rules
>
> Thanks to Stuart and Dar
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:51 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: General assistance
>
> Am I completely off base in the way I have this all setup? I have
went
> with
> a higher speed HD to increase
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:32 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: General assistance
>
> My homework is:
>
> 1.Install and configure dnscache.
> 2.Look into RBL at the MTA.
> 3.Begin
Are the messages coming from the same sending server? If so, I'd
blacklist it at your MTA until the storm is over.
Kris
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:16 PM
> To: SpamAssassin list
> Subject: User getting spammed
We're a university. I'm not sure if we are as big as you're looking for
(around 2100 mailboxes), but I'd be willing to talk to a reporter.
Kris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:00 PM
> To: users@SpamAssassin.
I have received several copies of a spam message that is in Russian (I think
it's Russian). I get maybe 1 or 2 a week. I wish I could block all Russian
messages, but we are a University and could easily have Russian students. I am
unable to read this message and therefore have no ideas on how
40 matches
Mail list logo
